1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Venezia
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Parco di San Giuliano di Mestre
Short description of the intervention
San Giuliano Park, inaugurated in May 2004, was designed by Arch. Antonio Di Mambro of the Comunitas Group. The first two lots have been implemented for a total area of about 74 hectares, including green areas and recreational infrastructure. The creation of this park is one of the biggest re-qualification initiatives in the national territory. With the implementation of the park, the area of Punta San Giuliano, used for years as a landfill of industrial and urban waste, definitively loses its barrier function between Mestre and its lagoon and returns to the natural state of the ancient city (1).
Address

Via Orlanda
30173 Venezia
Italy

Area boundary
POINT (12.279978 45.476024)
POINT (12.281433 45.468158)
POINT (12.270221 45.471847)
POINT (12.266784 45.477845)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Google maps. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/place/San+Giuliano+park/@45.4722889,12.2696864,1838m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x477eb3e3a7e6564d:0xe8dbeb23eb939ec3!8m2!3d45.4732464!4d12.2764257. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
Total area
299467.00m²
NBS area
299467.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
1991
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
1994
End date of the intervention
2004
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
1. Promote a culture of sustainability through public participation in decision-making processes;
2. Preserve and qualify existing landscaping and naturalistic assets;
3. Encourage relationships between subjects (2).
Quantitative targets
A total of 74 acres of land were converted to green space and 210 hectares were covered by new woods (2).
Monitoring indicators defined
Hectares covered by new woods
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
The Guide Plan completed in '94 defined a wide area of intervention, divided into several project areas: Forte Marghera, Canale Salso, Osellino Canal, Passo Campalto, the lagoon front of Campalto, Punta San Giuliano, the island of sculptures and 'Area Pili. Of the park complex set up in the Guide Plan, the City Administration has subsequently set the implementation priorities in relation to political-administrative urgencies, financial availability and ownership of the areas. On Friday 7 November 2003, the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, and the Mayor of Venice, Paolo Costa, presented the San Giuliano Park to the citizens at the North Entrance of the Park. For three days the Park was open to citizens with entertainment activities and initiatives as well as the activation of a train for a circular route. On 8 May 2004, the San Giuliano Park was officially inaugurated with the cutting of the ribbon by the Mayor Paolo Costa together with the Architect Antonio Di Mambro and the President of the Institution Il Parco Giovanni Caprioglio. In 2010, three pergolas, new toilets and two changing rooms were built. (1).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Please specify other local relevant strategy
Protection and Promotion of Green Areas (3 and 4).
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
In 1991, arch. Antonio Di Mambro, head of the Comunitas Inc. group, winner of the international urban design competition, has been commissioned to design the "Leisure System in the area of San Giuliano Forte Marghera and Cavergnaghi" whose first stage consisted of In the drafting of the Guide Plan (1).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
I could see the rebonification of the area was part of the Municipal Plan for the Management of Green Areas in the city and the Municipal Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Green Areas (4) presented to obtain EU funding (1 and 3).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The city of Venice included this NBS in the context of a larger Municipal Plan for the Management of Green Areas in the city and the Municipal Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Green Areas (3 and 4).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project has received funding both from the local government and the EU (5).
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown. The project has received funding both from the local government and the EU (5).

Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The construction of the Parco di San Giuliano is one of the most ambitious projects among those included among the Italian proposals allowed for European contribution. Certainly Venice is one of the most significant urban reconstruction projects for consistency, complexity and articulation, as well as the difficulties of implementation due to the strong environmental degradation of the site. The proposal for environmental remediation and restoration of marine ecology - a complex yet delicate and rapidly advancing sector - represents the beginning of a policy of conservation of the lagoon habitat, which can reverse the processes of degradation of existing natural resources on the lagoon edge (1 and 2).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The realisation of this park is one of the biggest re-qualification initiatives in the national territory. (1)
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown.
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
1. San Giuliano The park is now one of the richest areas of biodiversity of the lagoon Venetian environment and is known to be an excellent area to observe the animal species attending the lagoon.
2. The area was previously a waste dumping site and later converted to a public space. This not only increased green spaces within the city but also improved the quality of the green space by introducing new species to the area. (1 and 6)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
1. The particular position in which the Park is located, on the shores of the lagoon, halfway between the poles of Venice and Mestre, gives it an important symbolic role, which is expressed in the dual function of the gateway to the lagoon city and centre of gravity of the flows of social and cultural interest.
2. Every year on the first weekend of June the "Festa del Vento" takes place, an international kite gathering that every year boasts an ever-increasing number of participants, guests and spectators, with shows, entertainment and performances. In addition, it hosted the Venice Marathon course, Electrovenice Festival, Mass celebrated by Pope Benedict XVI, Venice International Boat Show and other events.
3. The park attracts the interest of many wildlife photographers and observers, especially ornithologists. (1 and 6)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown.
Environmental, social and economic impacts
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of September, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown.
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
1. Forest and the Large Park Institution (no date) The Project. Instituzione Bosco e Grandi Parchi. Available at: http://www.enti.comune.venezia.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/349. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
2. ISPRA (no date) Municipal regulation for the protection and promotion of greenery in the city - VENICE. Available at: http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/gelso/banca-dati/comune/comune-di-venezia/regolamento-comunale-di-tutela-e-promozione-del-verde-in-citta-venezia. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
3. Municipal Plan for Management of Green Areas in the City: attached
4. Municipal Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Green Areas: attached
5. Project Costs: http://www.insula.it/images/pdf/resource/quadernipdf/Q08-07.pdf [not accessible due to privacy issues as of September, 2020]
6. San Giuliano Park Wikipedia page. Available at: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parco_San_Giuliano. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
Interview comments
I am waiting for a response from the office responsible for the project. I will contact them by phone since they are not replying to my email.
Comments and notes
Comments
I could not access the reports. I found a link to a website called Ombrello.org where it stated that all the documentation was there, but the document seems to not exist.

I called the Municipality of Venice and they gave me this contact: Roberto Buzzo 00390412516721. He did not pick up my calls.
Public Images
Image
St. Julian of Mestre Park (2010)
St. Julian of Mestre Park (2010)
Alessio Boato, retrieved 08/13/2018
Image
St. Julian of Mestre Park (2010)
St. Julian of Mestre Park (2010)
Alessio Boato, retrieved 08/13/2018