1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Murcia
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Recuperacion Ambiental del Rio Segura
Short description of the intervention
This intervention involved the removal of sediment and revitalization of the banks along with the rehabilitation of the urban part of the Segura River in Murcia. This was done to strengthen the environmental condition of the river and improve the visual aspects and the access of citizens to the river (Ref 3 and 7). In 2020, they are building the second part of the project, where the aim is to build three different walkways that join the two sides of the rivers and that will connect specific places along with it (Ref 5).
Address

Rio Segura
Murcia
Spain

Total area
11180.00m²
NBS area
11180.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Natural Area
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2005
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2009
End date of the intervention
ongoing
Present stage of the intervention
Please specify "other" stage of the intervention
2009- Viability study carried out and published (ref 1)
2011- Proposals follow for infrastructure building
2016- Announcement of a new project Murcia Rio, which furthers the works along the river banks by adding infrastructure for leisure activities (ref 3)
Goals of the intervention
The first part of the project included the following goals:
-Augment the hydrological capacity of the river;
-Improve the habitat and fauna;
-Eliminate the negative visual impact of the growth on sediments along the urban section of the river;
-Improve the current setting and conditions for carrying out recreational activities in the area. (ref 1)

The second part of the project has the main goal of: "recover the spaces for the Murcian families with the river as the central axis" of this. To do so, there will be several projects involved: New Recreation, sport, and cultural zones, as well as the recovery of the natural, landscape, and biodiversity spaces (ref 5 and 6).

Quantitative targets
Drainage/ maintenance of 90 600 m3 of river water and sediment.
Monitoring indicators defined
Condition of native species;
Condition of river section (river bed, transversal profile, connection of subterraenean waters);
Continuation of the river (longitude);
Temperature of the water;
Condition of oxygen in the water;
Salination of water;
Condition of nutrients;
Amount of contaminants in the water (ref 2).
Please specify "other Habitats and biodiversity restoration activity"
Create more green areas for the biodiversity to be restored.
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
First, draining of sections of the river. The draining of an area of 90 600 m3 of sediments along the river is projected, it will be performed with a suction drainage system. A month before the process starts, a bioremediation treatment will be applied to the sediment areas to avoid any odours coming up during the suction process. The pre-treatment is followed by the installation of tubes for drainage, after which the drained sediment will be treated, concrete structures will be erected to facilitate the movement of equipment and the sediment will be deposited and transported away. The actions will finish with the demolition of installations and the transfer of equipment and residues so that the areas can be restituted to their original state.
During the intervention, the water will be redirected through installations, and when the waterway is restored the ecological aspect of the river’s path will be restored. (ref 1)2016- Announcement of a new project Murcia Rio, which furthers the works.
In the second phase, the plan is to include more green areas which can be useful for recreation, sport, and cultural activities.
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Railroad bank and track greens
Green playgrounds and school grounds
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Green areas for water management
Sustainable urban drainage systems
Please specify "other green areas for water management"
Drainage of riverbank sediment
What is the level of innovation / development of the NBS related to water management?
Vegetation Type
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Air quality regulation
Carbon storage/sequestration
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Inspiration for culture, art and design
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The Murcia city government along with the Confederation of the Segura River led this initial intervention. The Confederation of the Segura is a public law entity with its own legal personality and that has autonomy to govern and administer the environmental and heritage affairs of the Segura river (ref 1).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Citizens or community group
Land owners
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
The plan Murcia Rio and its preliminary studies are in accordance to the National Hydrological Plan, the Spanish government level plan of the waterways and bodies of water of the country. It is also part of the article 46.5 of the Law of Waters. (ref 1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The Murcia River Plan for the reconditioning of the river along the urban area has followed this intervention, so it is not an influence but a cause (ref 3)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project is in accordance with the National Strategy of River Restauration (ref 1).
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
Viability study carried out and published by the Murcia Municipality for the project. (ref 4)
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
Green areas for natural space, landscape and biodiversity of the river trying to recreate the previous vegetation of the river (Ref 10).
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The Confederation of the Segura River is the national network and management body of river and water ways in the country. (ref 1 and 3)

The standards of Natura 2000 network were consulted and considered to evaluate the impact of the intervention on the environment. (ref 1)
“Natura 2000 is a network of core breeding and resting sites for rare and threatened species, and some rare natural habitat types which are protected in their own right. It stretches across all 28 EU countries, both on land and at sea. The aim of the network is to ensure the long-term survival of Europe's most valuable and threatened species and habitats, listed under both the Birds Directive and the Habitats Directive.” (Natura home site)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Please specify
The public authority financed the intervention.
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The total cost is presented at 4 967 870 euro (ref 1) from the first project. There has been progressive investments through out the years. Currently, it is 99.249.504,86 € from the municipality and 70.714.670,57 € from the fund (ref 9).
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
No
Please specify other Business model
Cohesion politics is the model used. The goal of it is to impulse the socioeconomic cohesion in the European Union by correcting the imbalances between the regions (Ref 9). It wants to promote public investment in specific priority areas by providing further funding support.
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify technological innovation
The intervention process is described as the most environmentally viable and least aggressive to the surrounding, thus being an innovative and favorable approach to the action of removing sediment from a river bank. (ref 1)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project expects to have impacts on the recovery of the natural landscape and biodiversity protection (Ref 4), while decreasing the CO2 in the atmosphere in the area of a very anthropogenically damaged part of the Segura River. As there were a lot of invasive species, this recovery efforts also expect to decrease the water and air pollution while increasing natural green spaces of the area(Ref 3).
For the first part of the project, with the cleaning of the river banks it's expected to remove 9300 m3 of drained sediment (regeneration, habitats, environmental quality). (ref 1)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Familiar zones are created for recreational activities, as well as for them to access a natural healthy environment. In these zones relaxation, recreation, cultural and sport activities are promoted (Ref 3).

Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Amount of drained sediment ( 9300 m3) (ref 1)

Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
The Segura River is becoming less of a natural river, and it is getting more artificial. Also, there is a concern for the amount of waste of money that did not achieve to prevent waste management in the region (L.O., 2019)
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of July of 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Network of Custody of the Territory
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Gobierno de España. (2009). Proyecto de Obras de Recuperacion Ambiental del Rio Segura en la Ciudad de Murcia, Termino Municipal de Murcia. Murcia: Gobierno de España. Available at: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/agua/planes-y-estrategias/informes-de-viabilidad-de-obras-hidraulicas/rio_segura_tcm30-82514.pdf (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
2. Gobierno de España. (2015). Plan Hidrografico de la Cuenca del Segura 2009/2015. Murcia: Gobierno de España. Available at: https://www.chsegura.es/export/descargas/planificacionydma/planificacion/docsdescarga/Memoria-PHCS-2009_2015.pdf (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
3. Europa Press. (2016). Acuerdo para materializar el proyecto Murcia Río y crear una avenida verde y de ocio familiar en la ribera del Segura. Murcia: EuropaPress. Available at: http://www.europapress.es/murcia/noticia-acuerdo-materializar-proyecto-murcia-rio-crear-avenida-verde-ocio-familiar-ribera-segura-20160429135545.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
4. Gobierno de España (n.d.). Proyecto de recuperación ambiental del río Segura y tramo comprendido entre los Sotos de los Álamos y la Hijuela. T.M. de Molina de Segura y Alguazas (Murcia). Murcia: Gobierno de España. Available at: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/agua/temas/delimitacion-y-restauracion-del-dominio-publico-hidraulico/estrategia-nacional-restauracion-rios/Plan-PIMA-ADAPTA-Molina-de-Segura-y-Alguazas.aspx (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
5. Garcia, Ana. (2020). Murcia Río II dotará al Segura de tres nuevas pasarelas urbanas. Murcia: La Opinion de Murcia. Available at: https://www.laopiniondemurcia.es/murcia/2020/06/30/murcia-rio-ii-dotara-segura/1125145.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
6. L.O. (2020) Así Será Murcia Río II. La Opinión de Murcia. Murcia: La Opinión de Murcia. Available at : https://www.laopiniondemurcia.es/murcia/2020/06/29/sera-murcia-rio-ii/1124990.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
7. E.P. (2018). Así será el proyecto de Murcia Río. Murcia: La Opinión de Murcia. 10th of may. Available at : https://www.laopiniondemurcia.es/murcia/2018/10/05/sera-proyecto-murcia-rio/960584.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
8. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. (2020) Fondos europeos en la CH Segura [European funding in the CHSegura]. Murcia: La Opinión de Murcia. Available at: https://www.chsegura.es/chs/cuenca/federchsegura/fondos.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
9. European Commission. (2020). European Funding for Regional Development. Belgium: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/es/funding/erdf/ (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
10. L.O. (2019), Ecologistas en Acción critica el proyecto “Murcia Río” porque parece un parque urbano. Murcia: La Opinión de Murcia. 14th of June. Available at: https://www.laopiniondemurcia.es/murcia/2019/06/14/ecologistas-accion-critica-proyecto-murcia/1030452.html (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Bike lane in Murcia River
Bike lane in Murcia River
Source: Ref. 10