1. General information
2. Objectives of the intervention
3. NBS domains, ES and scale
4. Governance and financing
5. Evaluation and learning
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Transparency
Please specify other means of ensuring transparency
Online disclosure of activities (3)
Community satisfaction
Description of locals satisfaction with the project
Few feedbacks are found as it has been recently inaugurated. On the one hand, they are positive, highlighting the ease of access to green spaces.
However, it is mentioned that at the beginning the community did not support the project (the reasons are not specified), but that for now, locals regularly use the facilities (1)
However, it is mentioned that at the beginning the community did not support the project (the reasons are not specified), but that for now, locals regularly use the facilities (1)
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Please specify Trade-offs & Negative impacts Selected
The households encircling Gothatuwa Park were not initially supportive of the project, and grievances could emerge again. But for now, locals are using the facilities to walk and practice sports (1)
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
No
Goal setting and impacts delivery
In the planning phase, the project aimed to address issues in all 3 key priority areas, but impacts were not delivered in all three key areas.
Reaching original project goals
Long-term perspective
Yes
Cost-effective solutions
Unknown
Equitable impacts
Transformative capacity
Magnitude of change
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
6. Sources
1.
Bove, T. (2024). Once used as trash dumps, Sri Lanka’s wetlands are remade as flood-buffering parks. Accessed on October 11, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Daily News (2024). Colombo’s Hidden Oasis. Accessed on October 11, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
Gothatuwa Wetland Park (2023). Gothatuwa Wetland Park Facebook Page. Accessed on October 11, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
International Water Management Institute (2024). Urban wetlands and the built environment: how Colombo’s green spaces enhance city life. Accessed on October 11, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
5.
Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Economic Affairs, Livestock Development, Irrigation and Fisheries & Aquatic Resources Development (2019). Strategic Social Assessment . Accessed on October 11, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Public Images
Image
Gothatuwa Wetland Park
Kasun Bandara Hettinayaka
Image
Dragonfly at the Gothatuwa Wetland Park
Gothatuwa Wetland Park Facebook Page

