1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Edinburgh
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
The Square Metre for Butterflies project was initiated by the Royal Botanic Gardens of Edinburgh (RBGE), in partnership with the Butterfly Conservation Trust, as an Edinburgh Living Landscape network membership activity. By planting relatively small-sized patches of caterpillar food plants on the roofs of mainly office buildings, the aim of the project is to enhance green roofs in order to increase their value for biodiversity, and for native butterflies in particular. Office buildings in Edinburgh’s city centre are targeted because of their location close to Arthur’s Seat hill, which is the natural habitat of Edinburgh’s butterflies. [ref 1]
Address

Edinburgh
United Kingdom

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Empty rooftops
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2016
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2016
End date of the intervention
ongoing
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
By planting relatively small-sized patches of caterpillar food plants on the roofs of mainly office buildings, the aim of the project is to enhance green roofs in order to increase their value for biodiversity, and for native butterflies in particular. In addition, it is a way of showing people how the urban landscape can be enhanced to benefit biodiversity even on a small scale. The initiators hope to demonstrate through this project that it is important to think not just about the quantity, but also the quality of urban green spaces. [ref 1, 2]
Quantitative targets
unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
The RGBE followed up with a training for building users interested in how to recognize and record the butterflies that visit their roofs. This has as a co-benefit that awareness is created of the existence and potential of green roofs, a building feature not usually seen from the street, while records can also be used for monitoring purposes. [re 1]
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
Three types of butterflies have been chosen as specific target species: Northern Brown Argus butterfly, small copper butterfly, and common blue butterfly. In talks with the Butterfly Conservation Trust, the idea was hatched to conceptualize the project as literal ‘square metres’ of vegetation. Several sites were visited of known public and private buildings with green roofs in the vicinity of Arthur’s Seat to see if and how these roofs could be enhanced. The general goal of the initiative is to persuade and encourage people to commit to a square metre for butterflies, for which the RBGE then provides the plants. After agreeing with the proposal for a square metre, building users are involved in the creation of the square metres wherever possible, although larger organizations generally have landscape contractors who manage their green roofs. At present, 10 roofs have been fitted with square metres providing food plants for the selected butterflies’ caterpillars. [ref 1, 2]
NBS domain and interventions
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Pollination
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Other
Please specify "other cultural service"
Awareness-raising [ref 1]
Scale
Spatial scale
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Other
Please specify other non-government actors involved
The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) is a non-departmental public body. Butterfly Conservation Trust is a charity.
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE), a non-departmental government body and the Butterfly Conservation Trust, a charitable foundation, co-lead the project. The Square Metre for Butterflies project can be traced back to RBGE providing funding for an officer to help deliver some of the actions in the Edinburgh Living Landscape (ELL) network’s programme. RBGEs ELL officer came with the idea to focus on enhancing green roofs for the benefit of butterflies and other pollinators, and approached the Butterfly Conservation Trust to develop a project. The Scottish Wildlife Trust is involved as well, albeit more in the background, championing the project by keeping a close watch over its continuation or sharing it within political arenas. [ref 1]
Key actors - initiating organization
Please specify other key actors – Initiating organization
non-departmental government body
Please specify other Key actors - Other stakeholders involved
Non-departmental government body
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Non-government organisation/civil society
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Other
Please specify other land owner
The project is being targeted at various rooftops from public and private lands including the Scottish Parliament, Royal Botanic Garden, Scottish Government at Victoria Quay, a number of private offices, churches, a respite care centre and other public parks and green spaces. [ref 3]
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Please specify other landowner
The project is being targeted at various rooftops from public and private lands including the Scottish Parliament, Royal Botanic Garden, Scottish Government at Victoria Quay, a number of private offices, churches, a respite care centre and other public parks and green spaces. [ref 3]
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Please specify other type of voluntary intervention
The Square Metre for Butterflies project can be traced back to RBGE providing funding for an officer to help deliver some of the actions in the Edinburgh Living Landscape (ELL) network’s programme. RBGEs ELL officer came with the idea to focus on enhancing green roofs for the benefit of butterflies and other pollinators, and approached the Butterfly Conservation Trust to develop a project. [ref 1]
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The Square Metre for Butterflies project links in with two existing policies on biodiversity: the Scottish Pollinator Strategy and the National Biodiversity Strategy. Although the project was not developed because of these strategies, they do provide extra weight to the project, and as such support the project’s advocates in lobbying work for future funding. [ref 1]
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The RBGE is the main funder of the project, although most of the funding is used to cover staff expenses. Delivery partners are expected to pay for maintenance, and in some cases offer to contribute to implementation as well. For instance, the boxes for the square metre at the Glenmorangie premises were purchased by the company at a prisoners’ woodwork shop. Plants are provided by the RBGE. Training of staff at the organisations involved, on butterflies and their ecology, is provided by the Butterfly Conservation Trust. The project launch was funded and hosted by Glenmorangie. [ref 1]
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown. The RBGE is the main funder of the project, although most of the funding is used to cover staff expenses. Delivery partners are expected to pay for maintenance, and in some cases offer to contribute to implementation as well. [ref 1]
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Please specify technological innovation
The project can be perceived of as an incremental innovation, adding on to and enhancing green roof technologies. The project operates on a small budget without dedicated project funding, and can therefore be thought of as an experiment; the aspects that work will be developed further, while it is easier to discard aspects that do not work given the low cost. An innovative aspect of the project is its focus on enhancing pre-existing green roofs, in the hope of raising the bar of what is considered a sustainable building as not all green roofs are equally beneficial for biodiversity. One ambition of this project is to engage the development community in thinking about what they can do to improve the quality of the urban and natural environment with green roofs, to what extent buildings can connect better to their local environmental context. [1]
Please specify social innovation
The general goal of the initiative is to persuade and encourage people to commit to a square metre for butterflies, for which the RBGE then provides the plants. After agreeing with the proposal for a square metre, building users are involved in the creation of the square metres wherever possible. Establishments who buy-in to the project are trained by the RBGE on how to recognize and record the butterflies that visit their roof which simultaneously raises awareness on the species of butterflies of Edinburgh, establishes a monitoring scheme, and involves building users in the enhancement of urban biodiversity in a meaningful way. This can be deemed as a governance innovation as it help capture people's imagination and demonstrates that even small interventions, for which only modest adjustments are needed, could be of significance for enhancing urban biodiversity.
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The idea has not been replicated or drawn inspiration from examples elsewhere. Given its unique character, it has been promoted by biodiversity officers at various local authorities, who are active in the Scottish Local Biodiversity Officers Partnership, along with other greening projects. To replicate the project elsewhere, it would ideally also be focused on an iconic native (butterfly) species. This could be a challenge as the Northern Brown Argus lives at heights and roofs are therefore a good place to plant vegetation for them. Elsewhere this could be different for iconic local species. Working together with local ecologists is therefore important in scaling up the project. [1]
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The idea has not been replicated or drawn inspiration from examples elsewhere. The project is transferable, if local butterfly species and their habitat preferences (e.g. building height) are taken into account. For this project, the particular butterfly species and its habitat around Edinburgh’s Arthur’s Seat hill were essential ingredients. In addition, a ‘champion’ of the project with a good local network and specialised (ecological) knowledge seems crucial, in this case the RBGE in collaboration with the Butterfly Conservation have taken up that role. The project has not been copied from or been replicated elsewhere so far. [2]
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project has caused an increase in the total green spaces in the city as well as increase the biodiversity. An innovative aspect of the project is its focus on enhancing pre-existing green roofs, in the hope of raising the bar of what is considered a sustainable building. The choice was to focus on the three local and prolific butterfly species. The roofs were chosen to be in close vicinity of Arthur's seat, to create an ecological connection between them and with Arthur's seat, which is a natural habitat for the butterflies. [ref 1, 3]
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
The project demonstrated the importance of green roofs as high-level resources for pollinators and other wildlife. Planting out has involved being roped up on the Scottish Parliament roof, working with staff, volunteers and landscape contractors at offices and planting out with primary school pupils at a major construction site in central Edinburgh. Also, there are follow up sessions on butterfly identification with staff so that they can monitor these areas at lunchtime and send in their records. The Butterfly Conservation Trust provides staff training to organisations as a follow-up to the rooftop intervention. In addition, they use the project to collect data on butterflies through ‘citizen science’, asking employees of the organisations to report back on the number and types of butterflies spotted using a fill-out poster on site. [ref 1]
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
As the project is still at an early stage, it is unclear if and what social, environmental and economic impacts the project will have, although impacts on biodiversity of selected butterfly species are predicted. Monitoring of impacts on butterfly presence and biodiversity is planned. Respondents indicate that to increase impact, the organisational capacity – resources and staff time –would need to be enlarged, and, directly related to that, the budget. That way the project can best build upon the momentum created by the first few square metre implementations. [ref 1]
Environmental, social and economic impacts
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of August, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
The Butterfly Conservation Trust provides staff training to organisations as a follow-up to the rooftop intervention. In addition, they use the project to collect data on butterflies through ‘citizen science’, asking employees of the organisations to report back on the number and types of butterflies spotted using a fill-out poster on site. However, limited data has been collected thus far. [1]
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
[1] van der Jagt, S. and Dorst, H. (2018). NATURVATION working paper WP4. Nature-based Solutions in Edinburgh: A Case Study. Section 5 – Square Metre for Butterflies. pp. 39-50
[2] Dorst, H. and van der Jagt, S. (2018). Development of a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform and Think tank to promote innovation with Nature based solutions. WP 3: Case Study Template. WP 3: Case Study Template.
[3] Edinburgh Living Landscape (no date) SQUARE METRE FOR BUTTERFLIES. Available at: https://edinburghlivinglandscape.org.uk/project/square-metre-butterflies/. Accessed on 30th August, 2020.
[4] The Scottish Parliament (no date) Scottish Parliament Biodiversity Statement 2018–2021. Available at: https://www.parliament.scot/FMResources/Biodiversity_Statement_2018-2021.pdf. Accessed on 30th August, 2020.
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Edinburgh Living Landscape
Edinburgh Living Landscape
https://edinburghlivinglandscape.org.uk/project/square-metre-butterflies/
Image
Edinburgh Living Landscape
Edinburgh Living Landscape
https://edinburghlivinglandscape.org.uk/project/square-metre-butterflies/