1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
New Delhi
Region
Asia
Short description of the intervention
The Neela Hauz lake, part of the Neela Hauz biodiversity park, is a natural depression that was once a major source of drinking water for south Delhi, India (Ref 1). Due to nearby road construction and neglect, the lake was filled with solid waste and construction debris for many years. In 2015, based on the request of neighbourhood colonies, the Delhi High Court ordered the restoration of the lake. The Delhi Development Authority (DDA), in collaboration with the Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystem (CEMDE) of the University of Delhi, carried out the restoration and revival of the lake using a Constructed Wetland System (CWS). Using the help of natural landscaping composed of oxidation ponds, pebble beds, and furrows having aquatic plants, now the sewage from nearby residential colonies is treated before passing it to the lake (Ref 2). The wetland now converts approximately 1 million litres of sewage per day which has resulted in satisfactory water quality levels (Ref 1). The lake, along with the surrounding biodiversity park, attracts many migratory birds and is also a tourist attraction point in the city. The success story of the lake now has become a model case for the revival of other lakes in the city (Ref 1).
Address

Near Sanjay Van, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, Vasant Kunj
New Delhi 110067
India

Area boundary
POINT (77.170077029393 28.527483906094)
POINT (77.171337667564 28.528153166142)
POINT (77.170908514144 28.529896992784)
POINT (77.17052221293 28.528888536923)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Image 1: The Project Website. URL: https://www.delhibiodiversityparks.org/neela-hauz.html (before and after pictures). Accessed on 23 January 2023.
Image 2: Google maps. URL: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Water+Body,+NeelaHauz+%2F+Sonia+Vihar/@28.5289483,77.1698194,710m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x390d1df226f3db35:0x77f31eb2cf080e8e!8m2!3d28.5284867!4d77.1708494!16s%2Fg%2F11s90blvb3?hl=en-GB. Accessed on 15 February 2023.
Total area
25000.00m²
NBS area
25000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Waste dump area (wastewater, household waste, and construction waste) from nearby locations and infrastructure projects (Ref 1, 2)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2015
End date of the intervention
2016
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The overall goal of the project was to restore the Neela Hauz lake, part of the Neela Hauz biodiversity park, to its original state (Ref 1, 2).
Specific goals of the intervention include:
1. Development of a Constructed Wetland System (CWS) to treat sewage water through bioremediation. (Ref 1, 2, 3)
2. Desilting of the lake bed to enhance the storage capacity of the lake. (Ref 1)
3. To support a variety of aquatic birds and contribute to the ecological health of the biodiversity park.
4. To maintain the ecological balance in the biodiversity park by planting native tree species.
5. To improve the aesthetics by "landscaping the area and creation of mounts that offer a picturesque view of the area" (Ref 3);
Quantitative targets
- Usage of 20 different types of aquatic plant species to improve water quality. (Ref 1)
- Treatment of a million litres of sewage from the nearby neighbourhood. (Ref 3)
Monitoring indicators defined
- The dissolved oxygen (DO) level and BOD level. (Ref 1)
- Number of species of birds recorded. (Ref 1)
- Number and type of native trees and shrubs in the biodiversity park. (Ref 3)
- Number of existing and newly planted native species. (Ref 3)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The lake was critical to maintain water levels in south Delhi, especially the Mehrauli block, where the water table
had fallen drastically. It was decided to use raw sewage mixed with STP-treated water to maintain water levels in the lake since it is otherwise dependent solely on rainwater. Desiltation of the lake had increased the lake's depth and ability to store water. The silted materials were used for the landscaping in the area and for creating mounts to allow recreation and tourism (Ref 1, 3). A system of constructed wetlands was developed comprised of two open oxidation ponds and three physical treatment plants with different gradient channels and a mix of pebbles, gravels, and furrows with aquatic plants (Ref 1). The raw sewage and STP-treated water (designated as wastewater) passed through a constructed wetland system before it enters the lake. (Ref 2). More than 10,000 native species were planted by 4000 students and locals (Ref 2). This process uses zero energy natural process to clean sewage water and utilize this as the main source of the lake's input. The water is purified by storing raw sewage in vacant land for oxidation and aerobic digestion and storing sewage water in ponds with a variety of aquatic plants capable of removing toxic chemicals (Ref 1, 2, 3). The implementation activities also include developing walking trails around the lake with proper sitting areas for recreation (Ref 3). After the revival of the wetland, the site is now used as an example of ecological restoration for educational purposes (Ref 3).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Lakes/ponds
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Please specify "other parks or (semi)natural urban green area"
Biodiversity Park (Ref 1)
What is the level of innovation / development of the NBS related to water management?
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
15000 trees and shrubs (Ref 1)
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Researchers, university
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystem (CEMDE), Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi provided the technical inputs and carried out the implementation, while Delhi Development Authority (DDA) provided the funding for implementation (Ref 1, 3).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Citizens or community group
Researchers/university
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
No
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Please specify other type of voluntary intervention
The intervention at Neela Hauz lake was not implemented in response to a national regulation, strategy, or plan. It was carried out in response to a petition filed by local residents in Delhi's High Court. The court handed over the responsibility of restoring the lake to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) under its Delhi Biodiversity Foundation. The DDA carried out the revival process in collaboration with the Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystems. (Ref 1)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Please specify other vegetation type
Aquatic plant species were planted for the constructed wetland, specifically chosen for reducing toxicity and improving water quality (Ref 1)
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
University of Guelph in Canada has expressed its interest in collaborating with the people behind the successful restoration of the Neela Hauz biodiversity project. Additionally, students from Harvard University were set to visit the Neela Hauz site in 2019 (Ref 3). These visits suggest that there is some level of interest in the project from academic and research institutions.
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Please specify technological innovation
The NBS intervention at Neela Hauz is a technological innovation, specifically a product and process innovation. The intervention used a constructed wetland system to treat sewage water and improve water quality, which involved physical treatment plants, oxidation ponds, and furrows and ridges with aquatic plants. The process of treating sewage water using the constructed wetland system is a new and innovative way of improving water quality. (Ref 1, 2)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The sources do not mention if the Neela Hauz Biodiversity Park initiative was influenced by previous initiatives or if it was completely new without connections to previous initiatives.
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The regeneration model has proved so successful that officials have submitted the concept to the Delhi Jal Board for implementation in other water bodies across Delhi. (Ref 1)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The lake, along with the surrounding biodiversity park, attracts many migratory birds and is also a tourist attraction point in the city. It is expected that within two years the Neela Hauz Biodiversity Park will become a paradise for bird lovers and for nature lovers. Since its revival. Migratory birds have started to visit the lake again. Around 100 species of birds have been recorded there, which is considered an increase (Ref 1).
The constructed wetland converts one million litres of sewage water per day into clean water comparable to tap water with a BOD value of less than 4mg/litre, per day, clean enough for freshwater ecosystems (Ref 3). Various water quality indicators improved significantly due to the implementation of the CWS, such as Acidity/pH level from 7.8 to 6.78, BOD from 40 to 4, COD from 80 to 0.7, Dissolved Oxygen from 0 to 3.4, Phosphates 103 to 14, and Total Dissolved Solids from 600 to 298 (Ref 1).
The storage capacity of the lake is enhanced by constructing a mini runoff river check dam in order to attract
aquatic birds (Ref 1). Water is passed through various physical channels or treatment points to also manage water flow volumes before it enters the lake (Ref 1).
More than 15,000 saplings of native trees and shrubs belonging to six biological communities have been planted in the biodiversity park, leading to an increase in the number of species present (Ref 3).
The desilting from the lake was used for the landscaping in the area and the creation of mounts (Ref 3).
The lake was a derelict dumping ground for construction materials, sewage, and waste previously, the project has restored the ecosystem of the area and converted it into a biodiversity park (Ref 1, 2).
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
No economic benefits are mentioned.
Description of social and cultural benefits
The lake, along with the surrounding biodiversity park, attracts many migratory birds and is also a tourist attraction point in the city, primarily for bird watchers and nature lovers. (Ref 1, 3)
Walking trails have also been developed around the lake with proper sitting areas at regular intervals, which led to an increase in recreational visits. Caretakers at the site claimed that it attracts a large number of tourists on daily basis in winter. (Ref 3)
The project also supported education and research. University of Guelph, Canada had expressed its interest to collaborate with the brains behind the successful restoration of the Neela Hauz biodiversity project. Apart from this, students from Harvard University were set to visit the Neela Hauz site in 2019 (Ref 3).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
- Acidity/pH level, BOD, COD, Dissolved Oxygen, Phosphates, and Total Dissolved Solids (Ref 1).
- Increase in bird species (Ref 1).
- The number and type of native tree and shrub species belonging to different biological communities planted in the biodiversity park (Ref 3).
- The number of visitors (Ref 3).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
No
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
No
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
No
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
sr_54_6_22-23.pdf (244.45 KB) 244.45 KB
List of references
1. Jaggi, M. (2017), Neela Hauz Biodiversity Park - From Barren to Beautiful. 54(06). Science Reporter, available at - http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/bitstream/123456789/42134/1/SR%2054%286%29%2022-23.pdf (accessed 23-01-2023)
2. Delhi Biodiversity Foundation (no date), available at https://www.delhibiodiversityparks.org/neela-hauz.html (accessed 23-01-2023)
3. Singh P 2019, Once a dumping ground, Neela Hauz now a soothing site. Business Standard, 17 May, https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/once-a-dumping-ground-neela-hauz-now-a-soothing-site-119051700243_1.html (accessed 23-01-2023)
4. Onmanorama news: Neela Hauz: A dumping ground transformed into scenic landscape, 17 May 2019, viewed on 15 February 2023, https://www.onmanorama.com/lifestyle/news/2019/05/17/neela-hauz-dumping-ground-transformed-scenic-landscape.html (accessed 23-01-2023)
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Neela Hauz
Neela Hauz: A dumping ground transformed into scenic landscape
Ref. 4.
Image
Neela Hauz
Neela Hauz Biodiversity Park
Ref. 2.
Image
Before and after restoration
Before and after restoration
Source: https://www.delhibiodiversityparks.org/neela-hauz.html