1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Sofia
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Новият парк "Възраждане"
Short description of the intervention
The first new park in Sofia since 30 years was created, which had very positive reviews from the citizens of the capital. The park features attractive grey infrastructure, grass lawns, and more than 600 planted trees. It has become a popular place for recreation. The aims of the project were to improve the public environment so that it is more suitable for rest; create conditions for sport and recreation in an urban park environment; and to thereby improve the economical state of the region by attracting investments and new employment opportunities. (Ref. 1; Ref. 2; Ref. 3). Extension of a 6.6 acre water park and additional 18.2 acre green area was also completed in 2020 (Ref 8 and 9).
Address

Park Vuzrajdane
1303 Sofia
Bulgaria

Area boundary
POINT (23.305352 42.696677)
POINT (23.308903 42.696172)
POINT (23.308736 42.694422)
POINT (23.305088 42.693069)
POINT (23.304423 42.693889)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Park+„Vazrazhdane“/@42.6948,23.3047192,638m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x4a4ad0dfbcfc2393!8m2!3d42.6949262!4d23.3066933
Total area
210437.00m²
NBS area
29399.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Contested land. Could be either privately owned or owned by the municipality. There was a case in progress as of April 2016. (Ref 7)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2015
End date of the intervention
2020
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
- Restore a degraded urban area
- Improve the public environment so that it is more suitable for rest;
- Create conditions for sport and recreation in an urban park environment
- Improve the economical state of the region by attracting investments and new employment opportunities
- Help make Sofia a green city
(Ref. 1; Ref. 3; Ref. 4)
Quantitative targets
Create an additional 24 decares of green areas in the second phase of the park's construction (yet to be carried out) (Ref. 1)
Monitoring indicators defined
decares of green areas in the second phase of the park's construction (yet to be carried out) (Ref. 1)
Implementation activities
- 29 399 sq.m. of green area have been created.
- 607 new trees, 1258 shrubs, and 649 flowers have been planted.
- Grass areas were created, including ones specially suited for children playing, picnic, and adding a circus
- A number of grey infrastructural and recreational elements were added, including an amphitheater, alleys, circus facilities, children's playgrounds, sports grounds, a fountain, irrigation system, and others
- Improve the economical state of the region by attracting investments and new employment opportunities
(Ref. 1, 3. , 4.)
Type of NBS project
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Blue infrastructure
Other
Please specify "other blue area"
water park (Ref 8 and 9)
Please specify "other derelict areas"
Degraded urban land
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
600 in first phase and 400 in extension (Ref 1, 9)
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
- A number of grey infrastructural and recreational elements were added, including an amphitheater, alleys, circus facilities, children's playgrounds, sports grounds, a fountain, irrigation system, and others (Ref. 1, 3. , 4.)"
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The agency Sofiiski Imoti, which is funded by the Municipality of Sofia, provided funding for the project and designed the project plan. The construction was carried out by the municipal agency Sofproect and the firms Kalistratov Group Ltd., SK-13 Putstroy, and Peep Brothers Ltd.. The amphitheater was designed by the firm X2 Studio. The park was also co-funded by the EU through the fund JESSICA. (Ref. 1; Ref. 4).
Key actors - initiating organization
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
EU body
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Land owners
Please specify other land owner
Contested land. Could be either privately owned or owned by the municipality. The municipality initiated the organisation of the project but it was contested by private landowners. There was a case in progress as of April 2016. (Ref 7)
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Please specify other landowner
Contested land. Could be either privately owned or owned by the municipality. The municipality initiated the organisation of the project but it was contested by private landowners. There was a case in progress as of April 2016. (Ref 7)
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The project was financed through the European Union's JESSICA funding instrument. The instrument is governed by several legislative provisions, available on http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/special-support-instruments/jessica/legislation/#1
(Ref. 1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The park is mentioned briefly in the Master Plan of Sofia Municipality, in the context of the measures for development of sustainable tourism through adequate use of the natural and cultural assets of Sofia Municipality. One of the measures listed is utilizing the available mineral water resources in the design of park Vozrazhdane.
(Ref. 6)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The park is mentioned briefly in the Master Plan of Sofia Municipality, in the context of the measures for development of sustainable tourism through adequate use of the natural and cultural assets of Sofia Municipality. One of the measures listed is utilizing the available mineral water resources in the design of park Vozrazhdane. (Ref. 6)
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
water park, green area (Ref 8 and 9)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The mayor of Sofia, Yordanka Fandukova, said that the project is an example of a successful collaboration between the Municipality and Sofiiski Imoti (an agency funded by the Municipality) (Ref. 7).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project was funded by the Municipality and by the EU through the financial instrument JESSICA (Ref. 1).
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Please specify other co-financing type
The project was funded by the Municipality and by the EU through the financial instrument JESSICA (Ref. 1).
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
3 069 500 euros (Ref. 2)
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
3 069 500 euros (Ref. 2)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Please specify other Business model
Improve the economical state of the region by attracting investments and new employment opportunities (Ref. 1; Ref. 3; Ref. 4)
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The infrastructure of the area was renovated and improved significantly. New meadows were created, the greenery was enriched with trees, shrubs, and flowers; new grey infrastructure was added, including alleys, decorative elements, playgrounds, lighting, an amphitheater, an irrigation system, and more. This resulted in a completely new environment which is more aesthetically appealing, cleaner, and much more suitable for recreation and rest.
(Ref. 1)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The mayor of Sofia said that plans to build a park on the area had existed since 40 years ago. Also, Sofiiski Imoti mention that in the previous master plans of the municipality, there have been plans to build a park in the area. However, both sources have not given further details as to whether the project is copied from a previous plan (Ref. 2; Ref. 7).
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project restored a degraded urban area and planted around 1000 trees. (Ref. 1; Ref. 3; Ref. 4, Ref. 8)
Please specify other socio-cultural impact
gov cooperation: The mayor of Sofia, Yordanka Fandukova, said that the project is an example of a successful collaboration between the Municipality and Sofiiski Imoti (an agency funded by the Municipality) (Ref. 7).
Description of economic benefits
8 new jobs were created (Ref. 3)
Description of social and cultural benefits
The park is used by any people for sports and leisure activities and has received many positive reviews and a high rating (4.4 out of 5) from visitors on Google Maps, based on 203 voters (Ref. 5).
- There have been 7 events held in the park (Ref. 3)
- The park has received many positive reviews and a high rating (4.4 out of 5) from visitors on Google Maps, based on 203 voters (Ref. 5).
gov cooperation: The mayor of Sofia, Yordanka Fandukova, said that the project is an example of a successful collaboration between the Municipality and Sofiiski Imoti (an agency funded by the Municipality) (Ref. 7).

Type of reported impacts
Indicators
- The park has received many positive reviews and a high rating (4.4 out of 5) from visitors on Google Maps, based on 203 voters (Ref. 5).
- 8 new jobs were created (Ref. 3)
- There have been 7 events held in the park (Ref. 3)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
Contested land. Could be either privately owned or owned by the municipality. The municipality initiated the organisation of the project but it was contested by private landowners. There was a case in progress as of April 2016. (Ref 7)
COVID-19 pandemic
No mention found of the park, but the newly opened water park is accepting visitors. The venue’s management has, of course, announced that they will be adhering to and enforcing all the mandated and necessary epidemiological and hygienic measures as mandated by the relevant authorities, including the regular disinfection of the water park’s grounds. (Ref 8 - accessed on 8 September 2020)
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
User reviews and rating of the park on Google Maps (Ref. 5).
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
Ref. 1. Градът (2016). Парк "Възраждане". Новият парк на София. [online] available at: https://issuu.com/tcmgbg/docs/infra_br5_175dpi/37?e=19480525/40220214 [Accessed on 3 September 2020].
Ref. 2. Найденова, В. (2016). Парк "Възраждане" – новият парк на София. [online] available at: http://gradat.bg/show.php?storyid=2857992&rubrname=news [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 3. Фонд за устойчиво градско развитие (2017). Парк „Възраждане”, гр. София, район „Възраждане”, м. „Зона Б-5-4”, кв. 1a, УПИ I и УПИ III“ – I етап на „Софийски имоти” ЕАД. [online] available at: http://www.jessicasofia.com/?act=proekti&prid=10 [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 4. Софийски Имоти (2013). Проект „Парк Възраждане”. [online] available at: http://www.sofimoti.bg/%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8/ [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 5. Google (2017). Park "Vazrazhdane". All reviews. [online] available at: https://www.google.nl/maps/place/Park+%E2%80%9EVazrazhdane%E2%80%9C/@42.6949808,23.3056407,300m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m15!1m7!3m6!1s0x40aa854082667b37:0x8436de29bdbf235!2sPark+Vuzrajdane,+1303+Sofia,+Bulgaria!3b1!8m2!3d42.6951427!4d23.3071936!3m6!1s0x0:0x4a4ad0dfbcfc2393!8m2!3d42.6949259!4d23.3066931!9m1!1b1?hl=en [Updated in 2020. [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 6. Sofproect (2014). ОБЩИНСКИ ПЛАН ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА СТОЛИЧНА ОБЩИНА ЗА ПЕРИОДА 2014 - 2020 г. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 7. "МИТ Прес" ООД (2016). София има нов парк - „Възраждане“. [online] available at: http://www.manager.bg/%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE/%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0-%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA-%E2%80%9E%D0%B2%D1%8A%D0%B7%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%E2%80%9C [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 8. The Mayor (2020) Sofia’s outdoor water park "Vazrazhdane" opens its doors. Source:https://www.themayor.eu/en/sofias-outdoor-water-park-vazrazhdane-opens-its-doors [Accessed on 3 September 2020]
Ref. 9. Sofia municipality (2018). Fandakova: We expand "Vazrazhdane" Park by another 25 decare. Source: https://www.sofia.bg/web/sofia-municipality/start/-/asset_publisher/HMYVGw6PDFKh/content/fandakova-we-expand-vazrazhdane-park-by-another-25-decares-we-will-build-an-aqua-park-and-a-mineral-water-pool?inheritRedirect=false [Accessed on 3 September 2020]

Comments and notes
Comments
2017 comment:
An e-mail was sent to Sofiiski Imoti in order to ask for information about sections 1, 4, and 5.

2020 comment: no information or evidence of this interview is provided in the questionnaire.
Public Images
Image
Plan of the extension
https://www.sofia.bg/web/sofia-municipality/start/-/asset_publisher/HMYVGw6PDFKh/content/fandakova-we-expand-vazrazhdane-park-by-another-25-decares-we-will-build-an-aqua-park-and-a-mineral-water-pool?inheritRedirect=false
Image
Playground
https://24x7.place/en/object-index-297.html