1. General information
2. Objectives of the intervention
3. NBS domains, ES and scale
4. Governance and financing
5. Evaluation and learning
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Actors involved in the assessment, monitoring or evaluation of NBS impacts
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Type of indicators
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Link to monitoring/evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Link to the output of assessments
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Community satisfaction
Description of locals satisfaction with the project
In 2021, a representative survey was conducted that included questions about the overall perception of the park. The results indicate a positive sentiment towards the park (Ref. 8):
40% positive perception
17 % negative perception
33 % Changed perception since corona pandemic
66 % no change
40% positive perception
17 % negative perception
33 % Changed perception since corona pandemic
66 % no change
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
No
Goal setting and impacts delivery
No, project goals were not set, and benefits were not delivered in all 3 key areas.
Reaching original project goals
Please specify the achievements of the project goals
Biodiversity:
--Increased ecological connectivity across regeneration sites and scales: "The park is part of Berlin's open space network, which extends from Tiergarten to Schöneberger Südgelände. It therefore makes a significant contribution to connecting habitats." (Ref. 1)
--Achieved increased conversion of degraded land or soil: "In its time as a wild wasteland, a unique ecological diversity has grown up at Gleisdreieck, which is also maintained and established in parts of today's park. " (Ref. 3)
--Achieved increased number of species present: "A total of over 950 trees and shrubs planted | 330 trees in the area
species already present, such as poplar, robinia, oak, Turkey oak,
hackberry, wild apple, pine, birch and rowan | 620 shrubs: typical
species of the railway wasteland such as lilac, buddleia, hawthorn, wild rose,
sowing lawn and dry grassland, sage flower meadow, shade, bee and butterfly borders, mixture for natural gravel areas" (Ref. 4)
Social justice and community:
Improve access to urban green space: "Today, the park allows many people to exercise and relax, but above all to experience urban nature and biodiversity day after day." (Ref. 1); "However, it is also important because there is a large deficit of green spaces in the neighbouring district of Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and in Schöneberg. The park is a huge gain in quality of life for the people living in these districts." (Ref. 4)
Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces: "However, this participation process was certainly a great benefit for the park. And the insights gained will help to successfully organise further public participation processes." (Ref. 4)
Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: "In the nature discovery area, children aged between 6 and 12 can also learn about animals and plants, play hide and seek or, in summer, splash around in the pools filled with water. And of course there are also playgrounds on the grounds waiting to be conquered by children of all ages." (Ref. 12)
Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure: "The design concept also ties in with the historical use of the site - attentive visitors will find traces of the past in the form of old railway tracks, signalling systems and buffer stops, especially in Ostpark and Dora-Duncker-Park." (Ref. 3); "Dense areas of wild growth and relics from the railway era have been preserved – e.g. railroad tracks, signalling systems, and buffer stops" (Ref. 13)
--Increased ecological connectivity across regeneration sites and scales: "The park is part of Berlin's open space network, which extends from Tiergarten to Schöneberger Südgelände. It therefore makes a significant contribution to connecting habitats." (Ref. 1)
--Achieved increased conversion of degraded land or soil: "In its time as a wild wasteland, a unique ecological diversity has grown up at Gleisdreieck, which is also maintained and established in parts of today's park. " (Ref. 3)
--Achieved increased number of species present: "A total of over 950 trees and shrubs planted | 330 trees in the area
species already present, such as poplar, robinia, oak, Turkey oak,
hackberry, wild apple, pine, birch and rowan | 620 shrubs: typical
species of the railway wasteland such as lilac, buddleia, hawthorn, wild rose,
sowing lawn and dry grassland, sage flower meadow, shade, bee and butterfly borders, mixture for natural gravel areas" (Ref. 4)
Social justice and community:
Improve access to urban green space: "Today, the park allows many people to exercise and relax, but above all to experience urban nature and biodiversity day after day." (Ref. 1); "However, it is also important because there is a large deficit of green spaces in the neighbouring district of Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and in Schöneberg. The park is a huge gain in quality of life for the people living in these districts." (Ref. 4)
Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces: "However, this participation process was certainly a great benefit for the park. And the insights gained will help to successfully organise further public participation processes." (Ref. 4)
Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: "In the nature discovery area, children aged between 6 and 12 can also learn about animals and plants, play hide and seek or, in summer, splash around in the pools filled with water. And of course there are also playgrounds on the grounds waiting to be conquered by children of all ages." (Ref. 12)
Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure: "The design concept also ties in with the historical use of the site - attentive visitors will find traces of the past in the form of old railway tracks, signalling systems and buffer stops, especially in Ostpark and Dora-Duncker-Park." (Ref. 3); "Dense areas of wild growth and relics from the railway era have been preserved – e.g. railroad tracks, signalling systems, and buffer stops" (Ref. 13)
Long-term perspective
Unknown: No information about the project's long-term sustainability.
Cost-effective solutions
Unknown
Equitable impacts
Transformative capacity
Magnitude of change
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
6. Sources
1.
Senate Department for Mobility, Transport, Climate Protection and Environment (n.d.). Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Grün Berlin (n.d.). Park am Gleisdreieck Development & participation. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
Park am Gleisdreieck (n.d.). Stadtnatur & Umweltbildung. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Senate Department for Urban Development and Environment (2013). Der Park am Gleisdreieck Idee, Geschichte, Entwicklung und Umsetzung. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Download];
5.
Grün Berlin (2015). Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Download];
6.
Potsdamer Platz (n.d.). Der Potsdamer Platz im Wandel der Zeit. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
7.
Grün Berlin (n.d.). Reallabor Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
8.
Berlin-Brandenburg Statistical Office (2024). Statistischer Bericht. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Download];
9.
District Office Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg of Berlin (n.d.). Zahlen und Fakten. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
10.
Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (2024). Bevölkerung der Bezirke in Berlin nach Migrationshintergrund im Jahr 2023. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
11.
VisitBerlin (n.d.). Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
12.
Cultural Heritage in Action (2022). Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on September 15, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
13.
INFO GmbH (2021). Besucher*innen-Zählung im Park am Gleisdreieck. Accessed on October 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Additional insights
The assessment report was written by Grün Berlin and featured work from university students, while the monitoring report was done by an external company about visitor numbers.
Public Images
Image
A forest grew among the vacant train tracks
Konstantin Börner
Image
The train tracks that give the park its name
Konstantin Börner

