1. General information
2. Objectives of the intervention
3. NBS domains, ES and scale
4. Governance and financing
5. Evaluation and learning
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Actors involved in the assessment, monitoring or evaluation of NBS impacts
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Type of indicators
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Link to monitoring/evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Transparency
Community satisfaction
Description of locals satisfaction with the project
There is positive feedback on how the area has been improved. The ease with which neighbours can move around in a car-free space and the perceived safety is highlighted.
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
Yes
Goal setting and impacts delivery
No, although benefits were delivered in all the 3 key areas, but in the planning phase, the project did not aim to address issues in all the 3 key priority areas.
Reaching original project goals
Long-term perspective
Yes
Cost-effective solutions
Unknown
Equitable impacts
Transformative capacity
Magnitude of change
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
6. Sources
1.
Muñóz, J., Giraldo, X., Garaycochea, M., Vega, C. (2021). Recuperación de espacios verdes en Lima. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Peru Green Building Council (n.d.). Programa Limeños al Bicentenario. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
Urban Shift (2023). Ampliación participativa y de bajo coste de las zonas verdes públicas de Lima. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Municipalidad de Lima (n.d.). Limeños al Bicentenario. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
5.
Sistema Urbano (2023). Ciudades para las Infancias Consideraciones para el diseño del entorno urbano para niñas y niños. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
6.
Ser Peruano (2021). Día Mundial de la Tierra: Recuperado Pasaje Paiva ahora cuenta con Árboles, Plantas y Biohuertos. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
7.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (2020). Planos Estratificados de Lima Metropolitana a Nivel de Manzanas 2020. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
8.
REUNIS - Repositorio Único Nacional de Información en Salud (2024). Estadística Poblacional. Accessed on September 3, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Additional insights
The Limeños al Bicentenario programme is linked to the achievement of the green public spaces goals of Lima's climate action plan and is a leading example of street and public space improvement in Latin America (3).
The program prioritizes spaces for improvement using a points-based framework that considers the following factors (3):
Vulnerability: Areas with high physical or social vulnerability, including a lack of vegetation, deteriorated conditions, and potential for misuse. Social vulnerability factors encompass insecurity, violence, and the presence of vulnerable populations.
Amenity: Public spaces lacking adequate access, facilities for young children and vulnerable groups, street furniture, and green infrastructure to protect against heat, noise, and pollution.
Citizen participation: The involvement of community leaders and residents willing to contribute to the development and maintenance of their local project.
Tactical urbanism opportunities: Spaces where innovative solutions can be tested to yield significant economic, environmental, and social benefits.
Catalyst potential: Areas with high potential to foster social cohesion, local economic development, improved well-being, and essential community services.
Convergence spaces: Public spaces that serve as gathering points, landmarks, high-traffic areas, or places of symbolic significance.
The program prioritizes spaces for improvement using a points-based framework that considers the following factors (3):
Vulnerability: Areas with high physical or social vulnerability, including a lack of vegetation, deteriorated conditions, and potential for misuse. Social vulnerability factors encompass insecurity, violence, and the presence of vulnerable populations.
Amenity: Public spaces lacking adequate access, facilities for young children and vulnerable groups, street furniture, and green infrastructure to protect against heat, noise, and pollution.
Citizen participation: The involvement of community leaders and residents willing to contribute to the development and maintenance of their local project.
Tactical urbanism opportunities: Spaces where innovative solutions can be tested to yield significant economic, environmental, and social benefits.
Catalyst potential: Areas with high potential to foster social cohesion, local economic development, improved well-being, and essential community services.
Convergence spaces: Public spaces that serve as gathering points, landmarks, high-traffic areas, or places of symbolic significance.
Public Images
Image
Teniente Paiva passage
Lima's Municipality
Image
View of the renovated street in the Teniente Paiva passage.
Lima's Municipality

