1. General information
2. Objectives of the intervention
3. NBS domains, ES and scale
4. Governance and financing
5. Evaluation and learning
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Actors involved in the assessment, monitoring or evaluation of NBS impacts
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Type of indicators
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Link to monitoring/evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unkown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Yes
Transparency
Community satisfaction
Description of locals satisfaction with the project
There is little feedback but the one that is found is positive. The project organizers are congratulated for the creation of the green zone.
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Please specify Trade-offs & Negative impacts Selected
Depending on project implementation, residents may face gentrification or changes in neighbourhood dynamics (5)
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
Yes
Goal setting and impacts delivery
No, although benefits were delivered in all the 3 key areas, but in the planning phase, the project did not aim to address issues in all the 3 key priority areas.
Reaching original project goals
Long-term perspective
Yes
Cost-effective solutions
Yes
Equitable impacts
Transformative capacity
Magnitude of change
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Yes
NBS Supports ecological or environmental anxiety
Yes
References: NBS Supports ecological or environmental anxiety
To create ‘quiet’ areas inside the city, with lower noise exposure and better air quality, supporting investment into environmental health and ‘anti-stress’ lifestyles (2)
The city faces challenges related to biodiversity loss, urban loneliness, and climate anxiety.
The city faces challenges related to biodiversity loss, urban loneliness, and climate anxiety.
6. Sources
1.
Lisbon Conexus Life-Lab (2023). Fast Forests for Lisbon: Nature, Community, Connections. Accessed on October 16, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Network Nature (n.d.). CONEXUS (6.1) – LISGREEN: re-naturing urban spaces in Lisbon. Accessed on October 16, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
URBEM (n.d.). Parque do Vale da Montanha Fast Forest: Plot 2. Accessed on October 16, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Global Tree Initiative (2022). A whisper from the woods. Accessed on October 16, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
5.
CONEXUS (2024). LISGREEN – Renatura Fast Forests for Lisbon. Accessed on October 16, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Public Images
Image
Fast forest in Parque do Vale da Montanha
Network Nature
Image
Fast Forest in Parque do Vale da Montanha
URBEM

