1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Porto
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Projeto das 100.000 árvores na Área Metropolitana do Porto
Short description of the intervention
The FUTURE - a project of 100,000 trees in the Porto Metropolitan Area - is a planned and coordinated effort of various organizations and citizens to create and maintain native urban forests in this region, which needs to enrich its biodiversity, sequester carbon, improve quality of air, protect their soil and contribute to a better quality of life for regional people. The 100,000 Trees Project for the Porto Metropolitan Area” intends to restore 100 hectares of urban forest with native trees. (1, 2)
Address

Porto
Portugal

Total area
1000000.00m²
NBS area
1000000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2010
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2011
End date of the intervention
2018
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
1. Create and manage a flagship project to reforest the region with native species;
2. Help manage urban forests with the goal of making a difference in the territory;
3. Create training and action opportunities for citizens with the goal of having a positive impact on people’s awareness and practical knowledge about trees and woodlands;
4. Structure a volunteer program for reforestation and management tasks with a goal of contributing to social change and promoting public participation.
5. Also, urban forests filter air, water and sunlight, moderate harsh local climates, cooling the air and slowing wind and
stormwater runoff, reduce the urban heat island effect and air pollution, act as carbon sink against climate change, provide recreational opportunities, improve wildlife habitat and biodiversity and create other countless health, social and economic benefits (2)
Quantitative targets
1. The creation of 100 hectares of native woodlands in the region (100.000 trees) until 2015, mainly in areas that were previously subject to human pressures such as fire or invasive species (2)
2. Plant native trees, like pendulucate oak and sweet chestnut. About 80% of the trees are supplied through the Common Forest Program.(Floresta Comum) (1)
3. Assuring the trees are well cared for after being planted, with an average survival rate of 70%. (3)
4. It is expected that biodiversity, the soil's biocapacity and water regulation improve and that about 125 tons of carbon dioxide are stored per hectare planted per year (annual average for a 40 year period). (2)
Monitoring indicators defined
1. Number of trees planted
2. Size of area that needs reforestation
3. Survival rate considerations (2,3)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Climate change mitigation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change mitigation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
By June 2011, after several meeting rounds, the project was able to bring together the basic resources needed for the startup phase: (1) eight planting areas (public and private; in mountain, urban, and riverside areas) totaling around 40 hectares, (2) human resources for planting and management (these forest management teams resulted from the cooperation between landowners associations, the central government and municipalities), (3) indigenous tree seedlings (from state nurseries, through a partnership with a non-governmental organization), and (4) a growing goodwill movement to help with the planting and management (NGO, schools, companies and organizations with social responsibility departments). The main implementation phase of the 100.000 trees project started in September (training) and October 2011 (planting) (2)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Green corridors and green belts
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
by 2018, 106.019 native trees planted (6)
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Air quality regulation
Carbon storage/sequestration
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Researchers, university
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The FUTURO is an initiative of CRE.Porto (Regional Center for Excellence in Education for the Sustainable Development of the Porto Metropolitan Area), coordinated by the Porto Metropolitan Area and the Portuguese Catholic University (Porto). Several public and private entities actively participate in the FUTURE, offering institutional support and material and human resources to the project. There are two main panels working within RCE Porto. The first is a forum for representation of local and regional stakeholders and its main functions are to help outline joint actions and to make a contribution to their implementation. The second key panel is the Coordinating Office which is the engine of RCE Porto. It is committed to making things happen, to prompt collaboration, to managing joint projects, to identifying and preparing funding applications, and to organising meetings between partners. (1, 2)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Researchers/university
Citizens or community group
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
This NBS mentions the connection with The Strategic Environmental Plan of the Metropolitan Area of ​​Porto that points out the need to promote the forest. (Plano Estratégico de Ambiente da Área Metropolitana do Porto (2003-2008).(1)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
This NBS mentions the connection with The Strategic Environmental Plan of the Metropolitan Area of ​​Porto that points out the need to promote the forest. (Plano Estratégico de Ambiente da Área Metropolitana do Porto (2003-2008).(1)
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
This NBS was implemented across a network of cities of Portugal: Arouca, Gondomar, Maia, Matosinhos, Oliveira de Azeméis, Porto, Póvoa de Varzim, S. João da Madeira, Santo Tirso, Trofa, Vale de Cambra, Valongo, Vila do Conde. It also mentions its connection to the International Forest Day (4)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Until 2018, the project attracted 400,000 EUR spent for the implementation (6)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of innovation
Please specify technological innovation
This NBS is a process innovation since for its implementation it was needed not only the support of the population but it meant engaging people in understanding environmental procedures, training them, voicing their opinions and lastly supporting their needs (1)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
For Portugal this is a new intervention and it came as a result of fires diminishing the forests of Portugal (1)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The 100.000 trees project is being replicated elsewhere in the country from 2012. The Common Forest Project (a nationwide project promoted by a non-governmental organization and the government office for nature protection and forests) was launched in March 2012 and its guidelines and procedures reflect the lessons learned over the development of this project. (2)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
In 2018 the project issued a report called; "8 years and 100 native trees after". In the report the following impacts were described:
-an increase of access to green areas by creating 174 ha of green space and including 85% of that space in the protected territory;
-9,877 tones of carbon sequestered/year;
-55 tons of atmospheric pollutants removed from the atmosphere per year which increased air quality;
-0.67 tons of PM2.5 removed from the atmosphere which decreased air pollution;
The report also insisted on the biodiversity aspect and restoration of native trees, concluding that 74.774 of the trees planted were natives but also were produced in a tree nursery. The report emphasized the actions taken within the project increased the conservation of the ecosystem. (6). More exhaustive data can be found in the report attached.
Description of economic benefits
In 2018 the project issued a report called; "8 years and 100 native trees after". In the report it was specified that the NBS impacted positively the tourism of the area, making it more sustainable, with 49 touristic areas being transformed and prepared for a more enduring and viable economy (6).
Another important aspect is that the NBS generated 3.400.570 €/year in economic benefits (5)
Description of social and cultural benefits
In 2018 the project issued a report called "8 years and 100 native trees after". In the report is mentioned that the project itself was a national and international success, helping with the education of the locals about the local nature, involving over 14.481 parents, children and professors. In this way, it was reported an increase in social interaction, and access to a new green space. The NBS also gained 4 national and international prizes promoting natural heritage and emphasizing its importance. In 2017, the project won the national award “O Norte Somos Nós”, in the Sustainability category, promoted by the Northern Regional Coordination and Development Commission (CCDR), together with Jornal de Notícias. (6)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Number of trees planted;
Tones of carbon sequestered;
Number of people participating;
Indicators for air quality;
Number of companies participating in the NBS (6).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Since the project relies heavily on volunteers because of the 2020 pandemic, planting of trees or any other events have been cancelled. On the 13th of June, after 3 months of absence, the project resumed work. On the 4th of July, a new action of maintenance took place (1)
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Before the field trips, the GPS coordinates of the samples were collected, using the QGis platform. The GPS coordinates of the samples were validated on the ground to be introduced in the geographical information (GIS). Each parcel of planting and each sample was assigned a code, which allows them to be identified in the GIS. Also in terms of assessment tools, it was used the Taxa de sobrevivência (survival rate of the trees planted) (5)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
Yes
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
Short presentation of the project (120.69 KB) 120.69 KB
List of references
1. 100milarvores (no date), Futuro, o projecto das 100,000 arvores,(website of the intervention), Available at http://www.100milarvores.pt/projeto/apresentacao (Accessed 22-6-2020)

2. United Nations Climate Change (no date), The 100,000 Trees Project - Portugal, Available at http://unfccc.int/secretariat/momentum_for_change/items/8299txt.php (Accessed 22-6-2020)

3. Pinto, M. et al (2016), Urban Forest Governance: FUTURE—The 100,000 Trees Project in the Porto Metropolitan Area, Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303561346_Urban_Forest_Governance_FUTURE-The_100000_Trees_Project_in_the_Porto_Metropolitan_Area (Accessed 22-6-2020)

4. Grupo de Estudos Ambientais | Universidade Católica Portuguesa (2016), Balanço 2011-2016, Available at http://www.100milarvores.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FUTURO_balan%C3%A7o-global-2011-a-2016_5ago2016.pdf (Accessed 22-6-2020)

5. Grupo de Estudos Ambientais | Universidade Católica Portuguesa (2016), Monitoring results, Monitorização , Available at https://docplayer.com.br/85520820-Relatorio-monitorizacao-das-parcelas-grupo-de-estudos-ambientais-universidade-catolica-portuguesa.html (Accessed 22-6-2020)

6.Projeto 100 mil arvores (2018), 8 years and 100,000 native trees after, Available at http://www.100milarvores.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Relat%C3%B3rio_Vers%C3%A3o_Digital_final.pdf, (Accessed 31-7-2020)
Additional comments
Both the monitoring reports as the final reports are important documents but I wasn't able to upload them, because they were too big. Nevertheless, they contain a lot of useful and precise data.
Comments and notes
Additional insights
1. The FUTURE - project of the 100,000 trees in the Metropolitan Area of ​​Porto received the Yves Rocher Foundation's ' Terre de Femmes' Prize (2013) and was awarded the 'Excellence Project' by the United Nations University (2014) in the category of 'Training And Community Involvement through Education-Action ', and their value in improving and expanding native urban forests has been recognized.
The FUTURE - project of the 100,000 trees in the Porto Metropolitan Area is still a case study in the book "Traditional Knowledge and Biodiversity" edited by the United Nations University (2013). (1)
2. Between 2001 and 2010, an average of 4,800 hectares of forest area were burned per year (equivalent to 138 times the area of ​​the Biological Park of Gaia!). Fires cause serious ecological and material damage and preventing them is a priority. It is scientifically demonstrated that monoculture forests are more susceptible to fires than mixed forests. Therefore, creating areas of native forest diversifies the forest mass and hinders the spread of fire. (1)
Public Images
Image
Tree Planting for the Project (2015)
Tree Planting for the Project (2015)
CRE.Porto, retrieved 08/29/2018 from Marta Pinto
Image
Tree Planting for the Project (2015)
Tree Planting for the Project (2015)
CRE.Porto, retrieved 08/29/2018 from Marta Pinto