1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Greater Nottingham
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Retrofit Rain Garden Project
Short description of the intervention
The scheme was designed to manage surface water runoff from a 1 in 30 year event and to always intercept and treat the, often more polluted, first flush of highway runoff (ref. 1). A total of 21 linear rain gardens (total of 148m2) were constructed within the grass verge, allowing for the constraints of access, below-ground services, street furniture and trees. The rain gardens utilise a combination of clean stone aggregate and proprietary units to create void space beneath a planted topsoil layer. They were designed to capture runoff from 5500 m2 of highway from a total surface area of 7100 m2 (ref. 1).
Address

: Ribblesdale Road
Nottingham
NG5 3HW
United Kingdom

Area boundary
POINT (-1.147515 52.99069)
POINT (-1.145477 52.991827)
POINT (-1.143932 52.992563)
POINT (-1.142151 52.993118)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Google Earth (https://www.google.com/earth/)
Total area
7100.00m²
NBS area
148.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2013
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2013
End date of the intervention
2015
Present stage of the intervention
Please specify "other" stage of the intervention
Construction work completed in 2013, with further evaluation during 2014-15. (Ref. 1, 2)
Goals of the intervention
The pilot retrofit SuDS project was designed to achieve the following objectives:
“Document and evaluate the design and construction of a series of rain gardens within an existing highway setting;
Maximise surface water interception, attenuation and infiltration;
Test the effectiveness of rain gardens in managing surface water from the public highway;
Encourage participation from local residents in the design and future management of the rain gardens;
Evaluate the effectiveness of the scheme as an engagement tool around the sources of urban diffuse pollution and flood risk; Highlight the role that retrofit SuDS can play in improving the quality and reducing the volume of surface water flowing to urban watercourses” (ref. 1)
Quantitative targets
Rain gardens: designed to capture runoff from 5500 m2 of highway from a total surface area of 7100 m2. (Ref. 1)
“The scheme was designed to manage surface water runoff from a 1 in 30 year event.” (Ref. 1)
Monitoring indicators defined
- Runoff from m2 area captured (ref. 1)
- % reduction in flow of water reaching the sewer;
- m2 of linear rain gardens constructed (ref. 1)
Implementation activities
“A total of 21 linear rain gardens (total of 148m2) were constructed within the grass verge. The scheme was designed to manage surface water runoff and to always intercept and treat the, often more polluted, first flush of highway runoff. Existing highway gullies have been retained to allow for overflow when the rain gardens reach capacity. Budget constrains meant that the use of proprietary cells was reduced and replaced by stone fill in a number of gardens. It is hoped that differences in the performance of the 2 different rain garden designs will be evaluated over the coming years” (ref. 1) The primary principle was to ensure effectiveness in managing downstream water quality and flooding. As part of this, aesthetic benefits were an important consideration, to ensure no loss of the green areas already limited within the urban environment. Part of the purpose of this pilot study was to understand the public perception and acceptability of rain gardens. (ref. 2).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Green areas for water management
Rain gardens
Sustainable urban drainage systems
What is the level of innovation / development of the NBS related to water management?
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
unknown
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Cultural services
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The pilot retrofit SuDS project was a result of collaboration between the Environment Agency (Financial; guidance; evaluation), Nottingham City Council (Construction; design; maintenance), Groundwork Greater Nottingham (Design; implementation; community liaison) and Severn Trent Water (post construction modelling). The project was initiated by Environment Agency and Nottingham City Council (ref. 1, 2)
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Citizens or community group
District/neighbourhood association
Land owners
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
EU's Water Framework Directive (WFD); Reducing/mitigating flood risks (Floods Directive). (Ref. 3)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
“Urban diffuse pollution programme across the region.” (Ref. 3)
["Within the highly urbanised area of Nottingham City, a total of 972 properties fall within the Day Brook floodplain, with previous fluvial events leading to property flooding downstream. Ribblesdale Road is parallel to some of the upper reaches of Day Brook, a heavily modified watercourse that has poor water quality due in part to numerous sources of diffuse pollution from the extensive urban catchment."] (Ref. 3)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
Sustainable Drainage Systems: “The City Council actively encourages the use of SuDS by developers and has done so for many years. The Nottingham Local Plan (Policy NE10: Water Quality and Flood Protection) states that SuDS will be required to offset any potential adverse effects of a development on flooding and the water environment.” (ref. 3) ; “Other plans, such as catchment flood management plan have been implemented since the NWRM (Natural Water Retention Measures) was implemented.” (Ref. 6)
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
21 linear rain gardens (total of 148m2) were constructed within the grass verge. stone fill was used due to budget constraints in a number of gardens (Ref 1, 2)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
A WatersideCare Group: WatersideCare group for the Brook. (Ref. 5)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
A case study (i.e. Rain Garden Nottingham) prepared by the NWRM (Natural Water Retention Measures) project under contract for the Directorate-General for Environment of the European Commission. (Ref. 3)
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Funding by the Environment Agency and Nottingham City Council, with funding of the majority of the works provided by the Environment Agency (Government funding). (Ref. 3)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
"Around 76 000 EUR:The project delivered 148m2 of rain garden which equates to £460 per m2.” (Ref. 1)
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Financing: National funds by the Environment Agency (around 76 000 EUR). (Ref. 6, 1) Staff time was also provided by Nottingham City Council and the Environment Agency. Groundwork’s time for design and community engagement was paid for by the overall project budget. The project delivered 148m2 of rain garden which equates to £460 per m2.” (Ref. 1)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
Sustainable urban drainage system, creation of rain gardens (to control the rate of runoff and water quality reaching the downstream watercourse, Day Brook). (Ref. 1-3, 6); Governance: Encourage participation from local residents in the design and future management of the rain gardens (Ref 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of the scheme as an engagement tool around the sources of urban diffuse pollution and flood risk (Ref 1) draw together statutory authorities to learn about Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and evoke change." (Ref. 2)
Please specify social innovation
"Part of the purpose of this pilot study was to understand the public perception and acceptability of rain gardens." (Ref. 3)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
It is a pilot retrofit SuDS project. (Ref. 1)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Stream restoration and SuDS in Gedling (Nottingham). (Ref. 5)
“Other plans, such as catchment flood management plan have been implemented since the NWRM (Natural Water Retention Measures) was implemented.” (Ref. 6)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
- Modelled 33% reduction in flow reaching the sewer for 1 in 1 year event
- possible increases to infiltration to groundwater from rain gardens, providing groundwater recharge and baseflows to the brook. However the influence is likely to be minor.
- Rain gardens are designed to intercept and treat the, often more polluted, first flush of highway runoff, ensuring this polluted water does not reach the Day Brook or the local sewer. There is however no exact available data for the quality of water flowing into or within the rain gardens following implementation of the project (ref. 5).
- reduced peak flows reaching the local sewer, as water was slowed and contained in the gardens
A total of 21 linear rain gardens (total of 148m2) were constructed within the grass verge. (Ref 3)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Increased understanding and awareness of the benefits of retrofit SuDS at a community and partner level (ref. 1)
Aesthetic benefits were an important consideration, to ensure no loss of the green areas already limited within the urban environment. Part of the purpose of this pilot study was to understand the public perception and acceptability of rain gardens. (ref. 2).
“The scheme has been designed to facilitate ongoing evaluation of the rain gardens.” (Ref. 1) It is hoped that differences in the performance of the 2 different rain garden designs will be evaluated over the coming years”. (Ref. 1)
“A survey of local residents was undertaken. The 17 residents who responded to the survey (25% response rate) have provided a mixed picture of opinions. Some residents remain incredibly supportive of the scheme and are “absolutely delighted” with the finished rain gardens. Others dislike the rain gardens and feel that, in particular, they have taken away parking space or created a hazard for pedestrians or cyclists.” (Ref. 1)
SuDS retrofit scheme delivered through partnership (institutional partnership) (ref. 1); some residents felt the rain gardens took away parking spots for cars, some thought they were created in such a way that they were hazards to cyclists or pedestrians (Ref 1)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Monitoring: Data logger installed beneath two of the rain gardens, allows for continuous water depth recording. (Ref. 3)
Initial results from the InfoWorks CS 2D model of the scheme suggests a 33% reduction in the flow reaching the sewer during a 1 in 1 return period storm. (Ref. 1)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
"A Survey was undertaken of local residents following implementation to understand opinions and acceptance of rain gardens since construction." (Ref. 3)
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
“A survey of local residents was undertaken. The 17 residents who responded to the survey (25% response rate) have provided a mixed picture of opinions. Some residents remain incredibly supportive of the scheme and are “absolutely delighted” with the finished rain gardens. Others dislike the rain gardens and feel that, in particular, they have taken away parking space or created a hazard for pedestrians or cyclists.” (Ref. 1)
COVID-19 pandemic
No information found as of July 23, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
“Continuous water level monitoring is allowing a short period of data to be collected post-implementation, and will allow future monitoring of any variation in rain garden performance. InfoWorks CS 2D modelling has been undertaken since implementation, to model the anticipated reduction in the flow reaching the sewer based on the data logger information.” (Ref. 3)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
"A Survey was undertaken of local residents following implementation to understand opinions and acceptance of rain gardens since construction." (Ref. 3)
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
“A survey of local residents was undertaken. The 17 residents who responded to the survey (25% response rate) have provided a mixed picture of opinions. Some residents remain incredibly supportive of the scheme and are “absolutely delighted” with the finished rain gardens. Others dislike the rain gardens and feel that, in particular, they have taken away parking space or created a hazard for pedestrians or cyclists.” (Ref. 1)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Yes
Please specify
“The scheme has been designed to facilitate ongoing evaluation of the rain gardens.” (Ref. 1) It is hoped that differences in the performance of the 2 different rain garden designs will be evaluated over the coming years”. (Ref. 1)
References
List of references
1. Susdrain. (n.d.) Greening streets, retrofit rain gardens, Nottingham. Case study. Accessed 17 July 2020. Available at: https://www.susdrain.org/case-studies/case_studies/greening_streets_retrofit_rain_gardens_nottingham.html
2. European Commission. (2013). Case study Rain Garden Nottingham. Final Version. Accessed 17 July 2020. Available at: http://nwrm.eu/sites/default/files/case_studies_ressources/cs-uk-04-final_version.pdf
3. Nottingham City Council. (n.d.) Lead Local Flood Authority. Accessed 17 July 2020. Available at: https://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/information-for-business/environmental-health-and-safer-housing/flooding/lead-local-flood-authority
4. Restoring Europe's Rivers. (n.d.). Case study:Day Brook Rain Gardens. Accessed 17 July 2020. Available at: https://restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Case_study%3ADay_Brook_Rain_Gardens
5. NWRM European Commission. (n.d.) Rain gardens for the Day Brook, UK. Case Study. Natural Water Retention Measures. Accessed 17 July 2020. Available at: http://nwrm.eu/case-study/rain-gardens-day-brook-uk
Additional comments
"The scheme was designed to manage surface water runoff from a 1:30 year event and to always intercept and treat the, often more polluted, first flush of highway runoff" (ref. 1)-- '1:30 year event' is mentioned throughout the project's website and no description was given for this figure but it is assumed to mean 1 in 30-year event.
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
retrofitting rain gardens
Rain gardens in Nottingham
https://www.susdrain.org/case-studies/case_studies/greening_streets_retrofit_rain_gardens_nottingham.html