1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Genova
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Il Progetto LIFE Natura Interventi urgenti per habitat prativi prioritari del Parco Naturale Regionale del Beigua
Short description of the intervention
The BEIGUA LIFE Project focused on the development and implementation of six management plans, one for each of the priority habitat types present at the site, to safeguard and restore these endangered habitats located right outside of Genova. Several activities of soil rehabilitation were carried out through planting native species and keeping under control invasive plant species. An awareness raising campaign was held to involve local communities as well (1).
Address

Peri-urban area north of Genova
Genova
Italy

Area boundary
POINT (8.670167 44.56813)
POINT (8.591044 44.518023)
POINT (9.148341 44.323492)
POINT (8.558078 44.435127)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
http://www.parks.it/parco.beigua/map-dettaglio-agr.html
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
1998
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
1999
End date of the intervention
2000
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
Goals of the intervention were:
- to protect and enhance the biodiversity values of habitats and species present in the area,
- to develop and maintain species belonging to spontaneous flora according to natural dynamism,
- to preserve the land and to defend the soil from hydrogeological and fire fires, and
- to promote a more balanced relationship between human and territorial actions, encouraging the development of compatible socio-economic activities like animal herding and tourism (2).
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
Unknown
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
"Among the measures foreseen there was the restoration of the Monte Beigua regional park’s tracks, which were to act as firebreaks, and constant surveillance in order to prevent wildfires and to hinder their propagation. Erosion of the meadows was to be tackled by planting local varieties of shrub and sowing native grasses, which would have stabilised the subsoil. The calcareous mires would have been preserved by regular mowing to block the dynamics of their natural succession. Invading species were to be eliminated from the dry heaths to favour the re-growth of the typical vegetation. Finally, accurate management of grazing would have helped to reduce the negative effects of excessive stocking densities" (1).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Other
Please specify "other parks or (semi)natural urban green area"
Wild grasslands; restoration of the Monte Beigua regional park’s tracks (1)
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Raw materials
Genetic materials from all biota
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Pest and disease control
Other
Cultural services
Tourism
Please specify "other habitat and supporting service"
defend the soil from hydrogeological and fire fires, (Ref 2)
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Please specify "other primary beneficiary"
herding animals and tourists (2)
Please specify other local relevant strategy
Law n. 157 of 11th February 1992 (http://www.minambiente.it/pagina/direttiva-uccelli).
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The Italian League for the Protection of Birds (LIPU) is a national NGO founded in 1965 and the coordinator of the project in partnership with Ente Parco Beigua-IT (1).
The project mentions NBS as part of the implementation activities in line with the goals of the EU LIFE Project (1, 2 and 3).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
EU body
Non-government organisation/civil society
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
Nature protection and Biodiversity
Directive 79/409 - Conservation of wild birds (02.04.1979)
Directive 92/43 - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora- Habitats Directive
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
Law n. 157 of 11th February 1992 (http://www.minambiente.it/pagina/direttiva-uccelli).
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The project mentions NBS as part of the implementation activities in line with the goals of the LIFE Project (1, 2 and 3).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
native plant species, control invasive plant species (1)
maintain species belonging to spontaneous flora according to natural dynamism; defend the soil from hydrogeological and fire fires (2)
firebreaks, meadows, shrub and sowing native grasses (1)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Since the BEIGUA Natural Park protection Project was part of the LIFE Project network, it was carried out together with similar interventions in other Italian national parks (3).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project is financed by EU funding through the LIFE Project Network, which provided 256,076.70 € (1).
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
512,153.40 € of which 256,076.70 € were provided by the EU (1).
Source(s) of funding
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Please specify other environmental impact
- Surveillance against fires was carried out. For this specific task a group of volunteers was created.
- The surveillance activity also led to detect an unknown nesting pair of golden eagle in the area (1)
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
Restoration of a degraded wild habitat through planting of local plant species, eradication of invasive species, and implementation of preservation and monitoring measures (1, 2 and 3).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project had the following environmental benefits:
- Implementation of some of the actions foreseen in the management plans, such as restoration of fire cutting trails and elimination of invasive vegetation (1)

Restoration of a degraded wild habitat through planting of local plant species, eradication of invasive species, and implementation of preservation and monitoring measures (1, 2 and 3).

Economic impacts
Please specify other socio-cultural impact
- Management plans of the EU interest habitats "dry heaths", “sub-continental steppe grassland”, “species rich Nardus grasslands” and “calcareous fens” were realised. The Beigua Park, partner of the project, has used the documents realised for its own planning activity (1)
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
- Public awareness campaign. The campaign carried out by the beneficiary and the partner has contributed to a greater awareness of the nature values of the site and more in general of the Natura 2000 network. (1).
-- Surveillance against fires was carried out. For this specific task a group of volunteers was created.
(1)

Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown

Environmental, social and economic impacts
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
unspecified: implementation of preservation and monitoring measures (1, 2 and 3).
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of September 10 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
Yes
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unspecified: implementation of preservation and monitoring measures (1, 2 and 3).
- Management plans of the EU interest habitats "dry heaths", “sub-continental steppe grassland”, “species rich Nardus grasslands” and “calcareous fens” were realised. The Beigua Park, partner of the project, has used the documents realised for its own planning activity (1)
-As project is part of the Natura 2000 network. (1) it likely used tools from this project to evaluate.

Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
- Surveillance against fires was carried out. For this specific task a group of voluntaries was created.
(1)
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Europa.eu (2000), Beigua - Beigua : urgent interventions for priority grasslands, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.dspPage&n_proj_id=295 (Accessed 4-9-2020)

2. Parco Beiuga (no date), NBS official website, Available at http://www.parcobeigua.it/pagina.php?id=27 (Accessed 4-9-2020)

3. Ministero dell’Ambiente, LIFE publication, Available at http://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/biblioteca/protezione_natura/dpn_bilancio_life_natura.pdf (Accessed 4-9-2020)

4. LIPU Italia, Official website, Available at http://www.lipu.it/ (Accessed 4-9-2020)
Comments and notes
Comments
2020 comment:
The database kept crashing while inserting the info and I lost a lot of time in doing the work.
Additional insights
"The Monte Beigua pSCI is a mountainous area in the Ligurian Apennines on the border between the provinces of Genova and Savona. It is the most important bottleneck in northern Italy for the spring migration of falcons, including the priority species Falco naumanni and Falco eleonorae. The northern slopes of the pSCI are covered by deciduous woods while the southern slopes are covered in pines. It has 15 Habitats Directive habitat types, of which 6 are priority habitats. The area is within Italy’s high-risk zone for wildfires. These fires, always caused by human actions, are, together with erosion, leading to the degradation of the grass swards which in turn is altering the plant communities of the meadows, opening the way for invading species to spread at the expense of the more ecologically relevant ones. The meadows are also affected by overgrazing by sheep while the site’s wetlands are gradually terrestrializing as a result of natural succession." (1).
Public Images
Image
Arial view of the NBS
http://www.parcobeigua.it/pagina.php?id=89
Image
View of the NBS
http://www.parcobeigua.it/pagina.php?id=89