1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Venezia
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
LIFE Seagrass Restoration (SERESTO)
Short description of the intervention
The project LIFE SeResto (LIFE12 NAT/IT/000331) aimed to trigger a process of aquatic recolonisation in “Northern Lagoon of Venice”, mainly through the transplantation of "Zostera marina" and "Zostera noltei" to small sites distributed throughout the area. The proposed intervention technique involved transplanting a small number of plants, with advantages in terms of lower costs and impact on the donor sites (1).
Address

Northen Venetian Lagoon
Venezia
Italy

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Lagoon. The total area was not mentioned in the references. It was a multiple locations intervention.
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2014
End date of the intervention
2018
Present stage of the intervention
Please specify "other" stage of the intervention
Expected to be completed in 2018. But the seagrass will take at least a decade to fully grow (1).
Goals of the intervention
1. Consolidating and restoring aquatic habitat 1150* via the transplantation of submerged aquatic angiosperms;
2. Contributing to the achievement of good ecological status in transitional water bodies, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed measures in terms of meeting the objectives set by the Water Framework Directive (Dir. 2000/60/EC Article 4);
3. Quantifying and making good use of the ecosystem services provided by the lagoon environment (1).
Quantitative targets
Expected results of seagrass recolonization
- Following transplantation: 3,500 m2 of very sparse plant cover (only transplanted sods and rhizome grafts);
– 2 years after transplantation: 3,500 m2 with ca. 20% plant cover and new growing points in an area of ca. 14 ha;
– 4 years after transplantation: 3,500 m2 with ca. 80% plant cover and new growing points in an area of 140 ha;
– 10 years after transplantation: 25-30% of the intervention area colonized by aquatic angiosperms at varying levels of development.
– On small-mid term, this widespread seagrass meadows will form an ecological network with positive effects on the entire SIC. The biodiversity of Habitat 1150* will increase due to the re-colonization of autochthonous species with high ecological value (1).
Monitoring indicators defined
The monitoring indicators defined is the capacity of the plants to disperse their seeds and gradually cover the entire area under study over a period of 10 years. Applicants expect that after the intervention circa 25-30% of the area will be fully restored after 10 years and the situation will gradually improve (5 and 7).
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The proposed intervention technique involves transplanting a small number of plants, with advantages in terms of lower costs and impact on the donor sites. The technique is also suited to large-scale application. In support of the natural expansion of seagrass meadows in the surrounding areas, direct intervention is also planned for the entire duration of the project. The aim is to help the seeds take root and to facilitate the growth of new rhizomes produced by the transplanted specimens. Local fishermen (associated with the partners “Laguna Venexiana”) will carry out transplantations after specific training. 35 specific area of the Venice lagoon has been selected as optimal places for the introduction of the seagrass. Circa 400 transplants of plants will be done every year to cover the whole seagrass bed. The plants are ideal because they produce seeds that can be transported by currents and have a restorative impact on a large scale. The transplanting method does not require sophisticated equipment or too much effort (1 and 3).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Coastlines
Other
Please specify "other blue area"
Lagoon
Vegetation Type
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Coastal protection
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Researchers, university
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Università di Ca’Foscari di Venezia; Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA); Provveditorato Interregionale per le Opere Pubbliche; Laguna Venexiana Onlus. All these partners contributing financing the 25% of the project not financed by EU LIFE budget. They also contribute in the formation of the operators that worked on the transplants as well as the organization of conferences to provide information to the municipality and the public. It is in the interest of the Municipality of Venice and the local fishermen association taking part in the project to restore the habitat of the Northern Venice Lagoon (1).
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
EU body
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Business association or network
Researchers/university
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
It is a response of the Water Framework Directive and the Habitat Directive, which not only requires blue areas habitat degradation to be stopped, but also the implementation of restoration projects (1 and 5).
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
It is a response of the Water Framework Directive and the Habitat Directive, which not only requires blue areas habitat degradation to be stopped, but also the implementation of restoration projects. Therefore in a way it involves national regulations adapting and implementing EU regulations (1 and 5).
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Please specify other vegetation type
Seagrass
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
This specific NBS has been financed by 75% by the EU budget in the light of the LIFE project (2).
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
€ 1.173.000 (2)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify technological innovation
Restoration of the Venice Lagoon seabed with the reintroduction and monitoring of expansion of seagrass (1).
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
So far the project is ongoing, but seeing the successful results of the first years of the intervention, it is very likely this approach will be used in other coastal areas that might benefit from it.
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project completed the implementation in 2018, but as the seagrass needs time to grow, more of the impacts are expected. Below the expected results of seagrass recolonization are described:
- Following transplantation: 3,500 m2 of very sparse plant cover (only transplanted sods and rhizome grafts);
- 2 years after transplantation: 3,500 m2 with ca. 20% plant cover and new growing points in an area of ​​ca. 14 ha;
- 4 years after transplantation: 3,500 m2 with ca. 80% plant cover and new growing points in an area of ​​140 ha;
- 10 years after transplantation: 25-30% of the intervention area colonized by aquatic angiosperms at varying levels of development.
- On the small-mid term, this widespread seagrass meadows will form an ecological network with positive effects on the entire SIC. The biodiversity of Habitat 1150 * will increase due to the re-colonization of autochthonous species with high ecological value.

Already seen impacts are as follows:
- Sod growth after 8-9 months, Rhyzome growth after 6 months in comparison to the plants growth after 30 months.
- the intervention was successful in 33 out of the 35 selected areas; plants are spreading their seeds and new areas are being covered without the need for transplants; the environmental quality of the area has improved up to 4 classes of ecologic quality, shifting from poor environmental conditions to good (1, 6).
Economic impacts
Description of economic benefits
No mention of direct economic impact. But the project will help to restore the lagoon ecosystem, which will in the future protect the area from any kind of climate change or other damage costs. (1)
Description of social and cultural benefits
The project supports scientific studies and research and ran with the collaboration with The Ca'Foscari University of Italy. The final outcome of the project is planned to be presented to the general public, students and researchers. It is also planned to be presented in different national and international scientific events. (2)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Sod growth, Rhyzome growth, plants growth after 30 months, plants spreading their seeds, new areas being covered (6).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of October, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
Yes
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
1- Census of the plants to see if the transplant was effective.
2- Chemical and physical analysis of the water to assure biodiversity restoration and good health of the plants. This is done to make sure other algae and plants will have the appropriate microclimate to grow back in the area.
3- Quantification of ecosystem services: how the NBS can improve the socio-economic conditions of the lagoon. For example by providing an habitat for fish that local fishers can catch and sell/consume (1).
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
I could find reference to strategies to inform citizens (1), but not on involving them in the evaluation/assessment.
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Please specify
I could find reference to strategies to inform citizens (1), but not on involving them in the analysis of the evaluation/assessment.
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
No
Please specify
The project is still ongoing, a follow up will likely be available during monitoring after the intervention has ended.
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
Info on project partners, budget and financing. (296.44 KB) 296.44 KB
List of references
1. LIFE SEgrass RESTOration (SERESTO) Project Official webpage Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
2. Cartella stampa - press release.
3. Project flyer. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/FLYER_INGLESE-def-stampa-3-09.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
4. Project overview. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/brochure_seresto-per-sito.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
5. Project presentation. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Conf.-Int.-2_Sfriso_Descrizione-Progetto1.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
6. Project results/update. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Conf.-Int.-6_Sfriso_Monitoraggio-Piante1.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
7. Ecologic parameters. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Conf.-Int.-7_Bonometto_Monitoraggio-Ambiente1.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
8. Preliminary publication. Available at: http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/SER2014_O38_Facca.pdf. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
9. Venice as a smarter city. Available at: http://smarter-together.eu/cities/venice/. Accessed on 1st October, 2020.
10. Instituto Superior per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) (2018) Il trapianto di fanerogame acquatiche come misura per il ripristino delle lagune costiere: Resultati del progetto LIFE SERESTO. Available at: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2019/pubblicazioni/quaderni/Quad_RM_12_18_Fanerogame_acquatiche_SERESTO.pdf. Accessed on 16th October, 2020.
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Background:
1. Seagrass disappearance in choked transitional waters;
2. Loss of ecosystem services (nursery, protection against erosion, etc.
3. Loss of species of high ecological value in habitat 1150*

Seagrass (aquatic angiosperms or plants) meadows play a key role for coastal habitat conservation as they support several biological communities, birds included, stabilize the substrate (Quaderni Habitat n. 19 – Praterie a fanerogame marine) and sequestrate high amount of CO2.
In the last decades, seagrass meadows were strongly reduced in Venice lagoon and, in general, in the Mediterranean Sea due to several anthropogenic pressures. Recent regulations favored the reduction of the impacts, in particular, the nutrient discharges from the drainage basin (Decreti “Ronchi Costa”) and the clam catching (Prov. di Venezia, 1999). However, the limited hydrodynamism, that characterized coastal ponds and choked lagoons, hampers the seagrass natural recolonization due to the absence of plants producing seeds (1).
Public Images
Image
Seagrass at the Northern Lagoon of Venice
The project website
http://www.lifeseresto.eu/lifeseresto/gallery/