1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Iaşi (FUA)
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Reabilitarea zonei umede Ciobarciu
Short description of the intervention
The "Ciobarciu wetland" project resulted in the creation of a wetland area of ​​about 224 hectares near the city of Iasi (30 Km distance). The area of ​​nature thus became in spring and autumn a significant resting place for migratory birds, and the specific types of natural vegetation are growing again, constituting a natural habitat for the locales specific to these places. The project was developed by the National Administration of the Romanian Waters alongside the Dutch Government in order to restore the area and to include it in the ecosystem of the place (1)
Address

Iasi
Romania

Total area
2240000.00m²
NBS area
2240000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
1998
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2003
End date of the intervention
2006
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
1. Wetlands function like a sponge, soaking up water that comes in with the tides, or from periodically flooding rivers;
2. Provide a wildlife nursery;
3. To provide a pollution filter;
4. To increase access to wildlife, pristine ecosystems;
5. To provide a storm buffer for the area;
6. Between bird watching, biking, hiking, and kayaking, wetlands provide people with many ways to enjoy nature;
7. To provide fertile farmland: Many commercially important fish species, reeds and papyrus are also harvested in wetlands;
8. Raising the water level of the embanked area with a regulating water outlet structure;
9. Creation of a variety of habitats -from dry land to spots with deep water by digging;
10. Regulation of hydrological cycle and water flow;
11. Biodiversity and gene-pool conservation in riparian areas (2,3).
Quantitative targets
1. To create 250 ha of wetland;
2. To protect the 105 bird species;
3. There are 400 landowners impacted by this intervention ;
4. Improve life quality for over 8000 people in the immediate vicinity and for another 300.000 (tourists from Iasi) (3).
Monitoring indicators defined
1. Amount of terrain restored
2. Number of people who benefit from the intervention
3. Prospective number of tourists
4. Number of species protected (3)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
October 2003 - Land evaluation.
• 2005-2006 - Land purchase of 224ha grassland from approximately 400 landowners.
• Community participated in scheme design.
• Channels created between embankments to improve connectivity, inner embankments removed completely.
• Restoration of old meanders.
• Restored flow on the Old Jijia River. (4)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Noise reduction
Flood regulation
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Tourism
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Application was initiated by Apele Romane. (Prut Directorate) - regional water authority in the Northeast of Romania with the support of: 'Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Support Treatment (RIZA), 'Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management) (1) Apele Romane (Prut Directorate) is a subsidiary of the Romanian Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests and it is coordinated by it. The initiative has been partly supported by the Dutch Government whose role limited to finances.
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Public sector institution
Non-government organisation/civil society
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
This intervention was related to the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora and it was seen as a prerequisite for Romania's adherence to the EU in 2007. (6)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
This NBS was part of a larger restoration plan, a project entitled "Modeling, Monitoring and Reconstruction in the Prut River Basin", that dealt with problems related to the quantitative and qualitative management of surface water and ecological reconstruction. (1)
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Some modelling/feasbility study was done before the restoration of the wetland that consisted in the field works in the polders, and also an inventory of the species (3)
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The initiative is part of PIN-MATRA - Dutch governmental fund to protect and rehabilitate areas for nature in Eastern European countries of € 254.141,- (66%); The project partners supply the rest of the costs, namely: Apele Romane 22,900 EUR (6%); RIZA 87,100 EUR (22%);Het Drentse Landschap 23,712 EUR (6%) (5)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
388.000 EU
Please specify other source of funding
Fund provided by the Dutch Government
Non-financial contribution
No
Please specify technological innovation
Pre-EU, since before 2007, there were not other wetlands taking into consideration for rehabilitation, except the Danube Delta. As such, restoring an area of a considerable size and protecting its diversity, instead of transforming it into a terrain that might be used for different purposes or just abandoned, makes it a product innovation (3)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
There is no mentioning of this NBS as being transferred from a previous initiative (1)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The project results and relations developed were used as input for other projects and for new project proposals in the framework of the Dutch-Romanian collaboration. E.g. The Integrated Water Management (flood risk management, drinking water and wastewater) planning for the Tecucel river basin (2008-2011) built on some of the relations that were developed in the participatory planning and implementation for the restoration of the Ciobarciu wetland project. (2)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The NBS reported the following environmental benefits (local habitats for local species and reduction of biodiversity loss):
The NBS contributed to the quality improvement of an important migratory route for waterbirds. The perimeter was used for seeking food by the birds during the migration period. The birds fauna list consisted of 105 species, out of which 29 bird species and 19 species are present in the Romanian Red Book of Vertebrates. (2007-2008) No available data for fauna, excepting the fishes presence after about 1 year from the flooding 8 fish species were recorded. During field observations different aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates groups, amphibians, reptiles and some small mammals were observed;
Increased underground water level. (Ref.1).
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Positive outcomes closely related to the implementation of the measure:
 Increased possibility of non-commercial fishing
 Increased possibilities for horticulture along the Old Jijia
Additional positive impacts:
 Increased agriculture/horticulture along the Old Jijia
 Increased tourism, leading to potential economical benefits originating from the interest of investors (Ref.1).
Social and cultural impacts
Description of social and cultural benefits
Unknown
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of August 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
-assessing the biophysical impacts : Field observations during two summers, 2007-2008. Birds' monitoring: transect method, observation from fixed point, males' sound's counting and band counting (for waders and aquatic birds)
- methods used to assess costs: No economic and financial analysis was carried out prior or after the implementation of the project
because of the emphasis on wetlands restoration and biodiversity conservation, as opposed to revenue generation. (2)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
The project was evaluated at the end of the project by the project team (2006) and by a Romanian University of Iasi, who interviewed 55 inhabitants of villages where the (previous) owners lived. After a period of five years, the project was evaluated again by a researcher. In the spring 2007 birds’ monitoring program started, in order to propose the new wetland for a protected status in the national Natura 2000 network. (2)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Yes
Please specify
At the end of the project and five years later, the wetland was functioning well but in between it had not been functioning for a period of two years due to construction works. The absence of water in this period had been a disaster for the biodiversity of the
area. In the evaluation in 2011 some of the outcomes could not be attributed easily to the project. For example, the improved cooperation between the regional water authority and other actors, the development of ideas for additional wetlands and the existence of courses on ecological restoration at the university may have resulted partly from the project but were certainly also the result of other factors, such as the implementation of EU directives. (2)
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
Ciobarciu Final Project (881.83 KB) 881.83 KB
Ciobarciu impacts (3.88 MB) 3.88 MB
Case study of the wetland (171.15 KB) 171.15 KB
List of references
1. ANANP (no date), Ziua Mondială a Zonelor Umede: Conservarea biodiversității aduce bunăstare oamenilor!, Available at http://ananp.gov.ro/ziua-mondiala-a-zonelor-umede-conservarea-biodiversitatii-aduce-bunastare-oamenilor-2/ (Accessed 24-8-2020)

2. European Commission, Ciobarciu Wetland restoration, Natural Water Retention Measures, Available at http://nwrm.eu/sites/default/files/case_studies_ressources/cs-ro-01-final_version.pdf (Accessed 24-8-2020)

3. National Administration (2014), "Romanian Water" Prut Water Branch Iasi, Ciobarciu Wetland Project, Available at http://www.riob.org/IMG/pdf/NWRM-RR_Workshop_Th-2_Dan_Badarau.pdf (Accessed 24-8-2020)

4. Prut-Barlad River Authority in Romania, Ciobarciu Wetland Project, Available at http://www.ecrr.org/Portals/27/Ciobarciu%20case%20study.pdf (Accessed 24-8-2020)

5. BZI (2006), Proiect ecologic ambitios inaugurat de ambasadorul Olandei, Available at https://www.bzi.ro/proiect-ecologic-ambitios-inaugurat-de-ambasadorul-olandei-72873 (Accessed 24-8-2020)
Comments and notes
Additional insights
The intervention mentions that the results of the birds' monitoring program started during the spring of the year 2007 were done in order to propose this new wetland for a protected status in the national Natura 2000 network. (4)
Public Images
Image
Panoramic view of the wetland
View of the wetland
https://www.google.com/search?q=zona+umeda+ciobarciu+poze&rlz=1C1CHBF_enRO880RO880&sxsrf=ALeKk00hx9yRBQsSGE-AT6GqN5S5brcviw:1598260908936&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRzfDtwbPrAhWtw4sKHWBWAyAQ_AUoAnoECAsQBA&biw=1280&bih=561#imgrc=3nWlqmyKzd3biM