1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Munich
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Riemer Park
Short description of the intervention
In 1995 the city of Munich decided to implement a new green residential district in the derelict area of the former Munich-Riem airport which was closed in 1992. (Reference 9) The area was designed to have an intensively used residential area in the north and an extensively used green recreational area in the south. The project was completed in 2005. It is 210 hectares large, making it the third-largest public park in Munich. (Reference 1) The park includes a 10-hectare large artificial lake, a 15-hectare large forest and two 20 meter high artificial observation and toboggan hills made from the demolition material of the former airport. (Reference 9) The park is appreciated by people but concerns about the loss of biodiversity have been raised. Citizens use the park for walking, cycling, swimming in the lake or simply for relaxation. (Reference 4)
Address

Riemer Park
81829 München
Germany

Area boundary
POINT (11.67749 48.13683)
POINT (11.69784 48.14001)
POINT (11.72101 48.13835)
POINT (11.7138 48.13082)
POINT (11.70221 48.12263)
POINT (11.68419 48.12664)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Reference 8: https://books.google.hu/books?id=MD4wDwAAQBAJ&dq=riemer+park+m%C3%BCnchen&hl=hu&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Total area
2100000.00m²
NBS area
2100000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
1995
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
1997
End date of the intervention
2005
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
- Creation of extensive green areas for the development of the new district near the area of the former airport ;
- Following the principle of sustainable urban development set out by the Munich Perspective (Reference 10), "compact, urban, green";
- Creating a model for sustainable urban development;
- Ensuring biotype networks, guaranteeing biodiversity;
- Increasing accessibility to green areas, creating opportunities for recreation. (Reference 1).
Quantitative targets
The description of the project says, "In the spatial planning procedure, the so-called third-party solution was defined. One third living, one third trade fair and trade, one third green" (Reference 1). As a result the project aimed at creating a 210 hectare large semi-natural public park with approximately 190 hectare large public green areas and a 10 hectare large lake, provide dwelling for 16000 residents.
Monitoring indicators defined
- number of residents in the new residential area
- size of the semi-natural public area (Reference 1)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Implementation activities
- A 15-hectare large forest was planted using local species, that is 8.5 hectares of oak, hornbeam and linden forest, 4.4 hectares of oak and pine forest and 2.1 hectares of forest edges with 20 different types of trees and Planting altogether 21.400 trees and 32.800 shrubs and hedgerows (Reference 1, 2)
- Creating paths for pedestrians
- Creating a 10-hectare large lake by pumping ground water to the surface.
- Creation of residential areas where 16,000 people could live
- Two 20-meter-high artificial observation and toboggan hills made from the demolition material of the former airport (Reference 9)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Blue infrastructure
Lakes/ponds
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
21,400
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Carbon storage/sequestration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The financing of a project Messestadt of Riem would not have been possible within the budget of the state capital Munich and thus private companies were involved. The MRG (Munich Reed GmbH) was founded in October 1993 by Bayerische Baubetreuungs GmbH (BABAG) and GBWAG Bayerische Wohnungs-Aktiengesellschaft. The tasks of the MRG include, in particular, the implementation of the technical, social and cultural infrastructure. Besides the construction of roads, it includes the construction of sewage canals and public green spaces, the construction of the Riemer Park, the construction of schools, children's playgrounds and sports facilities (Reference 7).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Please specify other participatory methods
"The planning committee was commissioned by the city council (resolution of the plenary assembly of 27.01.1999) to initiate a participation of the inhabitants of the neighborhood of Riem to support the further development of the 1st construction section of the Messestadt Riem" (Reference 7).
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The plans were supervised by the city's Department of Horticulture and Department of Green Planning (Reference 1).
The documents of the project refer to the city's sustainable urban development strategy, to the Perspective Munich, which has green strategy as well (Reference 1).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The intervention was described in a municipal plan entitled "Riemerpark: A park withour borders" (Reference 1).
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The documents of the project refer to the city's sustainable urban development strategy, to the Perspective Munich, which has green strategy as well (Reference 1).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
In 1995 an international idea and feasibility competition was held. The program had to take into consideration the recreational, ecological and aesthetic aspects (Reference 1).
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
70,500,000
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The full cost of the project was approximately 70,5 million EUR in 2005 (Reference 1).
Type of fund(s) used
Please specify other type of fund used
The tasks of MRG were pre-financed by a bank consortium (Reference 7).
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The park was created in accordance with the vision of Munich for dense, urban and green development, and aimed to serve as a model for sustainable urban development. The plans had to be up-to-date, taking into consideration ecology, landscape and recreation. As the documents of the intervention say, "the city of Munich is proud to be able to create a functional and ecologically high-quality park with the Riemerpark, which is seamlessly integrated into the already existing large green spaces like the Englischer Garten, Nymphenburger Schlosspark, Isaranlagen, Olympiapark, Ostpark and Westpark" (Reference 1).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project created the third largest park in Munich. (Reference 9) The creation of a 15-hectare large forest with a diverse range of species and local trees has contributed to increased carbon sequestration.
“When one cubic meter of wood grows, one ton of carbon dioxide is extracted, of which 250 kilos are determined as carbon in the wood and 750 kilos are released as oxygen.” (Reference 10) It serves as a 400 m wide ventilation corridor that sustains the inner city with fresh air (Reference 1)
There is conflicting information on the way in which the project affected animal habitats. While there are reports of hares, grey partridges, pheasants and foxes being abundant in the forest (Reference 10), there are also accounts (Reference 2) that claim that the project was a setback for the biodiversity of the area.
In 2005, the park received the German Landscape Architecture award, (Landshaftsarchitechtur-preis) which is awarded to exemplary projects of contemporary, socially and ecologically oriented open space and landscape planning achievements. (Reference 9)
Description of economic benefits
According to a report by the municipality of Munich (Reference 7), the project has succeeded in offering housing and commercial space to the market in an urban environment that has attracted investors and has enabled the new district to grow rapidly.
Description of social and cultural benefits
With the swimming opportunity, the pedestrian routes, the bicycle areas and many benches, the project has provided the citizens of the district with an accessible urban greenspace area that is attractive to people of all ages. (Reference 8) An article in the local newspaper reports that the park is greatly appreciated by citizens and is always full of people.
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
- German Landscape Architecture prize of 2005
- Users' feedback: the area wasn't sustained and in the last 10 years it seriously downgraded, but now it is much more appreciated. (Reference 5)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
- due to increased human presence, the wild animals that occupied the area when the airport was abandoned, disappeared: as a local writes "[w]hen we moved to the site of the old airport in 1999, we found a nature paradise! Almost every day I saw hares [...] 15 years later, the picture has changed very much. Thousands of people have moved in and use the park for sports and leisure. Ground-nesting birds such as larks and little ringed plovers had no more chance and the hives had almost disappeared" (Reference 3).
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown (in July 2020)
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
The local newspaper made short interviews with users of the park, asking how they use the Riemer Park. (Reference 4)
People also give feedback on the area on muenchen.de (Reference 5)
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
1. Landeshauptstadt München. (2005) Der Riemer Park: ein park ohne Grenzen. München: Landeshauptstadt München. Available at: https://docplayer.org/16688326-Der-riemer-park-ein-park-ohne-grenzen-landeshauptstadt-muenchen.html [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
2. Messmer, C. (2014). Vom wilden Naturparadies zum ordentlichen Großstadtpark. Take off! Stadtteilzeitung der Messestadt-Riem. (53), pp. 8-9. Available at: https://www.kulturzentrummessestadt.de/files/downloads/TakeOff53.pdf [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
3. Häuser, H. (2014). Der Riemer Park – ein Drittel kleiner als geplant: Der große Unvollendete. Take off! Stadtteilzeitung des Messestadt-Riem. (53), pp. 12-13. Available at: https://www.kulturzentrummessestadt.de/files/downloads/TakeOff53.pdf [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
4. Takeoff! (2014) Wofür nutzen Sie den Riemen Park?Take off! Stadtteilzeitung des Messestadt-Riem. Available at: https://www.kulturzentrummessestadt.de/files/downloads/TakeOff53.pdf (53), p. 14. [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
5. Muenchen.de. (2017) Riemer Park. [online] Available at: http://www.muenchen.de/sehenswuerdigkeiten/orte/119360.html [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020].
6. Muenchen.de. (2017) Riemer Park. [image]. Available at: http://www.muenchen.de/sehenswuerdigkeiten/orte/119360.html [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020].
7. Landeshauptstadt München (2005). Messestadt Riem Vom Flugfeld zum neuen Stadtteil – eine Zwischenbilanz. München: Landeshauptstadt München. Available at:http://docplayer.org/7508518-Messestadt-riem-vom-flugfeld-zum-neuen-stadtteil-eine-zwischenbilanz-landeshauptstadt-muenchen.html [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
8. Lezuo, D. (2016) Wie kommt der Entwurf zur Landschaft? Kalsruhe: Scientific Publishing. Available at: https://books.google.hu/books?id=MD4wDwAAQBAJ&dq=riemer+park+m%C3%BCnchen&hl=hu&source=gbs_navlinks_s [Accessed: 30 Jul. 2020]
9. Wikipedia.org. (2019). Riemer Park. [online] Available at: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemer_Park [Accessed: 30 Jul. 2020]
10. Muenchenwiki.de (2020). Riemer Wald. [online]. Available at: https://www.muenchenwiki.de/wiki/Riemer_Wald#Lage [Accessed: 30 Jul. 2020]
11. Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation. (1998). Munich: Future Perspective. Munich: Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation.
Comments and notes
Additional insights
The Federal Garden Show 2005 (Bundesgartenschau - BUGA 2005) was held there and thus it is often referred as BUGA park (Reference 1).
Public Images
Image
Riemer Park: The Lake
http://www.bls-bayern.de/wp-content/uploads/riem-lage-04-1024x682.jpg
Image
Riemer Park: Pedestrian Path
https://images.cdn.baunetz.de/img/2/4/6/0/9/63de3d500552c3fa.jpg