1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Ljubljana
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
The recreational and educational centre (RIC) area along the Sava river stretches from Tomačevo to Sneberje and totals 144,618 sqm. The area is intended for children, people with disabilities and other residents of the region, visitors and tourists. The intervention made this once degraded, illegal dumping area attractive for those seeking recreation, visitors and tourists, also in the evening as street lighting was installed along the path powered by photovoltaics. A large children's playground offers free socializing and children can develop their basic motor skills, which is exceptionally important in life's early years. (1)
Address

Dajnkova ulica 56, 1000 Ljubljana, Eslovênia
1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia

Total area
144618.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Riverbanks
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2008
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2010
End date of the intervention
2019
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The goal of the project was to revitalise the informal waste site on the banks of the river Sava and connect the sport and recreational centres on the Sava with the already functioning ones in the city. In addition, the project aimed at connecting bike and pedestrian paths along the entire Sava bank area in Slovenia. (1 and 2)

Quantitative targets
144,618 square metres of revitalised area, 10 picnic sites, 3 equestrian trails (1 and 2)
Monitoring indicators defined
sqm metres of cleaned area, number of picnic sites and number of riding trails ( 1 and 2)
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
The implementation activities include building horse riding area, picnic space, children playground, small animal farm and biking and pedestrian paths with illumination. The banks were consolidated and applied gravel to the Sava beach. In Ježica, near the tennis courts, next to the stage dam Ljubljana got a new beach. Sava Recreation and Education Center got upgraded. (1 and 2)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Green playgrounds and school grounds
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
Horse riding area, picnic space, small animal farm and biking and pedestrian paths with illumination. (1 and 2)
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The main initiative was taken by the City of Ljubljana. Playground was developed based on the initiative of the Prostoroz civic initiative. (1 and 2)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Citizens or community group
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The project is funded partially by the EU funds for Regional Development, suggesting the project is complementary to EU strategies, but none of the documents refers specifically to which.
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Ljubljana Vision 2025
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Consolidation of the banks: unknown, a new beach along the Sava: € 270,000, up-gradation of the Sava Recreation and Education Center:1.065.947 € and revival of the degraded area along the Sava: 1.515.206 € (2)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
1. Carniolan wall was built which strengthens the bank in the area.
2. Set up an outdoor ecological toilet, which promotes the reuse of the biomass by composting.
3. 150,000 m2 of forested areas were built.
4. The project has converted a previously emptied sand waste space into a recreational area for all to enjoy. This also has protected the degraded soil and turned into an aesthetically pleasing place. (1 and 2)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
1. The project is expected to bring more tourism to the area. (1 and 2)
Description of social and cultural benefits
1. Access to the river has improved.
2. Walking and cycling (6km) routes along the right bank encourages the citizens to use the space more and promotes physical activity.
3. Photovoltaic lighting next to the existing building (RIC Sava) provides safety to the residents to use the area during the night.
4. Children's playground, climbing wall, trim devices, a disc golf course, an equestrian polygon provides a pace for recreation and relaxation. (1 and 2)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
144,618 square metres of revitalised area, 10 picnic sites, 3 equestrian trails (2)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of November, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Mini survey on the website of the intervention, asking visitors whether they have been to or planning to visit the path along the Sava.
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Green Ljubljana. RIC Sava. (2016) available at http://www.greenljubljana.com/funfacts/sava-recreational-and-educational-centre-ric-sava [website under construction as on 3rd November, 2020]
2. Ljubljana Municipality. Revitalize Sava. available at https://www.ljubljana.si/sl/moja-ljubljana/ljubljana-zate/projekti-mol/ozivitev-bregov-save/. accessed on 3rd November, 2020.
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Municipality of Ljubljana intended that the pedestrian paths extend all the way to Serbia where Sava entres Danube, but there does not seem to be much cooperation going on regional on that (2).
Public Images
Image
Sava RIC restoration
City of Ljubljana
https://www.ljubljana.si/sl/moja-ljubljana/ljubljana-zate/projekti-mol/ozivitev-bregov-save/