1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Coxbazar
Region
Asia
Native title of the NBS intervention
রোহিঙ্গা শরণার্থী শিবিরে পরিবেশগত পুনরুদ্ধার
Short description of the intervention
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and its partners collaborated in 2018 to develop an ecosystem restoration project in the Rohingya Camps of Ukhiya, near Cox's Bazar. The main objective of this project was to mitigate the increased risk of landslides, slope instability, and flooding caused by flash floods and the vicinity of the Bakkhali River. The intervention included the planting of quickly growing native trees, shrubs, and grass species. Additionally, the project encompassed other measures such as vegetable cultivation on stream beds, biological soil stabilization methods, and plant-based wastewater treatments. To ensure the sustainability of the project, a network of future practitioners from the Bangladeshi and Rohingya communities was created. Moreover, environmental education and awareness activities were undertaken to complement the efforts of the project, with a particular focus on engaging young people from both the host and refugee communities to maximize its impact. The area where the project was implemented has been significantly affected by land and forest degradation over the last few decades, which has been exacerbated since the arrival of Rohingya refugees in 2017. Therefore, the project also involved other stakeholders such as the International Center for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Danish Refugee Council, the World Food Programme, the International Organization for Migration, and the Bangladesh government, each contributing in various capacities to achieve the project's objectives. (1,2,3,4)
Address

Coxbazar - 4700
Bangladesh

Total area
6000000.00m²
NBS area
6000000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2018
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2019
End date of the intervention
2021
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The intervention was designed to achieve the following goals:
1. To build wider social-ecological resilience by fostering an environment that will enable strong refugee protection. (1)
2. To meet local challenges within the SDG framework through equal prioritisation of ecosystem preservation and human well-being. (1)
3. To implement several environmental restoration activities that address challenges related to flooding and water management. These interventions include stream restoration, riparian afforestation/reforestation, wastewater treatment, water reservoirs, conservation agriculture, silt trap piloting, stream bank protection, construction of walkways, environmental awareness-raising and education. (1)
4. To provide practical solutions to better utilise space in crowded settlements while enabling refugees to produce vegetables, support their own livelihoods and supply a nutritious diet. (3)
5. To mitigate environmental degradation in displacement settings as well as help displaced and host communities prepare and adapt to the foreseeable effects of climate change. (3)
Quantitative targets
1. To plant 144,000 tree seedlings
2. To plant a total of 76 species
3. To provide training to 3,000 Bangladeshis and Rohingya refugees
4. To plant 500 bamboo seedlings
5. To provide benefits to approx. 30,000 people from the intervention
6. To include 11 refugee camps (1, 2)
Monitoring indicators defined
1. Number of saplings planted
2. Number of refugees trained
3. Number of bamboo seedlings planted
4. Number of species selected
5. Number of people benefiting from the action (1,2)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
Prior to implementing the intervention, the Centre for Natural Resource Studies (CNRS) and UNHCR conducted a rapid assessment through a field assessment and participatory problem appraisal. The findings from this assessment informed the development of a set of nature-based interventions aimed at restoring the Madhur Chhara watershed. In 2019, UNHCR and CNRS implemented a pilot restoration project which focused on four streams of action: (i) water security/stream restoration, (ii) water pollution management, (iii) stream-bank stabilisation, and (iv) planting/regreening denuded camp areas. To achieve these actions, the project required the support of the refugee community and a skilled team with adequate knowledge of ecological restoration, ecosystem and watershed management, including renowned hydrologists and specialist consultants from both private agencies and line departments of the Government of Bangladesh. A silt trap was established in one of the camps in order to trap sand and silt in situ within a specific part of the stream channel, which enabled periodic extractions of sand/silt for productive purposes such as construction material. Technical assistance was provided by the Environmental Science Department of the University of Chittagong. The project also piloted a bacteria-based wastewater treatment plant in another camp, which was found to effectively remove pollutants from Lambasia Chhara. Afterwards, the project started planting Vetivers (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and various other local grasses such as bhadails (Cyperus rotundus), and broom grass (Thysanolaena latifolia) on banks and slopes, supported by bamboo poles. In 2019, a total of 21,000 tree seedlings were produced from the nursery and in 2020, 288,000 Vetiver saplings were raised and planted. Over the two years, a total of 144,000 tree seedlings were planted on 57.2 hectares of denuded land within the camp. Furthermore, the project provided awareness training to 3,000 refugees and supported 931 households in growing vegetables. An energy and environment technical working group coordinated activities and knowledge sharing across the camps. (1,2)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Community gardens and allotments
Allotments
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Please specify the number of plots or allotment gardens
Unknown
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
144,000 tree seedlings (1)
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The initiative has been proposed by UNHCR (as initiator and funder) and developed by UNHCR and its implementing partner, Centre for Natural Resource Studies (CNRS), which developed a detailed technical plan, adopting NbS approaches to restore the degraded riparian ecosystems. Other stakeholders involved were the International Center for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Danish Refugee Council, World Food Programme, International Organization for Migration, and the Bangladesh government in various capacities. (1, 3)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Regional government
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Multilateral organisation
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
This intervention was not created as a response to an EU Directive however from an international point of view sources mention UNHCR’s Strategic Framework for Climate Action as a strategy it responded to. (1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
Regular consultations with the relevant government departments, including the Forest Department, Department of Environment and Universities, ensured interventions were aligned with existing policies, rules and regulations but they are not developed upon. (1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Co-finance for NBS
No
Co-financing governance arrangements
No
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The total cost incurred from 2019–2021 for the implemented NbS interventions was US$ 441,396, equivalent to 414,448.77 Euro (1)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
This project has been a product innovation as it has introduced nature-based biological soil stabilization techniques. This meant that the intervention strived at maintaining adequate slope terracing, compacting, and planting Vetivers (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and various other local grasses such as bhadails (Cyperus rotundus), and broom grass (Thysanolaena latifolia) on banks and slopes, supported by bamboo poles. The ‘Asian palm tree’ was also planted as it can replace mechanical and chemical-based lightning arresters, thereby reducing the impact of a lightning strike on people and infrastructure. (1, 3)
Please specify social innovation
The intervention could be considered a governance innovation as its implementation and maintenance depended greatly on the involvement of the local refugees through a participatory approach method. One source assesses that "The consistent engagement of all relevant stakeholders was required, including local communities, relevant government departments, camp authorities, thematic experts, academics and professionals." (1)
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The innovation is completly new and has not been developed in simillar location or conditions. (1,3)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The intervention has been similarly transferred to other camps (11) across the vicinity of Cox's Bazar. (1,2)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
- Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters: The project resulted in reduced risks from disasters Stream restoration, including bank protection, increased the water retention capacity of the river,
thereby reducing erosion and damage from flooding. (1).
- Enhanced carbon sequestration: The riparian ecosystem-restoration activities also support the functioning of the area as carbon sink (1)
- Improved air quality: Better ambient air quality, improved micro-climate within camp areas (1)
-Improved soil quality: Furthermore to stabilize slopes by increasing soil cohesion and shear strength the intervention planted legume crops to improve soil fertility, grasses for soil stabilization, riparian species for low-laying areas and bamboo for watershed management (1, 5)
- Improved water quality: The project also piloted a bacteria-based wastewater treatment plant in another camp, which was found to effectively remove pollutants from Lambasia Chhara. Wastewater treatment facilities
reduce the extent of water pollution and make the water usable for refugees and host communities (1,2)
- Increase protection against flooding: It was expected that through the stream restoration, including bank protection, the water retention capacity of the river will be increased, thereby reducing erosion and damage from flooding, as well as increasing the availability of surface water for a longer period in streams than before. (1, 5)
- Improved stormwater management: “When strong storms occur, there is still flooding but the water flows out quicker in rehabilitated areas and therefore helps mitigate the impact,” (2)
- Reduced risk of damages by drought: . Water reservoirs created within camps now store rainwater year-round and ensure water security for refugees to meet their various needs (1).
- Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems: Riparian sites were restored (1)
- Increase in the green space area and pollination: 57.2 hectares of land have been transformed with the plantation of native trees. The World Food Programme (WFP) commissioned an independent assessment of the initiative in 2020, which revealed that "80–90% of the planted trees had survived within the Camp, which also looks greener compared to 2018" (1). It was expected that the trees planted will bring back "insects, pollinators and other wildlife" therefore contributing to the creation of an environment that enhances pollination. (2)
- Reduced biodiversity loss: Kalam Chhara, a site where ecosystem restoration was done, recorded a total of 76 faunal species in October 2020, compared to a total of 34 species at other camps where no ecosystem restoration had taken place. Moreover, the highest numbers of reptilian species (15) and second highest numbers of amphibian (10) and mammalian species (six) were recorded in the Kalam Chhara restoration site, while only four species of reptiles, three amphibians and three mammals were observed in other monitoring sites within camps. This accounts for a 123% increase in wildlife in the project restoration site in Kalam Chhara. (1)
Description of economic benefits
Improved livelihood through additional sources and reduced disaster risk (1)
Description of social and cultural benefits
- Increased access to healthy food: It was reported that higher numbers of people (mostly from the Rohingya communities) were observed to engage in fishing in Kalam Chhara and Madhur Chhara waters almost year-round, which shows that greater water availability is helping diverse fish species to colonise stream habitats (1). Furthermore, 931 of households are growing vegetables supplementing therefore access to healthy food and less food insecurity. (1, 3)
- Increased knowledge about nature: More than 3,000 Bangladeshis and Rohingya refugees have received training on how to manage tree nurseries that were established, plant and care for seedlings, and protect the young trees, with 500 Rohingya being caretakers and plantation workers on a rotational basis (2,5).
- Increased feeling of safety: It was reported that refugees feel safer and are better protected than before. (1)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
- Size of the area greened
- Number of people offered training
- Survival rate of trees
- Wildlife increases
- Number of households impacted by the action (1,2,3)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown. No information regarding the pandemic have been shared.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
FAO report on the intervention (1.28 MB) 1.28 MB
List of references
1. CDKN (2022) Nature-based Solutions for urban climate resilience in South Asia: Cases from Bangladesh, India and Nepal available at https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/NbS%20Compendium_Nov%202022_final_web.pdf (Accessed on 8 March, 2023).
2. UNHCR (2021) Rohingya refugees restore depleted forest in Bangladesh. available at https://www.unhcr.org/news/stories/2021/11/618100974/rohingya-refugees-restore-depleted-forest-bangladesh.html (Accessed on 19 February, 2023)
3. UNHCR (n.d) CLIMATE ACTION available at https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/Climate%20Action-Good%20Practice%20Coxs%20Bazar%20Bangladesh.pdf (Accessed on 19 February, 2023).
4. TBS News (2021) ধ্বংসপ্রাপ্ত বন পুনরুদ্ধারে রোহিঙ্গা শরণার্থীরা available at https://www.tbsnews.net/bangla/বাংলাদেশ/ধ্বংসপ্রাপ্ত-বন-পুনরুদ্ধারে%C2%A0রোহিঙ্গা-শরণার্থীরা (Accessed on 19 February, 2023)
5. Arab News (2021), Rohingya help restore depleted Bangladesh forest in world's largest refugee camp, available at https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1965911/world (Accessed 5 March, 2023)
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees were already living in the camps in the hilly areas around Cox's Bazar, close to the border with Myanmar, for decades before the newcomers arrived (prior to 2017) but because of the influx of refugees (650k in a matter of months) refugees themselves started to cut trees to make shelters and obtain fuel. The area was part of a 15-year-old government Social Forestry Program, which was depleted.

https://news.mongabay.com/2018/01/bangladeshi-forests-stripped-bare-as-rohingya-refugees-battle-to-survive/ (An article from 2018, explaining the situation in detail)
https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/bangladesh-fao-and-rohingya-refugees-restore-forests-and-around-once-barren-camps (second source discussing reforestation)
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/71e00da4-6298-5781-a911-decb0d500ce3/content (this is an academic article discussing precisely the area and documenting how the refugee crisis caused forest loss)
https://archive.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2017/10/21/rohingya-influx-15-year-old-forestation-project-destroyed-57-days (again an article showing the depleted forests)

In our evaluation a large-scale humanitarian crisis was enfolding fast and the trees were supporting the survival of humans. The reforestation project seemingly put an end to the deforestation and demonstrating the not-cutting and replanting the trees is making the area more livable. So I think we can say that the way they are restoring the forest is a good example for NBS. Moreover, the restoration case was promoted as an NBS by CDKN and ICLEI, which also confirms that the case is a positive development in the area.
Public Images
Image
Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Source: (Ref 1)
Image
Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Source: (Ref 2)
Image
Before and after
Before and after
https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/Climate%20Action-Good%20Practice%20Coxs%20Bazar%20Bangladesh.pdf
Image
Refugee camp
Refugee camp
https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1965911/world
Please specify other source of non-financial contribution