1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Munich
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Isar-plan
Short description of the intervention
Isar River had been regulated at the end of the 19th century by forcing the river into a canal-type bed with embankments. This regulation made a negative impact on the flow velocity of the river, on its temperature balance, and increased the risk of flooding. The goal of the recent development was to restore the river's natural character on an 8-kilometre-long section of the river and to create a semi-natural riverside. (Reference 1, 2) This was considered especially important because the effects of climate change have already increased the frequency of heavy rain events and major floods. (Reference 3) The new concept leaves space for the river to shape and change its bed with every flood. Further aims of the project were to increase biodiversity and recreational quality.
Address

München
Germany

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Urban river
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
1995
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2000
End date of the intervention
2011
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
- Improving flood protection by increasing the water retention capacity of the 8km long river stretch;
- Returning the riverside area into a near-natural state;
- Restoring ecological functions;
- Improving the water quality;
- Improving biodiversity;
- Improving recreational quality (Reference 1, 3).
Quantitative targets
- reconstruction of approximately 8 kilometers of the Isar River (Reference 2)
Monitoring indicators defined
- increased biodiversity
- water quality that allows bathing everywhere in the river except places being considered as dangerous
- better access of people to the riverside (Reference 2)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
Installations were put in place to improve flood protection. The river bed was broadened and returned to a more natural state by implementing natural river bottom rock ramps or slides with riffles and pools, instead of linear low weirs. (Reference 3) The cross-section of the river was widened from 50m to 90m by the removal of surface embankments, and thus an increased capacity in river runoff was established. (Reference 2) To improve water quality, communities situated on the Isar have completed the process of upgrading their waste-water treatment plants to include UV germicidal irradiation systems. (Reference 5) The technically designed cross-river sills which were in place before, with linear cross-sections that are spaced at 200 meters with drops of maximum one meter cannot be passed by fish in most cases. These have been replaced by flat ramps with stone rock steps in honeycomb design with intermediate pools. “In areas with reduced dyke safety, new dykes were filled in front of the old ones in order to maintain the airside tree population.” (Reference 3)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Researchers, university
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
"Since 1995, an interdisciplinary working group including members of Munich city council and the local water authority have been developing a concept for restoring the Isar course in the southern inner-city area of Munich to its natural state. The project takes relevant results of a comprehensive resident survey into account" (Reference 1). "The “Isar-Plan” is a joint project managed by the State of Bavaria and the City of Munich. It is led by the state and is represented by Munich’s State Office of Water Management. In a resolution passed by the city council in 2000, the city’s Department of Public Construction was assigned the project. Since then, it has assumed responsibility for all costs, deadlines and quality-related aspects for the City of Munich as a project partner" (Reference 2).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Public sector institution
Land owners
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
One of the reason behind the initiation of the project was that already in the 1990s some parts of the river did not match the new flood protection standards (Reference 2)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The project was carried out in accordance with the Isar-plan (Reference 2).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project was carried out in accordance with the Isar-plan which aimed to restore the river's natural character and to create a semi-natural riverside (Reference 2).
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
In 1995, the project group “IsarPlan” was initiated [...]. An interdisciplinary research group and a panel of experts, which included representatives from the district policy committees and the “Isar-Allianz”, assisted and accompanied the project [...]. The working group examined the flood-water situation, the need for recreational areas at the riverside, and the area’s animal and plant worlds and their habitats. Based on their findings, they defined the following development goals: • Improved protection against flooding
• Development of a more natural river landscape
• Improved recreational quality" (Reference 2).
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
35,000,000
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The total cost of the investment was 35 million EUR, which was shared by the City of Munich (45 %) and the State of Bavaria (55 %). (Reference 1).
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Please specify other environmental impact
Improved habitat for species
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify system innovation
"The “Isar-Plan” project in Munich is a groundbreaking example showing how synergies can be created and proving the sustainable character of landscaping measures in cities. In doing so, a semi-natural riverside area is recovered, quality of life in a large city and flood protection are improved - an aspect of which city, nature and man may altogether benefit. Essential factors of success were that urban and riverside area development aspects were taken into account and that a related cooperation across different disciplines and institutions was established. In this context, the City of Munich and the Federal State of Bavaria have combined and concentrated the necessary professional, personal and financial resources in a target-oriented way. The city council of Munich and the Munich water authority supported this ambitious project by continuously consulting the urban residents [...] (Reference 1).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Greater flood runoff and other restoration measures had a significant effect on the extent of the damages caused by floods after the implementation. Compared to other parts in the South of Germany, the flooding did not cause substantial damages in Munich due to the restoration of the Isar river. (Reference 2, 3) Water quality also improved due to the widening of the river and the measures taken by communities situated on the Isar. (Reference 4) Water and land habitats have become more favourable. Fish are now more able to move in the river and with increased dike safety, the tree population is also better protected. Adequate water supply and quality improved the habitat of fauna and flora. (Reference 4)
Economic impacts
Please specify other socio-cultural impact
More aesthetically pleasing landscape and greater accessibility of the river
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
Gravel surfaces and natural bank formations contributed greatly to the recreational quality of the riverbank. The recreational quality has greatly improved, the restored Isar is, especially in summer, one of the favourite places of Munich citizens. (Reference 3) With the improved water quality and access to waterline, swimming in the Isar is now. The project also created a more attractive landscape. (Reference 2)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
- extent of damages caused by flooding
- water quality
- number of people using the river for recreation
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Not applicable, as the project was already finished by 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
The project took relevant results of a comprehensive resident survey into account."
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
1. Werkstattstadt.de. (2017) Semi-natural riverside area in the inner city: München „Isar-Plan“ (Bavaria). Available at: http://www.werkstatt-stadt.de/en/projects/68/- [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020].
2. Wasserwirtschaftsamt München and Landeshauptstadt München. (2011). Isar-plan: A new lease of life for the Isar River! Munich: Color Gruppe. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/3768185/a-new-lease-of-life-for-the-isar-river-wasserwirtschaftsamt-munchen [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
3. Climate Adapt. (2015) Water management plan and restoration of the Isar River, Munich. [online] Available at: https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/metadata/case-studies/isar-plan-2013-water-management-plan-and-restoration-of-the-isar-river-munich-germany [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
4. Landeshaupstadt München. (nd.) Der Isar Plan - Befreiung der Isar aus ihrem Korsett. [online]. Available at: https://www.muenchen.de/rathaus/Stadtverwaltung/baureferat/freizeit-sport-natur/isar/isar-plan.html [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2020]
5. Landeshaupstadt München. (nd) Der Isar Plan - Projektdokumentation.
Additional comments
1. Reference 1 mentions that a survey was done, but I don't have access to the survey itself, so I can't link it.
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Source: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/3768185/a-new-lease-of-life-for-the-isar-river-wasserwirtschaftsamt-munchen
Image
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Source: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/3768185/a-new-lease-of-life-for-the-isar-river-wasserwirtschaftsamt-munchen
Image
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Semi-natural riverside creation for Isar river
Source: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/3768185/a-new-lease-of-life-for-the-isar-river-wasserwirtschaftsamt-munchen