1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Berlin (FUA)
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Ökologische und nachhaltige Sanierung auf dem Reginhard-Schulhof
Short description of the intervention
The schoolyard at Reginhard Primary School in Reinickendorf faced persistent challenges, often becoming unusable due to poor drainage. After rainfall, water would pool, leaving the yard submerged and inaccessible to the 400 primary school pupils. Even in dry weather, the schoolyard was far from ideal: a lack of play equipment made it uninviting, and in summer, the area became excessively hot, offering little comfort or shade. Both children and the school community, including teaching staff and parents, voiced a strong desire for improvement.
Adding to the urgency for redesign, Berliner Wasserbetriebe imposed a discharge restriction, requiring rainwater to be managed on-site. This led to a comprehensive transformation of the school grounds. Large areas were unsealed, allowing water to seep naturally into the ground. Underground seepage systems were installed to enhance drainage, and the redesign introduced green spaces, a school garden, and near-natural play and exercise areas. These changes not only resolved the flooding issue but also created a more inviting and sustainable environment for students.
The focus on ecological and sustainable design improved the microclimate, providing cooler surroundings and enabling outdoor breaks filled with activity and fresh air. The redesign transformed the schoolyard into a vibrant space that meets the needs of both children and the environment.
This project was funded by the Berlin Programme for Sustainable Development (BENE Umwelt) and financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). (Ref. 3; Ref. 4)
Implementation area characterization
Address

Letteallee 39
13409 Berlin
Germany

Area boundary (map-based)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
https://www.google.de/maps/@52.5637442,13.3702978,158m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Total area
2850.00m²
NBS area
2850.00m²
Area description
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Schoolground
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2018
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2018
End date of the intervention
2021
Present stage of the intervention
Objectives of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
To prevent flooding by installing infiltration systems. (Ref. 3)
To improve the microclimate through unsealing the grounds and providing shade. (Ref. 3)
To increase the greening of outdoor areas. (Ref. 3)
To improve the play and recreational value of the space for children. (Ref. 3)
To create areas where children can experience and learn about nature. (Ref. 3)
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Implementation activities and NBS focus
Implementation activities
The school yard experienced an eco-social upgrading and improvement of its rainwater management.
The existing infiltration trench was renewed and enlarged, and trees, shrubs, flowering shrubs and a school garden were implemented, which constitute settings for a green classroom and spaces to encounter nature. Natural-based materials were used to construct and design play and exercise areas on the grounds.
The degree of sealing was reduced. Of the total area of 2,850 square metres, 1,461 square metres were designed with water-permeable surfaces or unsealed. This corresponds to a degree of sealing of around 50% and a reduction in sealed surfaces of around 20% compared to the existing area. This measure has improved the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate in the school playground. (Ref. 3) An important element in the nature-orientated redesign of the schoolyard was the involvement of the student parliament. Thanks to the children's' involvement, a boulder was given a new lease of life. (Ref. 4)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Green playgrounds and school grounds
Design elements for well-being
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Flood regulation
Cultural services
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Demographics in implementation area
The school is located in the district of Reinickendorf. In 2023, approx. 268.800 people lived in Reinickendorf. Out of these, approx. 45.000 people had a diverse ethnic background and German citizenship and approx. 60.000 people were classified as foreigners. The average age is 44,6 years old. (Ref. 5)
Socio-economic profile of the area
Communities vulnerable to environmental hazards or climate change impacts
Unknown
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Primary Beneficiaries
Specify primary beneficiaries
The school children benefit the most from the project, as they have greater recreational opportunities and a cooler environment. (Ref. 4)
Marginalized groups
Governance
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The project was financed by the regional government through the Berlin Programme for Sustainable Development (BENE Umwelt) and EU funding . The project was designed by a landscape architect and the school children participated in the implementation of the project. The school had to implement the project due to a discharge restriction imposed by the Berlin water company. (Ref. 3; Ref. 4)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Private sector/corporate actor/company
EU body
Uncommon actors ("Missing actors")
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to a Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers & Barriers
Please provide details (e.g, name of the plan or strategy) for the selected policies or initiatives.
The redesign was funded by the Berlin Programme for Sustainable Development (BENE Umwelt), which is financed partially by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and regional allocated budget. BENE Umwelt promotes environmental protection in and around disadvantaged urban neighbourhoods and helps to achieve Berlin's climate targets.
Arrangements for governance cooperation
Barriers
The available space was limited: pipes, trees and play equipment with foundations above infiltration bodies would be difficult. For this reason, infiltration bodies were installed under wooden decks, wooden walkways and under a small football pitch area. (Ref. 3)
Financing
Please specify total cost (EUR)
total costs: 598.000,00 €
BENE funding: € 598,000.00
of which ERDF: € 299,000.00
(Ref. 2)

Investment costs for decentralised water management: approx. 88,000€
Operating costs: Cleaning the channels and the filter in the shaft estimated at approx. 3,000 - 4,000€
Main cost drivers in planning and implementation: Supply and disposal systems (trenches) approx. 48,000€
Soil removal: approx. 40,000€
Playground, play areas, platforms, etc.: approx. 250,000€
Traffic areas: 10,000€
Furnishings: approx. 25,000€
Plants: 10,000€
Other (clearing, digital measurement, etc.): 55,000€
Planning costs: 88,000€
Preliminary soil survey: 5,000€
(Ref. 3)
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
598.000,00 € (Ref. 2)
Source(s) of funding
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Entrepreneurship opportunities
No
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Lowered local temperature: "This measure has improved the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate in the school playground. (Ref. 3)"

Improved stormwater management: "The degree of sealing was reduced. Of the total area of 2,850 square metres, 1,461 square metres were designed with water-permeable surfaces or unsealed. This corresponds to a degree of sealing of around 50% and a reduction in sealed surfaces of around 20% compared to the existing area. This measure has improved the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate in the school playground. (Ref. 3)"
--Achieved increased green space area: "The degree of sealing was reduced. Of the total area of ​​2,850 square meters, 1,461 square meters were designed with water-permeable surfaces or were unsealed. This corresponds to a degree of sealing of around 50 percent and a reduction in the sealed areas of around 20 percent compared to the existing area. This measure improved ecological and sustainable aspects in the schoolyard, such as the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate." (Ref. 3)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: "With ecological and sustainable aspects in mind, a place was designed that allows for breaks characterised by exercise in the fresh air." (Ref. 4)

Enhanced cognitive restoration, relaxation and stress relief: "The Reginhard schoolyard in Reinickendorf demonstrates ecological and sustainable refurbishment in practice. Berlin's schoolchildren are given the balance they need to learn thanks to a schoolyard that brings joy to people and nature." (Ref. 4)
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Justice
Description of locals satisfaction with the project
Although no direct feedback from children is mentioned, the usage of the schoolyard has increased, leading to the assumption that the school children are happy with the new design and implementation: "‘The schoolyard is now used much more by the children and at the same time we are also making a contribution to Berlin's climate targets.’" (Ref. 4)
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Please specify Trade-offs & Negative impacts Selected
Unknown
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
High-quality & Transformative NBS
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
Yes
Goal setting and impacts delivery
No, although benefits were delivered in all the 3 key areas, but in the planning phase, the project did not aim to address issues in all the 3 key priority areas.
Reaching original project goals
Please specify the achievements of the project goals
Climate action:
Lowered local temperature: "This measure has improved the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate in the school playground. (Ref. 3)"

Improved stormwater management: "The degree of sealing was reduced. Of the total area of 2,850 square metres, 1,461 square metres were designed with water-permeable surfaces or unsealed. This corresponds to a degree of sealing of around 50% and a reduction in sealed surfaces of around 20% compared to the existing area. This measure has improved the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate in the school playground. (Ref. 3)"
--Achieved increased green space area: "The degree of sealing was reduced. Of the total area of ​​2,850 square meters, 1,461 square meters were designed with water-permeable surfaces or were unsealed. This corresponds to a degree of sealing of around 50 percent and a reduction in the sealed areas of around 20 percent compared to the existing area. This measure improved ecological and sustainable aspects in the schoolyard, such as the microclimate and the groundwater recharge rate." (Ref. 3)
Social justice and community:
Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: "With ecological and sustainable aspects in mind, a place was designed that allows for breaks characterised by exercise in the fresh air." (Ref. 4)

Enhanced cognitive restoration, relaxation and stress relief: "The Reginhard schoolyard in Reinickendorf demonstrates ecological and sustainable refurbishment in practice. Berlin's schoolchildren are given the balance they need to learn thanks to a schoolyard that brings joy to people and nature." (Ref. 4)
Long-term perspective
Unknown: No information about the project's long-term sustainability.
Cost-effective solutions
Unknown
Equitable impacts
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
References
1.
Senate Department for Economics, Energy and Public Enterprises (n.d.). Infoblättern zu Projekten. Accessed on September 23, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Butz, A. (n.d.). In Berlin erfolgreich für mehr Umweltgerechtigkeit – das Programm BENE Umwelt. Accessed on September 23, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
Berliner Regenwasseragentur (n.d.). Reginhard-Grundschule Umgestaltung der Außenanlage. Accessed on September 23, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Senate Department for Economics, Energy and Public Enterprises (n.d.). Europa macht Berlin – Fit für die Zukunft. Accessed on September 23, 2024, [Download];
5.
Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (n.d.). Einwohnerstand in Berlin - Grunddaten. Accessed on September 23, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Comments and notes
Comments
Only very limited information is available on the involved actors/stakeholders and how they were engaged in the implementation process.
Public Images
Image
View on to the newly designed schoolyard
The new schoolyard with trees and a new play ground
Keil Landschaftsarchitekten