1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Doncaster
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Revival Partnership Project
Short description of the intervention
Revival is a partnership which is committed to delivering improvements for wildlife and people on the Lower Don catchment from the Don Gorge to Goole. It enables organisations over a whole host of different sectors to come together and work under one shared vision: create a committed partnership delivering improvements for wildlife and people on the Lower Don catchment. This intervention is thus a change in the governance of natural areas in and around Doncaster that leads to projects, rather than being a specific project itself. The River Don Revival project will continue to fight for the river’s future. Firstly, an action plan will layout the manual work necessary to improve the river and the catchment as a whole. In addition, the partnership intends to work with a scheme called the NW Water Rangers to encourage the public to engage in citizen science, collecting evidence of poor water quality. The partnership will also work closely with the South Follingsby Park development to implements Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems, to create new habitats and to improve the river itself. Finally, the partnership hopes to appoint a dedicated member of staff to oversee all of the work taking place on the Don. (Ref 1, 2, 7).
Address

Doncaster
United Kingdom

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
River catchment area
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2012
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2012
End date of the intervention
ongoing
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The ‘Revival’ vision is “a committed partnership delivering improvements for wildlife and people on the Lower Don catchment from the Don Gorge to Goole”. The objectives include improving physical access to green space, develop nature tourism, empower communities to make use of local natural resources, create and restore high-quality habitats, ecological and fishery improvement. (Ref 1)
Quantitative targets
2 measures to address barriers to fish movement; 3 flow deflector sites; 430 meter of phragmites planting; 10 km of enhanced drains; 6 schools take part in the 'Eels in Schools' education and release programme; record 1 invasive species; maintain a minimum of 4 mink rafts; 20 barn owl/raptor nest boxes; improve 3 ponds as recreation area; create 10 hectares of wet woodland (Ref 4)
Monitoring indicators defined
Number of flow deflectors, meters of phragmites planting, km of enhanced drains, number of schools that take part in the 'eels in Schools' education, number of invasive species recorded, number of mink rafts maintained, number of barn owl/raptor nest boxes, number of ponds improved, hectares of wet woodland created (Ref 4).
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
Create a partnership betweeen NGOs, the national Environment Agency, regional governments, commisions and organisations; naturalisation of over-engineered river bank of River Don; Improve river habitat to increase fish population; Purchase equipment to monitor fish populations; plant trees (Ref 1, 2).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
600
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Please specify "other cultural service"
Educational purposes (Ref 4).
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Primary Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Citizens or community groups
Social enterprise
Coalition with multiple of the above
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
It is a partnership between Yorkshire Wildlife Trust (NGO), that is main responsible for the communication between the other parties, which are: the Environment Agency, Doncaster Council, Don Catchment Rivers Trust, Yorkshire Water, Natural England, South Yorkshire Forest Partnership, Doncaster Naturalists, Canal & Rivers Trust, Forestry Commission, The River Stewardship Company and Network Rail. Their individual roles are not specified (Ref 1).
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Private foundation/trust
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The project is to be part of Water Framework Directive delivery (Ref 4).
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The Revival project is part of the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy (Ref 4).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy (Ref 4).
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The intervention itself is the reorganisation of partnerships through which nature based solutions can be implemented. They also build on the work of existing networks: Don Network, South Yorkshire Nature Partnership; Dearne Valley and Humberhead Level Nature Improvement Areas (Ref 1).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
95,000 British Pounds have been raised collectively by all the partners (Ref 2)
Source(s) of funding
Please specify other source of funding
All the partners that are part of the Revival partnership collectively raised the total sum. It is not specified on which specific types of budgets they relied. (Ref 2)
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
A partnership of statutory, charity and community organisations has been created to provide better management for the execution of nature based solutions (Ref 1)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
1. The partnership resulted in the development of numerous projects including some research studies. Numerous reports have demonstrated opportunities to restore the natural river channel, create new habitats, reduce flood risk and realise an array of benefits for the River Don. Several projects have been started including the maintenance of the river channel, development of sustainable urban drainage system, reservoir management, habitats and species monitoring and land management. As an impact, the partnership resulted in highways drainage improvements in the industrial area, improved water quality with reduced nitrogen and phosphorous percentage, tree maintenance, removal of sediment, salmon and otter conservation, removal of invasive plants and increase in the water flow and reduce the effect of flood
2. At the same time, water quality in the river is continuously being monitored and gathering data to focus on improvements in the most at-risk areas. (Ref 4, 7)
Description of economic benefits
The partnership has created many projects which created new jobs and improved the catchment area. As a result of the partnership, it is expected that the financial cost for the river and the species management. (Ref 4, 7)
Description of social and cultural benefits
1. Consultations have been held with both partners and the public, and the information gathered will be used to shape the future of the Don catchment. 2. Stakeholder group formed to tackle problems. 3. Raised awareness of local businesses (Ref 4, 7)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
trees planted and maintained, species protected, protected areas from flood damages, increased water flow and new projects developed (Ref 2)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of October, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown.
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
People have filled out a questionnaire (Ref 5) and were called upon to provide inspiration and wishes for the Revival partnership (Ref 3).
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
Ref 1: Revival of the Lower River Don - A framework for Action
Ref 2: Sheffield and Rotherdam Wildlife Trust (n.d.) Waterways and Standing Water. Retrieved from https://www.wildsheffield.com/wp-content/upload%20s/2019/08/5.-WATERWAYS.pdf on 28th October, 2020.
Ref 3: Sheffield and Rotherdam Wildlife Trust (n.d.) Rotherham Rivers Project. Retrieved from https://www.wildsheffield.com/wildlife/a-living-landscape/rotherham-rivers-project/ on 28th October, 2020.
Ref 4: Metropolitan Council of Doncaster. Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy
Ref 5: Restorerivers.eu (2020) Case study:River Don Restoration project. Retrieved from https://restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Case_study%3ARiver_Don_Restoration_project on 28th October, 2020.
Ref 6: The Don Network (n.d.). Our plan for River Don. Retrieved from http://www.dcrt.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/6541-1+Don+Network+Report+lo+res.pdf on 27th October, 2020.
Ref 7: The River Trust (2019) News Section. The River Trust. Retrieved from https://www.theriverstrust.org/2019/09/12/river-don-revival/ on 27th October, 2020.
Ref 8: Don Catchment Rivers Trust (2013) Finishing for change. Retrieved from https://dcrt.org.uk/archives/1227 on 27th October, 2020.
Ref 9: Environment Agency (2010) Don Catchment Flood Management Plan 2010. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/289379/River_Don_Catchment_Flood_Management_Plan.pdf on 28th October, 2020.
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Don River Restoration
Don Catchment Rivers Trust
https://dcrt.org.uk/archives/1227