1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Strasbourg
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Le réaménagement de la Place d’Austerlitz
Short description of the intervention
The idea of ​​the project Redevelopment Of Place d'Austerlitz was to create an autonomous ecosystem, including plants and animals, with wild grasses and native trees that attract insects, mammals and birds (Ref. 4). The restructuring involved a whole mixture of paths, fauna, flora and riverside, all within a framework promoting urban ecology and biodiversity (Ref. 5). The project was conceived as "an archipelago of nature in the city" (Ref. 10, 12).
Address

Place d'Austerlitz
67000 Strasbourg
France

Area boundary
POINT (7.7533977573851 48.578296893452)
POINT (7.7527122767962 48.577788361581)
POINT (7.7531302967626 48.577538083608)
POINT (7.7536529133212 48.577588473357)
POINT (7.7544733916332 48.578252124212)
POINT (7.7540132233521 48.578488452401)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Google Earth Pro (September 25, 2020). Coordinates offer a rough approximation of extent of NBS.
Total area
10000.00m²
NBS area
2600.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Former reception area for tourist buses (Ref. 6)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2008
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2012
End date of the intervention
2012
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The use a framework of promoting urban ecology and biodiversity by restructuring a mixture of paths, fauna, flora and riverside features with the project. The ambition of this project is to allow nature to return to the city while allowing users to keep all their habits in a more pleasant and green environment. The project was designed to become a nature archipelago in the city and integrated into its surrounding environent (including a shared garden and a nearby meeting place). (5)
Quantitative targets
10,000 m2 of public space, from facade to facade (Ref. 1)
• 2,600 m2 of plantations (Ref. 1)
• 6,000 bulbs (Ref. 1)
• 46 trees, 13,160 herbaceous plants, 5,810 shrubs (including
a majority of native plants) (Ref. 1)
- 2 000m² green surface (Ref. 10) of total 9,900m² (Ref. 3)

Monitoring indicators defined
Area (m^2) of public space, from facade to facade (Ref. 1)
Area (m^2) of plantations (Ref. 1)
Number of bulbs (Ref. 1)
Number of trees, herbaceous plants, and shrubs (Ref. 1)
Area (m²) green surface (Ref. 10) total area (m²) (Ref. 3)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Please specify "other Type of NBS project"
promoting urban ecology and biodiversity (Ref. 5).
Implementation activities
The decision was taken in 2008 to restructure the site. The strategic objectives of regeneration project derived from the consultation process were to create a new and inclusive central space in the city for the community (e.g. pedestrians, cyclists and motorists). Local associations involved in different orientations worked in connection with the project Master from October 2008 to January 2009 before the City of Strasbourg presented a plans based on inhabitants' remarks; as part of a "jury" locals, developers and officials decided between project ideas based on criteria including Environmental Quality in May 2010, (Ref. 1) picking Digitale Landscape (Ref. 3). The layout, designed by landscaper Agnès Daval and ended in June 2012 (Ref. 14). The site was inaugurated on October 28th 2012 (Ref. 11). "10,000 m2 of public space, from facade to facade
• 2,600 m2 of plantations
• 6,000 bulbs
• 46 trees, 13,160 herbaceous plants, 5,810 shrubs (including
a majority of native plants)
Department of Local Democracy and Proximity
- 2015
The approach was the reverse of most
projects: consultation helped define the
objectives from which the project was developed.
Generally, consultation takes place once
that the objectives have been set" (Ref. 1).
Type of NBS project
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Alley or street trees and other street vegetation
Parks and urban forests
Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
46 (Ref. 1)
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Please specify other local relevant strategy
natural park plan: The project is included as part of the citywide Urban Natural Park plan from Strasbourg Eurometropole to renew the links between nature and the city since 2010 (Ref. 2, 4).
Governance
Non-government actors
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The initiator of the project was Strasbourg Eurometropole. The City of Strasbourg worked closely in consultation with the community's local residents, neighbourhood council and its associations (such as the Association of Inhabitants Bourse-Austerlitz-Krutenau) (Ref. 7) in establishing the objectives of the intervention, as well as its planning, management, monitoring, and playing a key role in judging over the contracted developer (Ref. 1). The entrusted landscape developer of the project was Digitale Landscape (Ref. 8, 10).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Citizens or community group
District/neighbourhood association
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The project is included as part of the citywide Urban Natural Park plan from Strasbourg Eurometropole to renew the links between nature and the city since 2010 (Ref. 2, 4).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project is included as part of the citywide Urban Natural Park plan from Strasbourg Eurometropole to renew the links between nature and the city since 2010 (Ref. 2, 4).
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
6,000 bulbs,13,160 herbaceous plants, 5,810 shrubs (including a majority of native plants) (Ref. 1)
mixture of paths, fauna, flora and riverside, all within a framework promoting urban ecology and biodiversity (Ref. 5)
green surfaces (Ref 3)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
€1 839 464 (Ref. 3)
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
€2,500,000 between Strasbourg Eurometropole (€2,000,000) and the local authority (€500,000) (Ref. 1, 4) or €1,839,464 in total excluding VAT (Ref. 3)
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The project was designed to become a nature archipelago in the city and integrated into its surrounding environment, including the area's shared garden and a nearby meeting place (Ref. 5, 10, 12). The Redevelopment Of Place d'Austerlitz won the French Institute of Roads, Streets and Infrastructures for Mobility contest on "Infrastructure for mobility, biodiversity and landscape" in 2015 (Ref. 1). The Institute aims to respond in a homogeneous way to technical or strategic problems and to change the heritage of infrastructures and public spaces towards sustainable design and better management, as well as greater optimization of their use. These changes are aimed at in order to create a sustainable and suitable habitat for the locale's biodiversity (Ref. 13).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Green space and habitat:
-Increased green space area/Increased number of species present: The project improved the site's green capacity by introducing 2000m² of green surface (Ref. 10) of the site's total of 9,900m² (Ref. 3) which was inhabited by 46 trees, herbaceous 13160, and 5810 shrubs, including a majority of native plants (Ref. 1).
-Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems (local habitats for local species)
-Reduction of biodiversity loss/species present/native seed: "Each circle-garden hosts a range of plants with a large share given to native species. The square weaves a harmonious island of biodiversity in the urban environment" (Ref. 8).
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Safety
-Increased perception of safety: "It is now a network of streets and squares that favors alternative modes of travel, promoting meetings, exchanges and sharing of public spaces in complete safety" (Ref. 6).

Social justice and cohesion:
-Improved access to urban green space: The project improved the site's green capacity by introducing 2000m² of green surface (Ref. 10) of the site's total of 9,900m² (Ref. 3) which was inhabited by 46 trees, herbaceous 13160, and 5810 shrubs, including a majority of native plants (Ref. 1).
-Increased opportunities for social interaction: "It is now a network of streets and squares that favors alternative modes of travel, promoting meetings, exchanges and sharing of public spaces in complete safety" (Ref. 6).
-Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces: The strategic objectives of regeneration project were derived from the consultation process (Ref. 1).

Health and wellbeing:
-Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: create a new and inclusive central space in the city for the community (e.g. pedestrians, cyclists and motorists) (Ref. 1).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
The project improved the site's green capacity by introducing 2000m² of green surface (Ref. 10) of the site's total of 9,900m² (Ref. 3) which was inhabited by 46 trees, herbaceous 13160, and 5810 shrubs, including a majority of native plants (Ref. 1).
Environmental, social and economic impacts
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
After opening Austerlitz, a number of residents (who participated in the jury) volunteered to participate, with muncipaux agents, in a monitoring committee to identify possible improvements, which meets about three times a year (Ref. 1). Feedback from the Association of Inhabitants Bourse-Austerlitz-Krutenau on the project can be found on their website (Ref. 7).
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
There is criticism that the project does not go far enough "While the development of the square has sparked heated debates, most of the players seem to have integrated its green dimension, to the point of finding it insufficient" (Ref. 4). "he benches, arranged in lines, prevent people from discussing between them. They would have liked to make it a place of life, with tables for eating, ping-pong tables, and putting activities there" (Ref. 4).
COVID-19 pandemic
No specific information available as of September 25, 2020. Stay at home orders were active in all of France from March 16, 2020 to May 11, 2020 (https://www.gouvernement.fr/en/coronavirus-covid-19).
Methods of impact monitoring
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Online Forum (4, 10) Consultation (4) From May 2011 to June 2012, public works were carried out. Twice a month, a public meeting was organized site to founir to residents information about the evolution of the site and allow them to ask questions. On 2 June 2012, the new Place d'Austerlitz was opened to the public. (1) Citizens have expressed grievances with certain aspects of the project (e.g. lack of green, metal instead of wooden artifaces). (4)
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Yes
Please specify
After opening Austerlitz, a number of residents (who participated in the jury) volunteered to participate, with muncipaux agents, in a monitoring committee to identify possible improvements, which meets about three times a year (Ref. 1). Feedback from the Association of Inhabitants Bourse-Austerlitz-Krutenau on the project can be found on their website (Ref. 7).
References
List of references
(1) Scheek, Luc. Gigleux, Céline. Loeffler, Elke. and Terrien, Olivier. [no date]. La place d’Austerlitz, une concertation innovante pour un projet symbole de la ville durable. (Document attached).
(2) Strasbourg Metropole. [no date]. UN PARC NATUREL URBAIN POUR STRASBOURG. Available at: http://www.strasbourg.eu/environnement-qualite-de-vie/nature-en-ville/un-parc-naturel-urbain-pour-strasbourg (Website not available in 2020).
(3) Digitale Paysage. (2012). Aménagement de la place d’Austerlitz à Strasbourg. Available at: http://www.digitalepaysage.com/spip.php?page=projet&id_article=71 (Website not available in 2020).
(4) Bross, Alexis. (2013). Ratés et succès d’une dizaine de rénovations de places à Strasbourg. Available at: http://www.rue89strasbourg.com/dizaine-places-renovation-stasbourg-52616 (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(5) Lollier ingeniere. [no date]. Ancienne gare routière des cars de tourisme de Strasbourg, la place d'Austerlitz attendait son réaménagement. Available at: http://www.lollier.com/amenagements-urbains/reamenagement-de-la-place-d-austerlitz/40 (Website not available in 2020).
(6) Ville-Sante. [no date]. STRASBOURG – L’aménagement des places et espaces verts: LA PLACE D’AUSTERLITZ, UN NOUVEAU CŒUR DE QUARTIER. Available at: http://www.villes-sante.com/actions-des-villes/activite-physique-mobilites/strasbourg-lamenagement-des-places-et-espaces-verts/ (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(7) AHBAK. [no date]. Archives pour la catégorie Place d’Austerlitz. Available at: http://www.ahbak.org/category/place-dausterlitz/ (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(8) Thierry Muller. (2012). Place d'Austerlitz, Strasbourg, 2012. Available at: http://www.espace-vert.fr/ref_98_-place-austerlitz-strasbourg.html (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(9) Strasbourg Metropole. [no date]. LES ESPACES PUBLICS EXTÉRIEURS DE LA PRESQU'ÎLE MALRAUX. Available at:http://www.strasbourg.eu/developpement-rayonnement/urbanisme-logement-amenagement/projets-urbains/deux-rives/malraux/espaces-publics-malraux (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(10) PSS. (2010). Strasbourg - Aménagement et gestion des espaces publics. Available at: http://www.pss-archi.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?id=31924 (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(11) Petit patrimoine. [no date]. Le Point de Convergence à Strasbourg (67). Available at: http://www.petit-patrimoine.com/fiche-petit-patrimoine.php?id_pp=67482_86 (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(12) Ministère de l’Écologie. (2015). Archipel de biodiversité, la place (d'Austerlitz Strasbourg) de la nature en ville. Available at: https://www.1000paysages.gouv.fr/archipel-de-biodiversite-la-place-dausterlitz-strasbourg-de-la-nature-en-ville (Website not available in 2020).
(13) IDRRM. [no date]. Un lieu d'échanges et de convergence. Available at: https://www.idrrim.com/connaitre-idrrim/ (Accessed: September 25, 2020).
(14) Communication au Conseil Municipal. (11) [no author]. (2012). Visite n° 1 : MICRO-JARDINS ET FLEURISSEMENT CITOYEN Visites au centre-ville de jardins et d’espaces verts dans lesquels les habitants s’impliquent. (Document attached).
(15) Goetz, Christiane.(2008). StammTisch du 27 novembre 2008: Petit Glacier, 20h/22h30. (Document attached).
Comments and notes
Comments
2020 comment:
Different surface areas are indicated in different sources (Ref. 1, 3, 8, 10).
Public Images
Image
A square with trees and benches
https://www.rue89strasbourg.com/dizaine-places-renovation-stasbourg-52616