1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Stockholm
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
“The purpose of the C/O City project is to highlight the value of nature in the city, create planning documentation and develop concrete solutions that facilitate work with ecosystem services in urban planning.” The three phases of the project were to develop tools and methods, verify and adjust the tools and make them available to key actors. The final phase was to test the tools/methods and evaluate them. (Note: the starting point of the project was the environmental profiling of the Royal Seaport; i.e. Norra Djurgårdsstaden). Now as the project is completed, the results and lessons are continued by a non-profit association. The purpose of the association is to draw attention to and highlight the value of urban ecosystem services and contribute to increased knowledge in the public construction sector. (Ref. 1, 7, 8)
Address

Östermalm, Norra Djurgårdsstaden
Sweden

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2011
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2015
End date of the intervention
2017
Present stage of the intervention
Please specify "other" stage of the intervention
"The C/O city project started in August 2011 and phase 3 will end in September 2017." As noted above, the starting point of the C/O city project was the environmental profiling of the Royal Seaport (sv. Norra Djurgårdsstaden) which is one of the sub-projects (The biotope area factor/sv. Grönytefaktorn). (Ref. 1, 2)
Goals of the intervention
“The purpose of C/O City is to create tools for assessment, planning and use of ecosystem services in urban development to maximise benefits for society. The project is a response to the challenge “Sustainable, Attractive Cities” within Vinnova’s “Challenge-driven Innovation” programme. The vision was to raise awareness of the potential of ecosystem services to increase the resilience of cities while contributing to world-class sustainable urban development in Sweden. The goals were to make visible and quantify urban ecosystem services, to develop concrete planning and monitoring tools, and to produce data to demonstrate the connections between urban ecosystem services and resilience.” (Ref. 2)

Also, the goal of the sub-project "The Biotope Area Factor (for e.g. Norra Djurgården, Stockholm Royal Seaport, was developed to identify ecosystem services and to encourage the strengthening of local ecosystems and creation of climate-adapted courtyards with high social values." (Ref. 2)
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
The Biotope Area Factor (BAF) is calculated through dividing 'ecologically effective area(m2)' with 'area of the public land'. (Ref. 2)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Implementation activities
Sub-projects such as The biotope Area Factor (BAF) which has been mentioned, has been developed in line with the requirements formulated in the sustainability programme for the Stockholm Royal Seaport (sv. Norra Djurgårdsstaden). A cooperative pilot study has been done by Stockholm University, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, and the C/O City project (called Pollination Potential in The Stockholm Royal Seaport) which "illustrate importance of taking into account the placement of city blocks with resources for pollinators."
Furthermore, the intervention has evaluated various solutions for green roofs and walls to see how they influence moisture protection in the building envelope and energy consumption, through e.g. interviews. Also, developed a method for monitoring ecosystem service functions, (inspired by the Cities Biodiversity Index (CBI)). (Ref. 2)

The purpose of the C / O City project is to highlight and make visible the value of nature in the city, create planning documents and develop concrete solutions that make it easier for various societal actors to work with ecosystem services in urban planning. The long-term goal is for ecosystem services to become a natural and integrated part of planning in all community building. The values ​​developed within C / O City will form an important basis for both builders and architects to be able to calculate the benefits and gains from new construction and restoration. The C / O City project has been completed, but the results and lessons are continued by a non-profit association. The purpose of the association is to draw attention to and highlight the value of urban ecosystem services and contribute to increased knowledge in the public construction sector. (Ref 7, 8)
Please specify other type of green wall
Unknown
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Nature on buildings (external)
Green roofs
Green walls or facades
Parks and urban forests
Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
Type of Green Wall
Please specify other type of green roof
Unknown
Type of Green Roof
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Pollination
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Recreation
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Please specify "other primary beneficiary"
It is suggested that the beneficiary is officers/diverse departments in local authorities. The purpose is to highlight the value of the nature in the city (through creating e.g. planning documents and develop concrete solutions that facilitate work with ecosystem services in urban planning). (Ref 1)
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Researchers, university
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
"The project is a constellation of 13 actors from different organizations and industries in environmental and health issues, planning, architecture, construction, technology and research." (Ref 1)
"The city of Stockholm was project owner, with partners e.g. NCC, the city of Malmö, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, White Architects, WSP, U&We, Albaeco, Esam and Ekokultur." (Ref. 2, 1)
"The C / O City project has been completed, but the results and lessons are continued by a non-profit association." (Ref. 7)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Researchers/university
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The project is a response to the challenge “Sustainable, Attractive Cities” within Vinnova’s “Challenge-driven Innovation” programme. (Ref. 2)
The societal challenges which are basis for e.g. the EU's strategy 2020 and European Innovation Union, are also identified by Vinnova (e.g. Vinnova has identified four societal challenges in which Sweden’s prospects for internationally leading innovativeness are considered good. These are: Information society 3.0, Sustainable Attractive Cities, Future Healthcare and Competitive Production.") (Ref. 3)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The sub-project 'The biotope Area Factor (BAF)' has been developed in line with the requirements formulated in the sustainability programme for the Stockholm Royal Seaport (sv. Norra Djurgårdsstaden). (Ref. 2)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The sustainability programme for the Stockholm Royal Seaport. (Ref. 2)
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Project funded by Vinnova.
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
3.4 million
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The total cost of the project (reported in 2015, but to continue to 2017) is estimated to around 3.4 M euro (34 million SEK). (Ref. 4)
Vinnova (Swedish innovation agency) around 1.3 M euro (13 million SEK) and In-kind budget around 2 M euro (20 million SEK). (Ref. 5)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Business models
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
The purpose is to highlight the value of the nature in the city through quantifying urban ecosystem services, developing concrete planning and monitoring tools, producing data to demonstrate connections between urban ecosystem services and resilience. (Ref. 2)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The innovation is copied/derived from previous initiative(s) with substantial adaptation, Sub-projects (such as BAF for the Stockholm Royal Seaport) are based on previous interventions e.g. The Biotope Area Factor (BAF) which was developed in Berlin, Germany (1990s) and introduced in Sweden in conjunction with Bo01 international housing exhibition in Malmö. (Ref. 2)

Another example is the The City Biodiversity Index (CBI) (originally developed and maintained by Singapore National Parks Department). (Ref. 6)
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
By developing concrete planning and monitoring tools, producing data to demonstrate connections between urban ecosystem services and resilience and including them as a part of/basis for e.g. Masterplans and Detailed Masterplans. (Ref. 2)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The green in the city has several important functions, both benefit-related, aesthetic and health-related for people. The values ​​we develop within C / O City will form an important basis for both builders and architects to be able to calculate the benefits and gains from new construction and restoration, explains Christina Wikberger, City of Stockholm and project manager for C / O City. Via the pilots, we will receive data that shows how many cubic meters of stormwater a park can handle, how much the trees in the city can protect us from heatwaves and help reduce noise and how much value different green areas generate. We will also evaluate different solutions for green roofs and green walls to see how they can increase biodiversity, improve stormwater management, increase human well-being and reduce buildings' energy use. Just like hard data for, for example, energy use in houses, this knowledge is necessary to absorb and use in practice if we are to be able to create sustainable cities, says Jan Wijkmark, White Architects and steering group member in C / O City. (Ref 8)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Social and cultural impacts
Description of social and cultural benefits
Unknown
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of August of 2020
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
Yes
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Not applicable; although references mention "some tools developed that could be used as impact assessment tools" are "modelling tools for connectivity, noise, climate regulation". (See e.g. Ref. 2 and Interview Nr. 1)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
No
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
"No, the project focus on developers and planners." (From Interview Nr. 1)
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
No
Please specify
"No, the project focus on developers and planners." (From Interview Nr. 1)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
Ref. 1. Stockholms Stad (n.d.) C/O City - skapar levande städer. Vi vill skapa nytta i staden. Stockholm Växer. Information obtained: 2017-06-08. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 2. Bokalders, V. & Block, A. (2016) Urban ecosystem services: let the nature do the work - A summary. C/O City. URL: https://www.cocity.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/cocity_urban_ecosystem_services_summary.pdf [Accessed on 20 August 2020]
Ref. 3. Vinnova (2016) Challenge-driven Innoovation. Our activities, Vinnova. Information obtained: 2017-06-08. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 4. Stockholms kommun (2015) Ansökan till utmaningsdriven innovation - steg 3 följdinvestering 2015 (vår). Diarienummer: 2015-00415. Vinnova. Source: https://insynsverige.se/documentHandler.ashx?did=1797651 [Accessed on 20 August 2020]
Ref. 5. Chalmers (2016) C/O City. About the project. Information obtained: 2017-06-08. Source: https://www.chalmers.se/en/projects/Pages/CO-City.aspx [Accessed on 20 August 2020]
Ref. 6. ICLEI (n.d.) City Biodiversity Index (CBI). Information obtained: 2017-06-08. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 7. COCITY (2020) Creating Living Cities. Let nature do the work. URL: https://www.cocity.se/ [Accessed on 20 August 2020]
Ref. 8. Hallbar Stad (2018) C/O City har blivit en medlemsförening! URL: https://www.hallbarstad.se/cocity/c-o-city-har-blivit-en-medlemsforening/ [Accessed on 20 August 2020]
Interview
Attachment Size
Interview Nr 1 (18.49 KB) 18.49 KB
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Future green spaces in cities
C/O City - how future teen spaces will look like
https://www.hallbarstad.se/cocity/c-o-city-har-blivit-en-medlemsforening/
Image
C/O City plans
C/O City Plans
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=https://www.hallbarstad.se/cocity/co-city-skapar-levande-stader/&prev=search&pto=aue
Please specify other source of non-financial contribution
The project is now maintained by a non-profit association Co/City. (Ref 7)