1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Fort Collins
Region
Northern America
Short description of the intervention
The City of Fort Collins is "taking steps to restore flows, fish passage, and ecological function" of Colorado's Cache la Poudre River (Ref. 6). The river was "heavily manipulated for irrigation and mining" throughout the early 20th century (Ref. 6), and today continues subject to the impacts of gravel mining, agriculture and urbanisation (Ref. 1). Regional climate change predictions further complicate our ability "to understand how the river’s hydrology and ecology may respond to warming climate scenarios" (Ref. 1).
The City of Fort Collins was, therefore "invested heavily in this urban river through extensive planning efforts, purchase of approximately 700 hectares of lands within the river’s floodplain, projects to address stormwater control and conveyance, water quality management, and acquisition of in-stream flow water rights", and in 2011, the City’s Natural Areas Department published the Cache la Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan which outlined "opportunities and challenges in supporting the river’s ecological function and reducing risks to life and property during significant flood events", particularly through the implementation of nature-based solutions (Ref. 1). A suite of nature-based solutions has since been proposed and implemented by the City of Fort Collins, two of which are the Sterling Pond Ecological Restoration (also referred to as North Shields Ponds), and the McMurry Natural Area Ecological Restoration (Refs. 1 and 2).
Address

Colorado Piedmont (Great Plains)
Colorado USA
Fort Collins
United States

Area boundary
POINT (-105.106821 40.611972)
POINT (-105.106128 40.610805)
POINT (-105.101021 40.610756)
POINT (-105.100442 40.606374)
POINT (-105.095786 40.606277)
POINT (-105.095807 40.605674)
POINT (-105.100077 40.605478)
POINT (-105.095893 40.603198)
POINT (-105.088297 40.603442)
POINT (-105.08598 40.602171)
POINT (-105.08613 40.600379)
POINT (-105.092052 40.600949)
POINT (-105.095485 40.602888)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
1. Google Maps.
2. Biohabitats / Colorado River Trust, Sterling Pond Restoration Final Concept. Ref. 7 (http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf).
Total area
5673690.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2010
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2010
End date of the intervention
2015
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
"The primary objective for the Sterling Pond and McMurry Restoration projects was to remove high, artificial banks [which were] created along the riverbank during gravel mining operations" (Ref. 1). Whilst the creation of these artificial banks sought to prevent river flooding during mining activities, they caused the Cache la Poudre River and its natural processes to become "highly modified and dysfunctional", with the elevated banks resulting in "disconnect[ion] of the river from its floodplain, increased bank erosion due to increased shear stresses resulting from channel confinement, and eliminated bankside vegetation and habitat" (Ref. 1).
The project, therefore, sought to undo the channelisation of the river, recognising that the interaction between surface and groundwater is "necessary to sustain river health and habitat while providing for optimal water quality (filtration) and increased water quantities", hence the river ecosystem as a whole needed to be supported, from the river channel through to the riparian forests, and associated wetlands (Ref. 1). Through the implementation of nature-based solutions, the project sought to support "the river's ecological function[ing] and reduc[e] risks to life and property during significant flood events" (Ref. 1).
Quantitative targets
Two sub-projects are drawn upon for this case study: the Sterling Pond (North Shields) Restoration Project and the McMurry Restoration Project.

The Sterling Pond Restoration Project covered a 600 meter stretch of the Poudre River, and involved three key strategies: "lowering the high bank to widen the riparian zone and connect the river with its floodplains, creating additional shallow wetland habitat in the ponds, and removing [an] abandoned dam" (Refs. 1 & 2). The latter objective, removal of a defunct concrete dam (the Josh Ames Diversion Dam), sought to "restore natural river flow, enable fish passage, and improve the riverbed as fish habitat", hence was followed up with a modification of "approximately 150 metres of the river to mimic natural river features and gradation" (Refs. 1 & 3).

The second sub-project which constitutes this case study, the McMurry Restoration Project, concerned the McMurry Natural Area, which " is an 18-hectare site that includes an 800-metre stretch of the Cache la Poudre River and two adjacent gravel ponds" (Ref. 1). Restoration efforts targeted "lowering [of] the riverbanks, creati[on of] wetlands in the gravel ponds, and revegetati[on of] the riparian area" (Ref. 1).
Monitoring indicators defined
Unknown.
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
In order to mitigate the above sustainability challenges, the following implementation activities were undertaken:
- relevant sections of the river were re-naturalised through "significant removal of concrete, debris, and [five] old cars from the river bank placed there historically to prevent erosion" (Refs. 1 & 5);
- "steep and unnatural banks" which were constraining the river were lowered, reconnecting the river with its floodplains (Refs. 3 & 5);
- material excavated from the artificially high banks at the Sterling Pond sub-project was "placed...in the adjacent former gravel pit pond to create a mosaic of riparian woodland, wet meadow and emergent wetland" (Ref. 6);
- with both the Sterling and McMurry sites having been recognised as a "degraded ecosystem", a total of five hectares of riparian floodplain forest and several hectares of wetland were restored (Refs. 1, 2 & 3);
- in order to "increase native species diversity and enlarge the riparian forest", a total "five diverse vegetated zones were created – emergent wetland, wet meadow, willow, cottonwood, and upland grasslands" (Ref. 1);
- 1,200 trees, 25,000 shrubs and 60,000 wetland grass plugs were planted, with an emphasis being placed on planting native vegetation and floodplain trees (Ref. 1);
- removal of the Josh Ames Diversion Structure (the defunct concrete dam) sought to achieve "multiple ecological benefits including lowering river water temperatures, eliminating fish barriers, and enhancing public safety for recreational float boating" (Ref. 1);
- following removal of the dam, a pool and riffle system was created which sought to "improv[e] aquatic habitat and fish passage and allo[w] for better sediment transport" (Ref. 6);
- the natural channel width was restored, and sediment which had accumulated behind the dam was repurposed "to provide additional lateral connectivity and improved riparian habitat essential to insects, fish, birds, and other wildlife" (Ref. 6);
- in reconnecting the river with its floodplains, it was hoped that groundwater and fluvial water could interact as an ecosystem, providing flood protection and also reducing "negative physical and chemical changes" associated with low flow periods (Ref. 1);
- a pedestrian trail and designated fishing areas were installed "to facilitate public use and stewardship of the
site" (Ref. 1); and
- "At McMurry, a series of boulders placed at approximate water elevations were placed to help visitors understand the importance of functional floodplains, and the necessity of high river flows to spill out of its channel" (Ref. 1).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Other
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Parks and urban forests
Other
Please specify "other parks or (semi)natural urban green area"
Riparian forest (Ref. 1).
Please specify "other blue area"
Emergent wetland, wet meadow, willow, cottonwood, and upland grasslands" (Ref. 1).
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
1200
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
Fishing access points were also installed (Refs. 1 & 5), and "a series of boulders [were] placed at approximate water elevations...to help visitors understand the importance of functional floodplains, and the necessity of high river flows to spill out of its channel" (Ref. 1). Recreational boating was also supported through the removal of the defunct dam (Ref. 1).
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The City of Fort Collins Natural Areas Department published the Cache la Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan in 2011 and led the restoration efforts in combination with the Colorado Rivers Trust, a non-profit streamflow restoration organisation (Ref. 1). Biohabitats and their subcontractor, Budhoe Backhoe, were involved in the implementation activities (Ref. 6).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Please specify other landowner
It is important to note that the scope of the 2011 Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan under which these activities were implemented is limited to that land owned by the city / its Natural Areas Department, hence, as explained by Ref. 4, does not include management for the following areas:
- Lands along the river managed by the City’s Parks and Stormwater departments;
- Private lands along the Poudre River; nor
- Utility corridors along the Poudre River.
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan (see Ref. 4).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The project has arisen under the umbrella Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan (see Ref. 4), which, although does not specifically mention nature-based solution or green infrastructure, refers to relevant policies which highlight the need to Support Ecological Resilience; Conserve Natural Features; Provide Natural Area Protection Buffers; and Restore and Enhance (degraded or disturbed areas) (Ref. 4).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The case study mainly concerned an infrastructural innovation, characterised by re-naturalisation of the river and restoration of its associated riparian terrestrial areas.
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
It is unclear whether the initiative was copied or derived from a previous initiative.
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
It is unclear whether the initiative will be transferred to a new initiative.
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The following environmental benefits have been observed as a result of this project:
- lowered river water temperatures were observed (Ref. 1);
- restoration and flood control practices were "re-evaluated in light of the increasingly ‘flashy’ water flows" associated with climate change and uncertainty of future hydrological conditions (Ref. 1);
- equally, base river flows were restored, whereas low flow periods had previously been associated with "negative physical and chemical changes" (Ref. 1);
- "Five diverse vegetated zones were created – emergent wetland, wet meadow, willow, cottonwood, and upland grasslands", together being realised through planting of 1,200 trees, 25,000 shrubs and 60,000 wetland grasses (Ref. 1). This has increase native species diversity and enlarged the riparian forest (Ref. 1);
- fish barriers were removed (in particular the defunct dam) and ecological connectivity was restored (Ref. 1) - both water and fish can now move freely through the river section (Ref. 3);
- over 20 species of fish can now be found in the McMurry ponds, including orange spotted sunfish, smallmouth and largemouth bass, bluegills, black crappie or yellow perch (Ref. 5);
- bird species are supported, including "cedar waxwings, Bullocks orioles and even osprey, a raptor once near the brink of extinction and still relatively rare in Colorado" (Ref. 5);
- snapping turtles, rabbits, muskrats and red fox are also known to inhabit the now improved "mosaic of riparian woodland, wet meadow and emergent wetland" which also provides "essential habitat" for insects (Refs. 5 & 6);
- "a pool and riffle system ... offers improved aquatic habitat and fish passage and allows for better sediment transport" (Ref. 6); and
- lateral connectivity of habitats has been improved (Ref. 6).
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
No economic impacts have been recorded as a result of, or been accessed in relation to, this project. However, Ref. 1 does highlight how the river remains "central to [the City of Fort Collins'] community’s identity", due to it being relied upon for "as a source of drinking water, stormwater conveyance, and tourism".
Description of social and cultural benefits
Activities undertaken in relation to this case study also included the incorporation of "a number of recreational features", including the "location and development of trails and river fishing access points within the project area...and [placement of] a series of boulders...at approximate water elevations...to help visitors understand the importance of functional floodplains, and the necessity of high river flows to spill out of its channel" (Ref. 1).
Safety has also been promoted in relation to the removal of the defunct dam, as it now no longer poses a safety risk to recreational boaters (Ref. 1).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Indicators observed through implementation of this intervention include:
- number of trees planted;
- number of shrubs planted;
- number of wetland grass plugs planted;
- length of river restored;
- number of vegetated zones created; and
- area of riparian forest restored.
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of November of 2021.
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown.
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C. and Maginnis, S. (2016). Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-036.pdf [accessed 8/11/21];
2. Think Nature (n.d.). Cache La Poudre River Restoration through Partnerships. Crete, Greece: Technical University of Crete. https://platform.think-nature.eu/content/cache-la-poudre-river-restoration-through-partnerships [accessed 8/11/21];
3. Colorado Water Trust (2014). Cache la Poudre River, Before and After. Denver, Colorado: Colorado Water Trust. http://coloradowatertrust.org/2014/02/cache-la-poudre-river-before-and-after [accessed 8/11/21];
4. City of Fort Collins (2011). Cache la Poudre River: Nature Areas Management Plan Update. Fort Collins: City of Fort Collins. https://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/pdf/poudre-management-plan2011.pdf?1538669839 [accessed 8/11/21];
5. City of Fort Collins (n.d.). Natural Areas: McMurry Natural Area. Fort Collins: City of Fort Collins. https://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/finder/mcmurry [accessed 8/11/21];
6. Biohabitats (n.d.). Sterling Pond and Josh Ames Structure Ecological Restoration Design-Build. Biohabitats. https://www.biohabitats.com/project/sterling-pond-and-josh-ames-structure-ecological-restoration-design-build/ [accessed 8/11/21]; and
7. Colorado Water Trust and Biohabitats (2013). Sterling Pond Restoration Final Concept. Denver, Colorado: Colorado Water Trust. http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf [accessed 8/11/21].
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Short description:
In combination, these activities have diminished the river's "ability to scour and deposit sediment within the river channel and constrain flooding events onto the floodplain that nourish riparian vegetation with water and vital nutrients" and " modified the river’s hydrology through alterations in base flow, timing and duration of flooding events, and negative physical and chemical changes in low flow periods" (Ref. 1).
Note that the site of the Sterling Pond Ecological Restoration is also referred to as the North Shields Ponds, as the Sterling Natural Area was consolidated into the North Shields Pond Natural Area under the 2011 Cache la Poudre River: Nature Areas Management Plan Update

Urban settings: The riparian forest was targeted, as this "had been nearly lost due to the lack of flooding flows which nourish the floodplain with water, nutrients and sediment" (Ref. 1). To restore the riparian forest, five "diverse vegetated zones were created – emergent wetland, wet meadow, willow, cottonwood, and upland
grasslands" (Ref. 1).
Renaturalisation of the river, restoration of the riparian forest and reconnecting the river with its floodplains all sought to increase capacity of the green-blue ecosystem to properly function as a water management strategy (Ref. 1).
Public Images
Image
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 2
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 2 as devised by Biohabitats
http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf
Image
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 1
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 1 as devised by Biohabitats
http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf
Image
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 3
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept Section 3 as devised by Biohabitats
http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf
Image
Before and after dam removal (Josh Ames Diversion Structure) at Sterling Pond Restoration Site
Before and after dam removal (Josh Ames Diversion Structure) at Sterling Pond Restoration Site
https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-036.pdf
Image
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept
Sterling Pond Restoration Concept as devised by Biohabitats
http://coloradowatertrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sterling-Pond-Restoration-Final-Concept.pdf