1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Leeds
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
MoorLIFE
Short description of the intervention
The South Pennine Moors is a conservation area in the Natura 2000 network. This site is crucial for active blanket bog and is part of two Special Protection Areas in the Birds Directive, including golden plover, dunlin, short-eared owl and merlin, dependent on the blanket bog for breeding and feeding. The conservation status of the site is threatened due to sulphate and nitrate pollution, causing severe depletion of crucial sphagnum moss cover. Fire damage has led to more extreme erosion than if the moorlands had remained sphagnum-rich. The restoration of favourable conditions thereby depends on re-establishing a sphagnum-rich bog. (3)
The project included three Natura 2000 sites, the Peak District Moors (South Pennine Moors Phase 1), South Pennine Moors Phase 2 and South Pennine Moors (3).
Address

South Pennine Moors
Leeds City Region
Leeds
United Kingdom

Area boundary
POINT (-1.754899 53.340973)
Source of NBS area image
The project included three Natura 2000 sites, the Peak District Moors (South Pennine Moors Phase 1), South Pennine Moors Phase 2 and South Pennine Moors (3), and it is not possible to know exactly the locations of these sites. The GIS location marks the center of the Peak District National Park.
Total area
16000000.00m²
NBS area
16000000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2007
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2010
End date of the intervention
2015
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
-The main objective of the MoorLIFE project was to protect 1600ha of active blanket bog in the South Pennine Moors by reducing erosion on adjacent degraded peatland. To achieve this, the project aimed to restore 862ha of active blanket bog through stabilisation, diversification and gully blocking.
-To ensure the future sustainability of the blanket bog, the project also aimed to carry out wildfire mitigation actions while also raising public awareness of wildfire risk and restoration.
-The final objective was to develop knowledge and understanding by effective communication to practitioners and policymakers. The project emphasised the importance of fully-functioning upland moorlands in providing a range of ecosystem services, such as clean drinking water, carbon capture and storage to mitigate climate change, recreation, and flood mitigation, through which important socio-economic benefits are derived from the MoorLIFE project’s activities. (3, 13)
Quantitative targets
- 200,000 plugs of plants through the method of micro-propagation to increase biodiversity (included cloudberry, hare's-tail cotton grass, common cotton grass, bilberry, crowberry, cross-leaved heath) (13)
- Protect the 1600ha of active blanket bog in the South Pennine Moors (by reducing the erosion on adjacent degraded peatland)
- Restore 862ha of active blanket bog (through stabilisation, diversification and gully blocking) (3)
Monitoring indicators defined
- Increase and stabalise the ha area of active blanket bog (see above) (3)
- Increase biodiversity through new vegetation planted (see above)
- Reduce the amount of bare peat (13)
Please specify "other Habitats and biodiversity conservation activity"
Wildfire mitigation (3, 13)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The duration of the project (reference: LIFE08 NAT/UK/000202) lasted from 01-APR-2010 to 31-AUG -2015. (3) Bare peat areas on the site were re-stabilised by installing 52 km's of geotextiles and helicoptering in 11,000 bags of heather cuttings (brash) and spreading them, to re-establish plant growth. To kick-start, the re-vegetation process, 1,900 tonnes of lime (3000 in total) and fertiliser was applied and 22 tonnes of grass and heather seeds sown (43 in total). Additionally, 150,000 moorland plants such as bilberry and cotton grass were introduced, as well as a futher 30,000 plug plants and 807 million fragments of Sphagnum. As part of the gully blocking exercise, 4,000 dams were installed. (12)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Carbon storage/sequestration
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Recreation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The MoorLIFE project was delivered by the Moors for the Future Partnership (MFFP) and led by the beneficiary Peak District National Park Authority. (3) It was delivered by Moors for the Future Partnership and co-funded by the European Commission’s Life+ Programme. Partners included Environment Agency, Natural England, National Trust, United Utilities and Yorkshire Water. (12) Individual landowners and managers in the Peak District realised that the problem of moorland erosion could not be tackled by one organisation alone and in February 2003 the Moors for the Future Partnership was formed. (1)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
EU body
Multilateral organisation
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
Natura 2000 - that provides the basis for the MoorLife NBS intervention - is the name of a Europe-wide network of reserves for the conservation of endangered plant and animal species. The basis of this reserves network is the EU directive on the conservation of natural habitats and wild animals and plants, known as the Habitats Directive (the Council’s 92/43/EEC of 21st May 1992), and the directive on the conservation of wild birds (the Council’s 79/409/EEC of 2nd April 1979). These two directives commit the EU member states to designate and maintain a number of reserves which can help to conserve throughout Europe the diversity both of wild animal and plant species and of natural and near-natural habitats. (8) The South Pennine Moors include golden plover, dunlin, short-eared owl and merlin as special species under these directives and are dependent on blanket bog - the central concerns of the project - for breeding and/or feeding at the Moors. (10, 13)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The MoorLife intersects with the Leeds City Region's Green Infrastructure Plan through its own Live Moor/Learn Moor project that intends to increase the scope of the South Pennine Moors Project by directing green infrastructure investment into a new large scale landscape restoration scheme that offers multiple green infrastructure benefits. Upper river catchment water management and carbon sequestration and storage through re-seeding peat will be a particular focus for the project. Project design will place significant emphasis on restoring unique moorland habitats and enhancing the legibility and interpretation of historic features in the landscape. (15, 16)
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
150,000 moorland plants such as bilberry and cotton grass were introduced, as well as a futher 30,000 plug plants and 807 million fragment of Sphagnum. (13)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The MoorLife project covered local and municipal authorities and included from across the Yorkshire and Humberside region, such the Environment Agency in Derbyshire, Natural England, National Trust, United Utilities and Yorkshire Water, Pennine Prospects. (1)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The EU made a contribution of €5,018,142 to the project on the basis of the application made by the NGO-Foundation Peak District National Park Authority. (5)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Please specify other co-financing type
The EU made a contribution of €5,018,142 to the project on the basis of the application made by the NGO-Foundation Peak District National Park Authority. (5)
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
€6,690,856.00
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
€6,690,856.00 (€5,018,142.00 EU contribution) (3)
Project partner contributions:
Environment Agency – €101,000
Natural England – €241,000
United Utilities – €580,000
Yorkshire Water – €482,000
National Trust – €242,000
and the lead partner, Peak District
National Park Authority – €37,000. (13)
Meanwhile Moors for the Future Partnership that provided the basis for this project was formed in February 2003, supported by a 3.2 million Landscape Partnership from Heritage Lottery Fund. (14)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Type of innovation
Please specify technological innovation
The project emphasised the importance of fully-functioning upland moorlands in providing a range of ecosystem services, such as clean drinking water, carbon capture and storage to mitigate climate change, recreation, and flood mitigation, through which important socio-economic benefits are derived from the MoorLIFE project’s activities. (3, 13)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Because of past industrial pollution, the Sphagnum mosses which form the peat of the project area were virtually eradicated. Therefore, innovative new methods of reintroducing them were developed during the course of the project. Eleven species of Sphagnum mosses were propagated using the same micro-propagation techniques used for growing plug plants. They were chopped into fragments and spread in one of the following ways:
• Where wide-scale application was needed they were placed in a protective bead (propagule) and applied directly onto the peat. It takes two to three years for the fragments to become established.
• Another wide-scale technique was trialled using bigger fragments of Sphagnum suspended in a nutrient-rich gel which was sprayed from a backpack. It is hoped that these fragments will become established quicker.
• Where a targeted approach was required, the fragments were grown in a greenhouse as plugs which formed mini-hummocks that were planted out by hand. (13)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The project undertook the first carbon audit of moorland conservation works and the toolkit developed, including methodology, is available for use by other projects. New ways of Sphagnum application were developed for use in different situations. Continuing monitoring will provide vital information to inform best practice, and thus inform the further replicability/transferability of the project's methodology. (13) Meanwhile the MoorLIFE 2020 follows this previous LIFE funded 2010-2015 MoorLIFE Project. After five years, this has revegetated nearly 900 hectares of bare peat to protect about 2, 500 hectares of Active Blanket Bog (roughly the size of 3,500 football pitches); the follow-up MoorLIFE project aims to handle the remaining issues in protecting Active Blanket Bog. (2)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Expected impacts based on the following information about activities:
- 200,000 plugs of plants through the method of micro-propagation to increase biodiversity (included cloudberry, hare's-tail cotton grass, common cotton grass, bilberry, crowberry, cross-leaved heath) (13);
- Protect the 1600ha of active blanket bog in the South Pennine Moors by reducing the erosion on adjacent degraded peatland (3);
- Restore 862ha of active blanket bog (through stabilisation, diversification and gully blocking) (3);
- 22 tonnes of grass and heather seeds sown (43 in total) (12);
- 150,000 moorland plants such as bilberry and cotton grass were introduced, as well as a further 30,000 plug plants and 807 million fragments of Sphagnum (12);
- 4,000 dams were installed to control flooding (12).

Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Opportunities for recreation and socio-economic benefits are derived from the MoorLIFE project’s activities. (3, 13)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Area of restored bog (3); reduction of bare peat following the conservation work (3); tonnes of grass and heather seeds sown (12); number of moorland plants such as bilberry and cotton grass planted (12); number of installed dams to control flooding (12).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
The project tracks the area restored, vegetation planted, damn to control flooding (3,12,13)
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of 7 October 2020
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
The apps are the first moorland-themed identification guides that have been created to help visitors learn about the importance of the Peak District National Park and South Pennine moors. The apps provide information about the work carried out by the Moors for the Future Partnership within the MoorLIFE project and how that is helping to restore and preserve these moorland habitats which are of European importance. The apps consist of the following:

MoorMOSS - looks at Sphagnum mosses found in the Peak District and South Pennines.
MoorPLANTS – a guide to ferns, flowering herbs, shrubs, trees and grasses.
MoorSIGHTS - gives you a feel for some of the types of landscape features you are likely to encounter on a walk across the moors.
MoorWILD - focuses on the birds, insects, mammals and reptiles found on the moors. (9)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
No
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
No
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
(1) Moors for the Future Partnership. [no date]. Moors for the Future - investing in our landscape: About Us. http://www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk/about-us [Accessed 7 October]
(2) Moors for the Future Partnership. (2015). MoorLIFE 2020: Technical Summary. [Document attached]
(3) Commission. [no date]. MoorLIFE - MoorLIFE: Active blanket bog restoration in the South Pennine Moors. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.dspPage&n_proj_id=3539 [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(4) Moors for the Future Partnership. (2015). Successful 5-year conservation project protects 2,500 hectares of moorland. [Website unavailable in 2020]
(5) Bennett, Ken. (2017). Countryside comes closer thanks to ‘bogtastic’ exhibition van. http://saddind.co.uk/countryside-comes-closer-thanks-to-bogtastic-exhibition-van/ [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(6) BBC. (2015). Peak District gets about £12m to protect moorlands. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-34474985 [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(7) Commission. (2008). Nature & Biodiversity: Projects 2008. [Website unavailable in 2020, Document attached]
(8) Vogel Paradies Weidmoos. [no date]. Aims of the project. http://www.weidmoos.at/en/daslifeprojekt/index.html [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(9) Peak District National Park. (2015). First moorland-themed apps launched. http://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/learning-about/news/archive/2015/news/first-moorland-themed-apps-launched [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(10) Commission. [no date]. MoorLIFE : Moorland conservation programme on the South Pennine Moors, UK. http://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/metadata/projects/moorland-conservation-programme-on-the-south-pennine-moors-uk [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(11) Natural England. [no date]. South Pennine Moors SSSI. https://designatedsites.naturalengland.org.uk/SiteDetail.aspx?SiteCode=s1007196 [Accessed 7 October 2020]
(12) IUCN. [no date]. Bleaklow (MoorLIFE Project). [Website unavailable in 2020]
(13) Moors for the Future Partnership. [no date]. LAYMAN’S REPORT 2010–2015: MoorLIFE. [Document attached]
(14) UK Landscape Award. (2010). UK Landscape Award 2010: Moors for the Future Partnership Award Statement. [Document attached]
(15) LDA Design. (2010). Leeds city region: intelligence driving growth: Green infrastructure Strategy. Oxford. LDA Design. [Document attached]
(16) Rochdale Borough Council. (2012). Appendix C: Pennines Green Infrastructure Action Plan Schedule of Changes. [Document attached]
(17)Yorkshire live (2016) Multi-million pound scheme to revamp moors above Huddersfield https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/multi-million-pound-scheme-revamp-11362498 [Accessed 7 October 2020]
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)
Image
Live Moor (1)
Live Moor (1)