1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Münster
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa
Short description of the intervention
The renaturalization of streams is a common strategy for improving the ecological quality of water bodies as mandated by the European Water Directive. For that reason, parts of the Aa stream in Münster upstream until its flow into the Aa lake covering 2.6 km were renaturalized from 2012 to 2013. Renaturalization is a means to restore the natural river banks, local ecosystems of the Aa rive and improve the water quality of the Aa lake (Ref. 1 and 3).
Address

Münster
Germany

Area boundary
POINT (7.614112 52.095242)
POINT (7.622352 51.956451)
POINT (7.291732 51.976758)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
https://www.flussgebiete.nrw.de/system/files/atoms/files/05_hymo_ms_reloe.pdf (Ref. 6)
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Aa stream in Münster upstream (ref. 1)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2012
End date of the intervention
2013
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
-Improving the water quality of the Aa stream (Ref. 1 and 4)
-Reestablishing the ecological balance of the Aa lake as an important recreational area for the citizens of Münster (Ref. 4)
-Reducing blue algae bloom and silting in the Aa lake (Ref. 3)
-Increase the biodiversity in the water bodies and along the river banks (Ref. 4)
Quantitative targets
Renaturalizing a 2,4 km stretch of the Aa stream between Sentruper Street and its river mouth in the Aa lake (Ref. 1)
Monitoring indicators defined
Water quality, number of animals and plants species in the water body and riverbanks ecosystems, amount of algae, river flow velocity (Ref 1-4)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The natural meandering structure of the river was reestablished, its concrete river bed removed, river banks greened to create a natural barrier between the river and adjacent agricultural spaces, was reestablished. The reinstatement of natural elements such as dead wood shall reinforce the regeneration of the water body (Ref. 1).
To prevent further silting of the Aa lake, a sand filter was built into the upper stream which will save the costs of mud removal from the lake (Ref. 4).
In one part of the intervention area, renaturalization had been employed in 1996 already. However, this gave rise to the development of still waters in the Aa stream which affect the natural flow of the river and causes algae bloom during the summer months. The intervention created new river arms disconnected from these still waters to reestablish the natural water flow and improve the water quality in these stretches (Ref. 1)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Blue infrastructure
Lakes/ponds
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Pollination
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The intervention was planned and carried out by the city department for civil engineering works with the majority funded by the regional government of North-Rhine-Westphalia (Ref. 3).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Please specify other land owner
Aa stream in Münster upstream (ref. 1)
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Please specify other landowner
Aa stream in Münster upstream (ref. 1)
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The European Water Framework Directive's goal (following WFD) is safeguarding the quality of water bodies and ground water. It mandates that until 2015, 2027 at the latest, water bodies within the EU shall be in good condition which is to be achieved by a close collaboration of responsible authorities, implementing bodies, associations and interest groups. In addition, the active involvement of the public plays an important role (Ref. 2).
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Close collaboration of regional and local bodies is explicitly encouraged. For this intervention several bodies joined to create an online platform that provides an overview of all the measures set and in preparation regionally to fulfill the WFD. Apart from the city of Münster, authorities of the different rural districts of NRW initiated and maintain this platform (Ref. 2).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The regional government of NRW bears 80 percent of the costs since it is an obligatory EU measure (Ref. 3).
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The costs are indicated with almost 1 Mio EUR. 80 percent are borne by the regional government of NRW (since the measures are mandatory based on EU regulations), 200,000 EUR are borne by the city department for civil engineering works (Ref. 3).
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The natural meandering structure of the river was reestablished, its concrete river bed removed, river banks greened to create a natural barrier between the river and adjacent agricultural spaces, was reestablished. The reinstatement of natural elements such as dead wood shall reinforce the regeneration of the water body (Ref. 1).
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Renaturalization is a common procedure that has been applied for decades. Ever since 1995 there have been renaturalization works in the area and there are others just being conducted (Ref. 5).
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
- The project aimed to act as part of the program of the WFD is the "Living Waters program", with which the measures to improve the water structure and the continuity were concretized and implemented. The program not only contributed to achieving ecological goals and improving the ability of ecological systems to adapt to climate change but also to flood retention, nature conservation and regional and urban development (ref. 2)
- Floodplains and floodplains of rivers were preserved and developed as natural retention areas; lost retention areas were regained (ref. 2)
- human activities generate wastewater in commerce, industry, agriculture, households and transport. The EC Water Framework Directive (EC WFD) forms the formal and legal basis for the management of water bodies. It provides for the water bodies to be restored to good condition (followed by the project) (ref. 2)
- The Aa and the area on its banks absorb high water levels in rainy times before the residents' cellars fill up (ref. 4)
- In the section between Haus Kump and Aasee, a section of flowing water - separated from the still water areas achieved good water quality
- Reestablished the ecological balance of the Aa lake as an important recreational area for the citizens of Münster (Ref. 4)
- Increased biodiversity in the water bodies and along the river banks (Ref. 4)
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
Unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
- The proejct reestablished the ecological balance of the Aa lake as an important recreational area for the citizens of Münster (Ref. 4)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of 9 August 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
No impact assessment was performed.
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
1. Stadt Münster Umweltamt. (2010a). Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa Sentruper Str. bis Aasee. Available at: http://www.vision-wasser.de/kooperationen/ms/ms-aa/206.html (Accessed 9 August 2020)
2. Stadt Münster Umweltamt. (2010b). Vision Wasser. Available at: http://www.vision-wasser.de/umsetzung/ziele.html (Accessed 9 August 2020)
3. Speckmann, L. (2012). ‘Der Aasee kommt ins Gleichgewicht. Der Zufluss wird renaturiert’, Westfälische Nachrichten, 15 July. Available at: https://www.wn.de/Kommentar/2012/07/Der-Aasee-kommt-ins-Gleichgewicht-Der-Zufluss-wird-renaturiert (Accessed 9 August 2020)
4. Stadt Münster Presse- und Informationsamt. (2012). Aa auf dem Weg zurück zur Natur. Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa von der Sentruper Straße bis zum Aasee / Ökologische Verbesserung. Available at: https://www.muenster.de/stadt/presseservice/pressemeldungen/web/frontend/output/standard/page/22/show/830657 (Accessed 9 August 2020)
5. Stadt Münster, Kreis Coesfeld, Kreis Steinfurt, WLV and Kreis Warendorf. (2010). Münstersche Aa. Available at: http://www.vision-wasser.de/kooperationen/ms/ms-aa.html (Accessed 9 August 2020)
6. Umsetzungspfad Lebendige Gewässer- Beispiele der Stadt Münster. (2013). Available at: https://www.flussgebiete.nrw.de/system/files/atoms/files/05_hymo_ms_reloe.pdf (Accessed 9 August 2020)
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa
Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa
Source: Ref. 1
Image
Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa
Renaturierung der Münsterschen Aa
Source: Ref. 1