1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Oslo
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Markaloven
Short description of the intervention
Oslo is completely surrounded by old forests full of wildlife and native species, providing important ecological services. This “Green Belt Boundary”, known as Marka, has been approved to be protected by the City Government in order to “ensure that the forests are protected against urban development. The management of the city’s forests follows a multi-user plan based on ecological principles and places the emphasis on a long-term and target-oriented development of a varied recreational forest that allows for nature conservation and outdoor activities”. 1,700km2 are protected by the Marka Act, of where 310km2 are located within Oslo municipality. (Ref. 1,9)
Address

Norway

Area boundary
POINT (10.508935 59.756468)
POINT (10.276491 59.758058)
POINT (10.254419 60.032109)
POINT (10.581384 60.283209)
POINT (10.965958 60.244689)
POINT (11.030058 60.006581)
POINT (10.908468 60.003083)
POINT (11.200894 59.796372)
POINT (10.952436 59.671216)
POINT (10.707241 59.969477)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marka,_Oslo
Total area
310000000.00m²
NBS area
310000000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Forested area (Ref. 1)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
pre-1990
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2009
End date of the intervention
2009
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The purpose of the Marka Act is to promote and facilitate outdoor activities, nature experiences and sports. The law protects the borders of Marka and preserves a rich and varied landscape as well as a natural and cultural environment with cultural heritage. At the same time, consideration is given to sustainable use for other purposes. (Ref. 2) Finally, the Act aims to ensure comprehensive management of Marka. (Ref. 3)
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
Amount of protected land (Ref. 4).
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Implementation activities
- Protected vast amounts of land, mainly forested areas, from urban development so that important habitat and wildlife is preserved and people are free to enjoy the nature of Marka, exercise sports, and use the area for recreational purposes
- Protected cultural heritage such as traces of early settlements in Marka and use of the region.
(Ref. 5)
Type of NBS project
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Green corridors and green belts
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Local Government:
-Municipalities: Responsible for supervising compliance with the provisions of the Marka Act and process applications under the Act at a first instance, including applications for building and construction measures within Marka.

Regional Government:
-The County Governor (Fylkesmannen) of Oslo and Akershus: Regional disciplinary body for matters under the Marka Act, including for all municipalities and county councils within Marka. This body shall prepare matters regarding special protection within Marka, as well as prepare trails, paths and facilitate traffic. The latter can be made by public authorities and organizations with the purpose of public outdoor pursuit, if allowed by the city governor.

National Government:
-The Nature Supervision Authority (SNO): Controls and supervises the area in accordance with the Act on National Nature Supervision.
-The Environmental Protection Ministry - Supreme Administrative Authority

Citizens/ NGOs:
-The Marka Board: Representatives from NGOs and the society to fulfil the goals of the Marka Act; largely involved in assessment and evaluation of decisions regarding Marka (Ref. 6)
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Please specify other land owner
Public space owned by other municipalities (Ref. 4,6)
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Please specify other landowner
Public space owned by other municipalities (Ref. 4,6)
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
The Marka Act is part of Norwegian law. The Marka Act itself is not being referred to as being implemented in response to another national regulation. (Ref. 5)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The protection of Marka (Oslo part) was already statued in the Municipal master plan of Oslo in 1990 (Ref. 10). The Outdoor Council of Oslo and Surrounds (Oslo og Omland Friluftsråd) had also been pushing for special protection of Marka for decades (Ref. 7)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
Municipal master plan of Oslo in 1990 (Ref. 10).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The OpenNESS Project. (Ref. 8) The Marka Act is related to this research in that helps ensuring quiet areas closer to Oslo citizens. (Ref. 9)
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify social innovation
The Marka Act is part of Norwegian law. Details on how this area is to be governed and protected is specified therein. (Ref. 2)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Protected Green Space/ Habitats:
Protected vast amounts of land, mainly forested areas, from urban development so that important habitat and wildlife is preserved (Ref. 5)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Recreation:
Protected vast amounts of land (1700 km2, Ref. 1), mainly forested areas, from urban development so that people are free to enjoy the nature of Marka, exercise sports and use the area for recreational purposes. (Ref. 5)

Natural/ Cultural Heritage:
The protection of Marka also protected cultural heritage such as traces of early settlements in Marka and use of the region. (Ref. 5)

Local Involvement:
Citizens largely involved in assessment and evaluation of decisions regarding Marka (Ref. 6)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Area of protected land [km2] (Ref. 1,4)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown in relation to this particular NBS, but a recent study found that outdoor recreational activity increased by 291% during lockdown in Oslo (Ref. 11)
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Board of Marka (Markarådet) consists of citizens from different organizations and political parties from the public and acts as an ombudsman for other involved parties in relation to the Marka Act (Ref. 6). The Outdoor Council of Oslo and Surrounds (Oslo og Omland Friluftsråd) has also been largely involved in the Marka Act (Ref. 7).
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
The Board of Marka is a citizen-run initiative that is largely involved in assessment and evaluation of decisions regarding Marka (Ref. 6)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. The City of Oslo (2003). Strategy for Sustainable Development. Environment and Sustainability Status 2002. Urban Ecology Programme 2002–2014. Oslo [Not available in 2020].
2. Lovdata (n.d.). Law of nature areas in Oslo and other municipalities (The Marka Act)/Lov om naturområder i Oslo og nærliggende kommuner (markaloven). Available at: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2009-06-05-35 [Accessed: 30 October 2020].
3. Statens Naturoppsyn (2013). Act on nature areas in Oslo and nearby municipalities./Lov om naturområder i Oslo og nærliggende kommuner. [Not available in 2020].
4. Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus (2017). The Marka Act/Markaloven. Available at: https://www.fylkesmannen.no/Oslo-og-Akershus/Miljo-og-klima/Marka/Markaloven/ [Accessed: 30 October 2020].
5. Bugge, J & Reusch, C. (2010). Handbook for the Marka Act./Håndbok for Markaloven. Oslo og Omland Friluftsråd. Oslo. [Document provided].
6. The State of Norway (2009). Implementation of the Marka Act/Iverksettning av Markaloven. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/t-309-iverksetting-av-markaloven/id577064/ [Accessed: 30 October 2020].
7. Oslo og Omland Friluftsråd (2002). General info about OOF. Available at: http://www.osloogomlandfriluftsrad.no/om-oof/hvem-er-oof [Accessed: 30 October 2020].
8. The City of Oslo (2017). Quiet Urban Areas. [Not available in 2020].
9. The City of Oslo (2017). The Protection of Marka. Available at: https://www.oslo.kommune.no/english/politics-and-administration/green-oslo/best-practices/marka/ [Accessed: 30 October 2020].
10. ByPlan Oslo (1990). Municipal Master Plan. Oslo Municipality's part of Marka. Kommunedelplan. Oslo kommunes del av Oslomarka. March 1990. [Document provided].
11. Venter, Z. et al. (2020). Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/kbdum [Document provided].
Attachments
Attachment Size
Ref. 5 Handbook for the Marka Act (2.28 MB) 2.28 MB
Comments and notes
Comments
Section 4/ Actors: Difficult to distinguish which bodies of government were local/ regional/ national.
Additional insights
section 4 enablers: Green and blue-green infrastructure is central in several policies in, strategies and plans in Oslo, but they are not always specifically GI/BI/NBS plans
Oslo is a very progressive city when it comes to climate change adaptation and sustainability. However, no specific city network focused on climate change was found, but their work on climate change adaption is rather embedded in visions and strategies of most businesses/agencies/networks and projects
Public Images
Image
Marka
Source: Ref. 9
Image
Marka 1
Source: https://naturvernforbundet.no/noa/markaloven-og-markagrensa/category3327.html
Image
Marka 2
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marka,_Oslo