1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Budapest
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
The creation of pocket parks is an urban initiative that has steadily grown throughout Budapest since 2010 (Reference 1). Most of these projects are citizen-led, but there is often support provided in the form of education and consultancy by initiatives such as the Contemporary Architecture Center (KÉK), or sometimes the local government (Reference 8). These spaces, typically covering an area of 1400 square meters only, are multi-functional and provide a space for small-scale food production, recreation, community sharing, and can be a fundamental element of neighbourhood rehabilitation. Moreover, it provides positive environmental effects such as water retention and the improvement of the area's micro-climate. Pocket-parks are critical in increasing the number of green areas in neighbourhoods that have limited space. (Reference 9)


Address

Hungary

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2010
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2011
End date of the intervention
ongoing
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The aim of pocket parks is to try and meet a variety of needs (References 1 and 5):
- small-scale food production;
- to improve the area's microclimate and air quality;
- mitigate extreme events such as floods or heavy precipitation;
- richer urban biodiversity;
- better air quality;
- to provide recreation such as bird watching, exercise;
- to provide a small community gathering space;
- enhancing public awareness of nature;
- providing health and recreational benefits;
- bringing together communities;
- facilitate cooperation between residents, municipalities and NGOs.
Quantitative targets
unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
There is no overall monitoring on how the city is delivering on its strategic objectives. [1]
Climate change mitigation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
In the past few years, more than two dozen community gardens have been established in Budapest. (Reference 1) The implementation was sometimes aided by the local government providing the land as well as maintenance resources such as the water supply and soil. In a short period of time, green areas, school squares or empty downtown dental homes were neglected in a residential area, where local and healthy vegetables, fruit production, recreation, and networking could be built into multi-functional community spaces. (Reference 2)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
House gardens
Parks and urban forests
Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
Community gardens and allotments
Community gardens
Please specify the number of plots or allotment gardens
Unknown
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Air quality regulation
Carbon storage/sequestration
Flood regulation
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Pocket parks and community gardens are mostly citizen led. There is support provided, in the form of education and consultancy, by initiatives such as the Contemporary Architecture Center (KÉK), that aims to increase the amount of pocket parks within Hungary. In some cases, the local government plays a role by providing the land as well as maintenance resources such as the water supply and soil. But, by and large, the movement is mostly self-organized. (Reference 1, 6, and 7)
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Land owners
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The National Environmental Programme is harmonised with the 7th Environment Action Programme of the European Union for the period until 2020 and the National Framework Strategy on Sustainable Development of Hungary approved by the Parliament. The Programme also serves as a basis for using the environmental funds of the EU for the 2014-2020 period. (Reference 3)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
Since 1997, the comprehensive framework for environmental objectives and measures in Hungary has been represented by the National Environmental Programme. The Programme aims at defining environmental goals and the relevant tasks and tools for Hungary, while considering national conditions, long term social interests and future development targets and commitments related to global responsibilities, international co-operations and Hungary's EU membership.Two initiatives are currently under way that will likely be relevant drivers of NBS adoption in the future: Hungary's contribution to the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES), and a national Green Infrastructure exercise, which will be finalised by 2020 (supported by the Environmental Operational Programme). (Reference 1 and 3)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The Budapest 2030 Long-Term Urban Development Concept. This strategic document aims to protect and increase green areas, so as to ensure ecological connectivity and develop walking and cycling corridors. It also promotes greater investment in brownfield sites, the prevention of urban sprawl, and 'smart' city development. (Reference 1)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Please specify other type of voluntary intervention
Pocket parks are largely initiated by citizens of their own accord. (Reference 1)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
To address challenges related to urbanism, Budapest has drafted some strategic documents (Reference 1):
- The Integrated Urban Development Strategy 2020. This strategy prioritizes making Budapest a livable and environmentally-conscious city.
- The Budapest Green Infrastructure Strategy (under development). The Green Infrastructure Strategy aims to compile an inventory of green infrastructure, draw conclusions on previous investments, and identify development objectives and areas for action. The strategy will seek to promote biodiversity and connectivity; adapt to climate change; increase the quality of social and health conditions; and improve the economic and tourism potential of the city.
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The initiative "Community Garden Nights" was launched by the pocket park called Grundk3rt. It is a collaboration of more than 10 community gardens, namely, Aranykatica Garden, Garden of Békés, Garden of Life Garden, Garden of Forestry, Focus Group of Women, Grundk3rt, Garden of Limit Garden, Kisdió Garden, Lőrinci Herter, Civic Guard Community Garden, and Zug Garden. The aim is to raise awareness of the values ​​of community gardens - from eco-conscious thinking to health and recreation to community building. Additionally, the Contemporary Architecture Center (KÉK) has been engaged in the naturalization and distribution of community gardens in Budapest since 2010. Their organization and website provides a platform where community gardens and their gardeners and people curious about the topic could find each other and become participants of a bigger community. (Reference 2 and 6)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The FP7 projects FASUDIR and ARTS have provided valuable lessons on how to involve city authorities in urban sustainability processes. In the FASUDIR project, city authorities were involved in developing a new software tool for city-level modelling. The ARTS project showed the importance of building alliances through coupling mechanisms that involved different stakeholders. This connected municipal authorities and civil society organisations. The project also brought to light the need for transparency in planning, decision-making, and programme implementation. Overall, ARTS stressed the importance of building trust and capacity, and the integration of local knowledge into decision-making. (Reference 1)
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Due to the large structure of Budapest's administration, city districts apply separately for EU funds relating to NBS. For example, the Hegyvidék district applied for the Interreg project European Cooperation for urban green spaces, while the Zugló district applied for ERDF funding for innovative urban strategies and action plans. In 2014, over 95% of all public investments in Hungary were co-financed by the EU, so adequate financing mechanisms that specifically mention NBS are one of the main drivers (alongside domestic political will) for project development. The Contemporary Architecture Centre (KÉK) also supports the development of the pocket parks and community gardens within Hungary with education, consultancy and creation of a knowledge base. Since 2010 it has facilitated the initiative to become a self-organizing movement by creating sample gardens. (Reference 1 and 6)

Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
unknown
Please specify cost savings
unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
unknown
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
The existence of pocket parks trigger processes of urban regeneration. It is a dynamic place, multi-functional space where quality of life can be improved for its users. They are places designed to for people to get together and to know the other's culture, where the confrontation between people is based on common space sharing. Pocket Parks can make up for the emptiness, abandonment and no function of many spaces that are located within cities, triggering processes of urban regeneration through the discovery of a new "life" and a new potentiality to accommodate. The existence of pocket parks are a form of innovative city rehabilitation tool whereby the act of cultivation is done by a self-organized group with common goals such as community building, healthy life and living, and revival of urban vacant lots. The use of pocket parks brings forth the collective creativity of a community to realize their common goal. [3][7]
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The network of pocket parks within the city are characterized by the spirit of community and sharing of ideas. Members of pocket parks in different districts in Budapest often come together to organize events, network, and learn from each other's experiences in urban gardening. There are initiatives such as the Contemporary Architecture Centre (KÉK) whose aim is to increase the network of pocket parks in Hungary and provide support tools for communities interested in starting their own pocket park and/or urban garden. [2][3][6]
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The creation of more pocket parks is in the Budapest 2030 Long Term Urban Development Concept. The document mentions the limited open space within the city. It, therefore, calls upon alternative methods to increase biologically active spaces, one of which are pocket parks. This means the creation of more pocket parks throughout time will be an increasing priority to be able to realize Budapest's long term goals for urban planning. [4]
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The environmental impacts of the NBS are difficult to assess because the NBS consists of many independent pocket parks. However, there have been studies (Reference 3, 5 and 7) that have proven that in general, pocket parks cities reduce risks of climate hazards such as extreme heat and storms and contribute to better air quality. The intervention also reduces the heat-island effect. (Reference 10) Small-scale food production contributes to sustainable production and consumption, and pocket parks create richer biodiversity by providing green habitats in urban areas. (Reference 1)
Economic impacts
Please specify other socio-cultural impact
Facilitate co-operation between citizens and the local government
Description of economic benefits
unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
“These gardens and small parks have clear social impacts by bringing together communities, enhancing public awareness of nature, and providing health and recreational benefits. They also facilitate cooperation between residents, municipalities and NGOs.” (Reference 1) The projects make healthy, local food more available. (Reference 2) KÉK, the NGO that provides support to these initiative says that “ we make concepts like "urban heat islands" and "decrease of biological footprint" more comprehensible for everyone”. The projects have raised awareness of environmental issues. (Reference 1) The green space created and the gardening activities also have a positive effect on the mental health of citizens. (Reference 7) And a larger amount of green spaces for food production and recreation are more available.
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown (in July 2020).
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Budapest - NBS for climate resilience and pollution control (n.d.). Oppla. Available at: https://www.oppla.eu/node/18003 [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
2. Tart Kapukkal Varnak a Kozossegi Kertek! [The Community Questions Will Be Taken by the Killer! Blog Entry 08/04/2016]. GrundK3rt - Community Garden on Apáthy István street. Available at: https://grundkert.blog.hu/ [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
3. Francesco, A. (2017) Pocket Park: Product Urban design, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, S1869-S1878, Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352705 [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
4. Sandor, F. (2013). The Budapest 2030 Long-Term Urban Development Concept Prepared: on behalf of the Urban Development Department of the Municipality of Budapest Mayor’s Office. Available at: http://budapest.hu/Documents/V%C3%A1ros%C3%A9p%C3%ADt%C3%A9si%20F%C5%91oszt%C3%A1ly/Budapest2030_ENG_summary.pdf [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
5. Blake, A. (2013). Pocket parks. University of Washington. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/open2100/pdf/2_OpenSpaceTypes/Open_Space_Types/pocket_parks.pdf [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
6. Community Gardens and KÉK (n.d.). kozossegi kertek. [online] Available at: http://kozossegikertek.hu/en/angol-oldal-1/ [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
7. Bende, C. and Nagy, G. (2016). Effects of community gardens on local society: the case of two community gardens in Szeged. Available at: http://www.belvedere-meridionale.hu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/07_Bende-Nagy_2016_03.pdf [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
8. Zacharias, M. et al. (n.d.). Sustainable community gardening in cities. Hortis – Horticulture in towns for inclusion and socialisation (n. 526476-LLP-1-2012-1-IT-GRUNDTVIG-GMP). Available at: https://www.academia.edu/26096609/Sustainable_Community_Gardening_in_Cities [Accessed: 19 Jun. 2020]
9. Marton Kallai - Urban Nature - Community Gardens in Budapest (2016). Maimano. [link unavailable in 2020]
10. Gpean.org. (2018). Budapest - NBS for climate resilience and pollution control. [online] Available at: http://www.gpean.org/project/bp/297 [Accessed: 18 Jul. 2020]