1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Århus
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Proposed New Waste Water Plan - protection of water flow all year round in Giber River (Spildevandsplan 2013-2016 - Sikring af vandføring hele året i Giber Å)
Short description of the intervention
A significant expansion of the summer water level in the biggest local natural river, Giber River, was carried out in Aarhus. The increase in water flow in Giber River was achieved by a range of different measures, such as pumping purified wastewater into the river and building a string of rainwater collection ponds that will be allowed to slowly drain into the river. (Ref. 1)
Address

Giber Å
Århus
Denmark

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Giber River (Ref 1)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2013
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2013
End date of the intervention
2020
Present stage of the intervention
Please specify "other" stage of the intervention
The waste water plan for 2013-2016 was adopted in 2013, and from 2017-2020 a new municipal waste water plan is in place. (Ref. 2, 3)
Screened sewage pipes were laid to the Viby plant and back to Giber Å in 2014. The next step in 2015 was to decommission the Tranbjerg plant and pump purified waste water back into Giber Å. (Ref. 4)
Goals of the intervention
"A cohesive approach combines rationalisation of sewage plants with richer fauna in the biggest natural river in Aarhus."
"The project will be a bonus for the environment, through rationalisation bringing major savings in running costs, because the increase in minimum water flow will improve the water quality in the river, creating better conditions for more fish to the benefit of anglers and the balance of nature. The river will also be ensured water volume and quality which will fulfil local environmental objectives and the expected high environmental objective for Giber River in the national water plan." (Ref. 1)
Quantitative targets
The minimum amount of water in Giber River should be increased from the current 45 litres per second, to over 100 litres. (Ref. 1)
Monitoring indicators defined
minimum amount of water in the Giber River in liters per second (Ref 1)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The increase in water flow in Giber River will be achieved by a range of different measures, such as pumping purified waste water into the river and building a string of rainwater collection ponds which will be allowed to slowly drain into the river. (Ref. 1) A measuring station at the top of the river measures when flow drops below 100 litres per second. If it does, water will be added from natural groundwater tributaries, stored rainwater and purified waste water from the return pump. (Ref. 4)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Lakes/ponds
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Recreation
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Please specify "other primary beneficiary"
anglers (Ref 1) ; fish (Ref 1)
Please specify other local relevant strategy
Water Water Plan (Ref 1,5)
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
A proposal made by the City Council for the Waste Water Plan 2013-2016 (for a significant expansion of the summer water level in the biggest local natural river, Giber River). (Ref. 1)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Citizens or community group
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
The Giber river will be ensured water volume and quality which will fulfil the expected high environmental objective for Giber River in the national water plan. (Ref. 1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The river will be ensured water volume and quality which will fulfil local environmental objectives, regulations are also part of the Waste Water Plan 2013-2016, of Aarhus City. (Ref. 1)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The Waste Water Plan 2013-2016 of the City of Aarhus (Ref. 1) and the Giber river is also mentioned in the Waste Water Plan for 2017-2020 (follows regulations from previous plan). (Ref. 5)
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
river; fauna in the biggest natural river in Aarhus.
(Ref. 1)
rainwater collection ponds (Ref 4)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown; however Resources for the project came from savings gained from the centralisation of the city's sewage works, which will involve closing down five small satellite works to the south of the city. (Ref. 1)
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown
Source(s) of funding
Please specify other source of funding
Resources for the project came from savings gained from the centralisation of the city's sewage works, which will involve closing down five small satellite works to the south of the city. (Ref. 1)
Type of fund(s) used
Please specify other type of fund used
Resources for the project came from savings gained from the centralisation of the city's sewage works, which will involve closing down five small satellite works to the south of the city. (Ref. 1)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The increase in water flow in Giber River will be achieved by a range of different measures, such as pumping purified waste water into the river and building a string of rainwater collection ponds which will be allowed to slowly drain into the river. (Ref. 1)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Former regulations for the Giber Å are included in the 2010-2012 waste water plan of the city of Aarhus. (Ref. 6)
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The municipal waste water plan for 2017-2020, also includes regulations for Giber Å. (Ref. 5)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The increase in water flow in Giber River will be achieved by a range of different measures, such as pumping purified waste water into the river and building a string of rainwater collection ponds which will be allowed to slowly drain into the river. (Ref. 1) A measuring station at the top of the river measures when flow drops below 100 litres per second. If it does, water will be added from natural groundwater tributaries, stored rainwater and purified waste water from the return pump. (Ref. 4)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Social and cultural impacts
Please specify other environmental justice issue
better conditions for more fish to the benefit of anglers and the balance of nature. (Ref 1)
Description of social and cultural benefits
Unknown
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
A measuring station at the top of the river measures when flow drops below 100 litres per second. If it does, water will be added from natural groundwater tributaries, stored rainwater and purified waste water from the return pump. (Ref. 4)
Environmental, social and economic impacts
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of 14 September 2020
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
The environmental assessment of the Waste water plan 2013-2016. (Ref. 7)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
Ref. 1. City of Aarhus (2016) Rationalisation and environmental bonuses. Projects. Information obtained: 2017-06-23. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 2. City of Aarhus (2016) Effektivisering giver mere vand til Giber Å. Information obtained: 2017-06-23. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 3. City of Aarhus (2017) Spildevandsplan 2017-2020. Information obtained: 2017-06-23. Source: https://www.aarhus.dk/media/19369/spildevandsplan-2017-2020.pdf [Accessed 14 September 2020]
Ref. 4. City of Aarhus (2016) Rationalisation and environmental bonuses. Targets. Information obtained: 2017-06-23. [Website not available in 2020]
Ref. 5. Aarhus Kommune (2017) Spildevandsplan 2017-2020. Teknik og miljø. Source: https://www.aarhus.dk/demokrati/politikker-og-planer/klima-energi-forsyning-og-affald/spildevandsplan-2017-2020/ [Accessed 18 September 2020]
Ref. 6. Aarhus Kommune (2010) Spildevandsplan 2010-2012. Miljøvurdering. Source: https://www.yumpu.com/no/document/view/33825361/spildevandsplan-2010-2012-dokumentation-aarhus-vand [Accessed 18 September 2020]
Ref. 7. Aarhus Kommune (2012) Spildevandsplan 2013-2016. Miljøvurdering. Teknik og miljø. Source: https://docplayer.dk/6303035-Spildevandsplan-2013-2016.html [Accessed 18 September 2020]
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Giber Å (Ref. 1)
Giber Å (Ref. 1)