1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Ipoh
Region
Asia
Native title of the NBS intervention
Engineering with nature in the Upper Kinta River Basin
Short description of the intervention
The Upper Kinta River Basin covers an area of about 31,470 hectares above Ipoh City, and it is the main water catchment resource for the residents of the city and its surrounding areas. The Kinta river basin is now threatened by land erosion, land development, improper sewage treatment and irresponsible waste discharges (Ref 1). In 2021, a pilot project was implemented near the city of Ipoh along the SimpangPulai Highway and experimented with river bio-engineering techniques to reduce soil erosion and subsequently prevent sedimentation downstream (Ref 3). The pilot site was established as part of the Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into River Management project, which focused on applying nature-based solutions for mainstreaming biodiversity into riverine landscape planning and watershed management in Malaysia. To provide seedlings for the bio-engineering project and also other related initiatives, a nursery was established in the indigenous Pawong Orang Asli Village. The nursery also provided additional income for communities (Ref 4). The pilot was developed with the expectation to be upscaled and replicated in other parts of the UKB, especially along the SimpangPulai Highway. (Ref. 6)
Address

Malaysia

Area boundary
POINT (101.34488 4.6011)
POINT (101.35547 4.56152)
POINT (101.31976 4.58787)
POINT (101.2408 4.60909)
POINT (101.19531 4.58359)
POINT (101.15807 4.65666)
POINT (101.15747 4.6688)
POINT (101.16436 4.72495)
POINT (101.24938 4.71998)
POINT (101.35032 4.66418)
POINT (101.37658 4.63031)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Bio-engineering Pilot Site at Section 45.9 FT185 Simpang Pulai Highway, image retrieved from http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/view_file.cfm?fileid=209 (accessed 18-1-2023)
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Tropical rainforest and river
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2016
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2021
End date of the intervention
2022
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The objectives of the projects were:
1. to establish a demonstration site to promote the integration of riverine biodiversity conservation into river management;
2. to reduce soil erosion and sediment loading from the SimpangPulai Highway;
3. to engage and empower the Orang Asli indigenous communities via livelihood creation;
4. to enhance institutional and technical capacity for riverine biodiversity conservation among key stakeholders (Ref 2, 4, 6, 8).
Quantitative targets
(i) At least 1 pilot site established and demonstrated using bioengineering techniques.
(ii) 5 communities actively monitoring on quarterly basis. (Ref. 8)
Monitoring indicators defined
number of pilot sites created
number of communities involved in monitoring (Ref. 8)
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The pilot bio-engineering site was implemented at Section 45.9 FT185 Simpang Pulai Highway (near the city of Ipoh). The slope restoration was implemented through the combination of plant attributions (plant species suitable in slope stabilisation: Melastoma malabathricum, Millenia suffructicosa, Artocarpus odoratissimus, bamboo, vetiver) and composition designs (bio-engineering initiative). Applied techniques included trench for drainage, silt traps for sediment monitoring, coconut coir mat and planting of species suitable for slope stabilisation.
A nursery for bamboo and other relevant plants for mitigating soil erosion was created at Orang Asli Kampung Pawong Village. The Orang Asli (indigenous) community members were trained and employed in the bio-engineering work supporting slope erosion mitigation and control in the selected portion of the upper catchment.
Project results suggested the effective combination of plant attributions and composition designs can be a way forward in slope restoration in highland areas.
(Ref. 2,4,6, 8 and 9)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Vegetation Type
Please specify "other marginalized group"
indigenous people
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Other
Please specify other non-government actors involved
International organizations
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The bio-engineering pilot project was a collaborative effort between the Ministry of Environment and Water and the Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and two NGO partners (the Global Environment Centre and Forever Sabah). The work also actively involved the Orang Asli indigenous communities in the implementation and monitoring of the project (Ref.2)
Key actors - initiating organization
Please specify other Key actors - Other stakeholders involved
indigenous communities
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Multilateral organisation
Please specify other land owner
indigenous communities
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
15-year Central Forest Spine Master Plan (included in the 10th, 11th and 12th five-year Malaysia Plans). (1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
A specific chapter on the Biodiversity Management Strategy in the UKB has been incorporated into the UKB Management Strategy, and bioengineering approaches were showcased by the demonstration activity undertaken in partnership with the Department of Public Works, which was one of the first activities undertaken in Malaysia to stabilize fill slopes (i.e. those below the highway cut mainly formed from soil cut from the upper slopes). (Ref. 8)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
UKB Management Strategy: The implementation of this pilot project was put forward by the integrated management strategy of the Upper Kinta River Basin (UKB) project, which aims to conserve and preserve the habitats of forest and river at upstream of Kinta River Basin to protect the ecosystem and secure water resources (Ref 1, 5).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
A Project Working Group (PWG) has been established with members from 29 stakeholder (state level, city level, district level). (8)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Leading up the development of the UKB Management Strategy, a UKB riverine biodiversity study was conducted: 101 families and 567 species of flora; 8 families and 18 species of fish; 8 families and 24 species of dragonflies; 46 families and 132 species of birds; and 12 species of mammals including Malayan Tiger and Black Panther (Ref 6).
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
A GEF project grant was provided to the Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into River Management project. (2)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
For the three pilot component of the Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into River Management project the total provisioned financing was USD 7,230,000 (USD 950,000 GEF funding and USD 6,280,000 co-financing). However, the exact financing for this specific pilot is unknown. (Ref. 3)
Please specify other source of funding
Yayasan Hasanah, sovereign wealth fund of Malaysia
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify technological innovation
The bioengineering process was suggested to be innovative: "With the right combination of plants that are fast-growing and have extensive root systems, we can accelerate the process of plant succession, enhancing biodiversity and consequently improving the hydrological and mechanical aspects of the soil. …The outcome shows the success where the plots are covered by vegetation with time, and the plots are more stable now.” (Ref. 2)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The pilot slope bio-engineering initiative in UKB catchment area was developed with the expectation to be upscaled and replicated in other parts of the UKB, especially along the SimpangPulai Highway to reduce erosion impacts towards water supply and aquatic biodiversity. (Ref. 6)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters: The outcomes of the pilot shows success where the plots are covered by vegetation with time, and the plots are more stable now (against landslides) (Ref. 2)

Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems: An expected pilot project outcome was enhanced protection of the upper Kinta catchment and riverine habitat. (Ref. 3)

Improved soil/Reduced biodiversity loss: The pilot project confirmed that with the right combination of fast-growing plants with extensive root systems, we can accelerate the process of plant succession, enhancing biodiversity and consequently improving the hydrological and mechanical aspects of the soil. (Ref. 2) The project also undertook a riverine biodiversity study which found the source of Sg Kinta in Gunung Pass and recorded 101 families and 567 species of flora; 8 families and 18 species of fish; 8 families and 24 species of dragonflies; 46 families and 132 species of birds; and 12 species of mammals including Malayan Tiger and Black Panther. (Ref. 6,7)

Increased conversion of degraded land/Restoration of ecosystems: An expected pilot project outcome was improved erosion control measures through community-based forest rehabilitation (Ref. 3) The bio-engineering initiative successfully demonstrated an effective combination of plant attributions and composition designs as a way forward in slope restoration in highland areas. (Ref. 6)

Promotion of naturalistic landscape design: An expected pilot project outcome was (landslide) threat reduction through the introduction of alternative land development approaches (Ref. 3)

Improved water quality/ Increased protection of threatened species: The pilot project was expected to improve river water quality and riverine habitat and status of threatened species (Ref. 3)

Description of economic benefits
Increase of jobs: Orang Asli community members were trained and employed in the bio-engineering work supporting slope erosion mitigation and control in the selected portion of the upper catchment. (Ref. 2)
Description of social and cultural benefits
Fair distribution of benefits/Increased visibility for marginalized people: Local Orang Asli indigenous community members were trained and employed in the bio-engineering work supporting slope erosion mitigation and control in the selected portion of the upper catchment. (Ref. 2)

Increased involvement of locals: This work has involved a range of local stakeholders with an emphasis on engaging and empowering Orang Asli indigenous communities. (Ref. 2) The UKB
project showed that continuously consulting and engaging key stakeholders can promote as well as expand soil bioengineering at other sites. (Ref. 6)

Increased support to research: The project also produced a UKB riverine biodiversity study which found the source of Sg Kinta in Gunung Pass and recorded 101 families and 567 species of flora; 8 families and 18 species of fish; 8 families and 24 species of dragonflies; 46 families and 132 species of birds; and 12 species of mammals including Malayan Tiger and Black Panther. (Ref. 6,7)

Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits: The project actively improved environmental awareness and river pollution monitoring (Ref. 2)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Covid-19 pandemic prompted overhauls in the way the project operated and engaged; the working group had to conduct empowerment and engagement activities through small-scale, localised and online events.

Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Visual monitoring
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
ukbmas_final_december_2020_compressed.pdf (4.13 MB) 4.13 MB
List of references
1. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2023), Integrated Management of Kinta River Basin for Community & Ecosystem Services through Active Community and Stakeholder Participation, available at 2023 https://www.gec.org.my/index.cfm?&menuid=423 (accessed 18 January 2023)

2. UNDP Ecosystems & Biodiversity (2022), Engineering with nature Rain, landslides, floods – nature-based solutions prevent soil erosion and protect people in Perak, Malaysia, available at https://undp-biodiversity.exposure.co/engineering-with-nature (accessed 18 January 2023)

3. Mainstreaming of Biodiversity Conservation into River Management (n.d.) MSP Project document Available at: https://www.thegef.org/projects-operations/projects/5692 (accessed 16 April 2023)

4. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2023), MAINSTREAMING OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION INTO RIVER MANAGEMENT - Output 2: Best Management Practices for Critical Riverine Habitats are demonstrated at Key Sites of National Importance: UPPER KINTA BASIN, available at http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/index.cfm?&menuid=39 (accessed 18 January 2023)

5. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2020), Upper Kinta Basin Management Strategy (UKBMaS), available at http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/view_file.cfm?fileid=99 (accessed 18 January 2023)

6. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2022), Proceedings of Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into River Management in Malaysia Symposium, available at http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/view_file.cfm?fileid=408 (accessed 18 January 2023)

7. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2020), UKB Riverine Biodiversity Study, available at http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/index.cfm?&menuid=27 (accessed 18 January 2023)

8. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2022), Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation into River Management” Project - Terminal evaluation, available at: https://erc.undp.org/evaluation/evaluations/detail/13347?tab=documents (accessed 16 April 2023)

9. Global Environment Centre (GEC) (2023) Pilot Bioengineering Demonstration Site. Available at: http://www.riverranger.my/RiverineBioD/index.cfm?&menuid=43 (accessed 16 April 2023)
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Bio-engineering demonstration site at Section 45.9 FT185 Simpang Pulai Highway
Bio-engineering demonstration site at Section 45.9 FT185 Simpang Pulai Highway
Department of Irrigation and Drainage and the Global Environment Centre
Image
UKB
UKB
Global Environment Centre (GEC)
Image
Orang Asli Communities
Orang Asli Communities
United Nations
Image
Orang Asli Kampung Pawong Village
Orang Asli Kampung Pawong Village
United Nations