1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Karlsruhe
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Landschaftspark Rhein
Short description of the intervention
As part of the “Landscape Park Rhine”, a key project of the Karlsruhe Master Plan 2015, the city of Karlsruhe implemented the “Park Maxau” project module, which is the most important element of the larger landscape project. (Ref. 3) The “Park Maxau” is a park within an agricultural area which with its new leaseholders, has mostly been converted into ecological agricultural fields and grazing areas. (Ref. 3) Major goals were linking green corridors with the Pamina Rhine park, creating a connected recreational area and enhancing ecological diversity. The “Rhine Promenade” pedestrian route, Rhine terraces and a children’s playground were created, a visitor guidance system was introduced, and an estate was revived as a restaurant. During the 17-month development process, citizens were given the opportunity to offer their ideas and suggestions about the project through internet surveys, interviews and a citizens' conference. (Ref. 6) The area has become a hotspot for ecological agriculture, environmental education and recreation (Ref. 10).
Address

Unnamed Road
76187 Karlsruhe
Germany

Area boundary
POINT (8.30558 49.03751)
POINT (8.30207 49.01787)
POINT (8.34455 49.02074)
POINT (8.33451 49.03577)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Reference 2: http://www.peter2-hartleb.de/Hofgut_Maxau/Hofgut_Maxau.html
Total area
208600.00m²
NBS area
208600.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2007
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2011
End date of the intervention
2015
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
-Environmentally and ecologically sound development of the recreation area between the Rhine and the Knielinger lake to increase biodiversity. (Ref. 3)
-Introducing recreational areas and activities for city residents around the estate Maxau (Ref. 3)
-Developing a strategic visitor guidance concept with the objective to release pressure from ecologically fragile stretches (Ref. 3)
-Improvement of the landscape ecosystem by changing from intensive agriculture to organic agriculture and grazing areas (Ref. 3)
-Reviving cultural heritage by making use of domestic crop varieties in agriculture (Ref. 3).
-Introduction of environmental education concepts in collaboration with the "Birkenhof" and the nature conservation centre. (Ref. 3)
Quantitative targets
1/3 of the agricultural area shall consist of organic agriculture coupled with educational activities (Ref. 3)
Transforming 208,600 sqm of intensive agriculture into 125,150 sqm of extensive rich pasture, 10,250 sqm annually newly created agricultural fallow land and 2,500 sqm of forb communities within the extensive agricultural area (Ref. 3)
Monitoring indicators defined
Unknown
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The revival of the old estate Maxau and the surrounding area by appointing new leaseholders (an agriculturist and a biologist) who in addition to the restaurant are responsible for ecologically sound agricultural farming and animal husbandry. They offer guided tours for visiting families and school groups to provide insights into modern agriculture (Ref. 2). Information boards on the different stations in the park explaining the unique nature, biodiversity and economic value of the area were set up. (Ref. 2). The Rhine promenade which was created on top of the dike to connect bicycle and walking routes with the Pamina national park attract city residents to the riverbanks of the Rhine (Ref. 2). The “Rhine terrace”, consisting of 26 stairs which invite visitors to sit down and watch the river and ships were implemented and a playground was created. (Ref. 3 and 5).
Type of NBS project
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Green playgrounds and school grounds
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Green corridors and green belts
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The project was initiated and led by the local government, who appointed new leaseholders (an agriculturist and a biologist) who in addition to the restaurant are responsible for ecologically sound agricultural farming and animal husbandry. (Ref. 2).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Land owners
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The project "landscape park Rhine" formed part of the "Masterplan Karlsruhe 2015" which consisted of 12 action fields, one of which was environment, more specifically the creation of green, ecological corridors by connecting urban green patches and islands (Ref. 6). Different measures inside and outside the city were implemented to fulfill this goal (Ref. 7). The concept landscape park Rhine, which consists of several building blocks, is a result of the open space development plan 2015 issued by the city of Karlsruhe (Ref. 3).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The project "landscape park Rhine" formed part of the "Masterplan Karlsruhe 2015" which consisted of 12 action fields, one of which was environment, more specifically the creation of green, ecological corridors by connecting urban green patches and islands (Ref. 6).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Please specify other vegetation type
Crops (Ref. 3)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
It is stated that the intervention is also a result of a continuous dialogue between the interdisciplinary working group "landscape park Rhine", whose members also form part of various associations and institutions involved in the process (Ref. 3).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
No
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
5,000,000
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The whole landscape park Rhine costed 5 Mio EUR (Ref. 9) and consists of several building blocks with the park Maxau being the most important part. Some more info: the playground and the Rhine terraces costed 820.000 EUR, 2 Mio EUR were stated to be invested in the estate Maxau for reviving its function (Ref. 5).
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
The project could be considered a governance innovation since so many different stakeholders involved in its implementation and successfully collaborated to make it happen: 25 companies involved, several city departments and agencies. Another innovation is the variety of ecological, pedagogical, economic and environmental aspects considered in the project design (Ref. 10).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Increasing biodiversity was a major expected impact, however, according to a newspaper article despite the visitor guidance concept, in which not all of the ecologically fragile areas could be considered, combining recreation with conservation is a challenge and the project has not demonstrably improved habitat conservation due to trash problems and noise from human activities (Ref. 9). However, the project has increased green space area with the conversion of agricultural land to grazing areas and the creation of the park for recreation. (Ref. 1, 3)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
The area is actively used for recreation. The use of traditionally used local crops and reintroduction of domestic plants contribute to the preservation of natural heritage. The shift to ecological agriculture supports and improves the sustainability of agriculture in the area. The guided tours and information boards provide insights into sustainable agriculture, nature and biodiversity and thus support environmental education. (Ref. 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown (in October 2020)
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
An architectural walk was organized with representatives from the city council and citizens to see and discuss the measures implemented (Ref. 10).
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
map_of_rhine_park_area.pdf (101.45 KB) 101.45 KB
information_sign_rhine_park.pdf (164.62 KB) 164.62 KB
rhine_terrace.pdf (93.48 KB) 93.48 KB
view_of_the_estate.pdf (45.65 KB) 45.65 KB
multi-generational_playground.pdf (201.72 KB) 201.72 KB
List of references
1. NABU Gruppe Karlsruhe (no date) Rheinpark mit Hofgut Maxau. Available at: http://www.hofgut-maxau.de/rheinpark.html [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

2. Hartleb, P. (2017) Hofgut Maxau. Available at: http://www.peter2-hartleb.de/Hofgut_Maxau/Hofgut_Maxau.html [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

3. Henz, T., Henz, A., Müller, H.-V., Schäfter, C. and Bellm, K. (2010) Landschaftspark Rhein - Park Maxau - Projektbeschreibung für den Antrag auf die naturschutzrechtliche Genehmigung des Vorhabens. Karlsruhe. Available at: http://www.burgau-knielingen.de/mediapool/92/926875/data/Rheinpark_Projektbeschreibung_20100800.pdf [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

4. Bildungsverein Region Karlsruhe e.V. (2012) Landschaftspark Rhein, Stadtwiki Karlsruhe. Available at: https://ka.stadtwiki.net/Landschaftspark_Rhein#Geschichte [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

5. Ka-news.de (2012) ‘Raus an den Rhein: Dammterrassen und Spielplatz beim Hofgut Maxau eröffnet’, ka-news.de. Available at: https://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/Karlsruhe~/Raus-an-den-Rhein-Dammterrassen-und-Spielplatz-beim-Hofgut-Maxau-eroeffnet;art6066,867168 [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

6. Stadt Karlsruhe (2011) Der Masterplan 2015 – Eine Perspektive für das Karlsruhe von morgen. Available at: https://www.karlsruhe.de/b4/buergerengagement/masterplan_2015.de [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

7. Stadt Karlsruhe (2013) Grünsystem der Stadt Karlsruhe. Available at: https://www.karlsruhe.de/b3/freizeit/gruenflaechen/gruensystem.de [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

8. Fulda, C. and Miles, S. (2012) Karlsruhe 2020 : Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept. Karlsruhe. Available at: https://www.karlsruhe.de/b4/buergerengagement/karlsruhe2020.de [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].

9. Stammmschröer, K. (2014) ‘Landschaftspark ist auf der Zielgeraden.’, Badische Neueste Nachrichten, 26 September. [Weblink unavailable in 2020].

10. n.a. (2015) ‘Landschaftspark Rhein: Karlsruhe zieht es an den Rhein’, Karlsruher Stadtzeitung. Available at: https://presse.karlsruhe.de/db/stadtzeitung/jahr2015/woche27/landschaftspark_rhein_karlsruhe_zieht_es_an_den_rhein.html. [Accessed: 27 Oct. 2020].
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Rhine terrace at the Landscape Park
Rhine terrace at the Landscape Park
Reference 2
Image
Grazing area
Grazing area
Reference 10