1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Liverpool
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
The River Alt Restoration Project at Stonebridge started in 2013 with an initial goal to remove culverts in order to create re-naturalised watercourses and maintain watercourses easier. It also involved the removal of rubbish and other obstructions to reduce the risk of flooding in the wider catchment (Reference 2). The project then evolved with a bigger goal to divert River Alt into a new 900-meter long linear park named Alt Meadows. Relevant engineering works were employed in the area. In addition, accessible paths and meadow, wetland and woodland habitats were created. The park was also linked into surrounding areas (like housing, shops, schools, etc.). The project benefits include the expected increase in wildlife biodiversity and improved water quality and flood protection (Reference 1, 3).
The project was led The Cass Foundation, in partnership with the Community Forest Trust, with funding from DEFRA’s Catchment Restoration Fund (via Environmental Agency) and Liverpool City Council. The Foundation remains responsible for maintaining Alt Meadows on behalf of the city council (Reference 3).
Address

liverpool
United Kingdom

Total area
82000.00m²
NBS area
82000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
River with culvert
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2012
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2013
End date of the intervention
2015
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The project aimed to create a new public open green space and opening up the River Alt. Issues that project aimed to address are (reference 1):
 Poor river morphology;
 High flood risk within extensive built-up areas and agricultural land;
 Fly-tipping and debris removal causes an ongoing maintenance issue and a risk to the blockage and failure of culverted river sections;
 Presence of invasive species including Japanese Knotweed and Himalayan Balsam;
 A closed, man-made, culvert river section creating a poor environment for biodiversity;
 Isolated green spaces and poor habitat connectivity;
 The need for meaningful engagement with the community;
 Derelict, underused, neglected and brownfield land blighting a deprived area of the city.
Quantitative targets
1. 870m long channel will be excavated with a 3.5 wide, low flow, channel, a series of floodplain benches or ledges. (Reference 1)
2. 3 ha of native grassland and wildflower meadow will be planted on low fertility substrates, used to enhance the species diversity. (Reference 1)
3. 4m wide path network (DDA compliant) from the site going close to the riverside within the upper floodplain (Reference 1)
4. 0.4 ha of willow scrub planting and semi natural grassland which will provide cover for nesting birds, small mammals and potential habitat for water voles and kingfisher known to be present locally along the River Alt (reference 1)
Monitoring indicators defined
1. increase in flood storage capacity within the river corridor (Reference 1)
2. A small area of Japanese Knot weed will be eradicated and monitored prior to the excavation of the new river channel. (Reference 1)
3. Himalayan Balsam located upstream will be monitored and managed (Reference 1)
4. Hydrological performance of the new water course (Reference 3)

Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
1- Channel excavation was done to help minimize erosion and enhance habitat diversity, significant increase in flood storage capacity within the river corridor and reduction of flood risk elsewhere in the catchment. (Reference 1)
2 . A mosaic of habitats was created including extensive planting of the riparian and marginal wetland (Reference 1)
3. Invasive weed species were managed (Reference 1)
4. Access for easy maintenance of the watercourse, including vegetation was provided (Reference 1)
5. Engagement activities like public consultation, 'walk and talk' sessions and conservation volunteering and training among many others were conducted (Reference 1)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Green corridors and green belts
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Green areas for water management
Sustainable urban drainage systems
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
walking and cycling routes
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Please specify other local relevant strategy
River Basin Management Plan, the City’s Green Infrastructure Strategy and Flood Risk Management Plan
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Researchers, university
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The Cass Foundation led and managed the project. It remains responsible for maintaining the built riverside park, Alt Meadows (Reference 1, 3)
There is a partnership with Community Forest Trust, with funding from DEFRA's Catchment Restoration Fund (via the Environment Agency) and Liverpool City Council.
Staff and students from the University of Liverpool, Professor Janet Hooke, are involved in monitoring and studying the success of the project.
Local people/ community are involved in volunteering activities.
Lancashire Wildlife Trust has the role of a maintenance contractor.
(Reference 3)
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Private foundation/trust
Researchers/university
Citizens or community group
Land owners
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
The project was implemented to support the delivery of improved water quality to meet the objectives under the EU Water Quality Framework Directive (Reference 2)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
It will contribute to several Liverpool and Environment Agency strategic priorities and plan: River Basin Management Plan (Reference 1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The River Alt Restoration Project will contribute to several Liverpool and Environment Agency strategic priorities and plans including the River Basin Management Plan, the City’s Green Infrastructure Strategy and Flood Risk Management Plan. The site is also located within one of the City’s priority Strategic Investment Areas (Reference 1).
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Mandatory (based on policy)
Intervention is mandatory
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The City council’s Green Infrastructure Strategy and Flood Risk Management Plan is mentioned (Reference 2)
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Catchment Restoration Fund: from Environment Agency is the main source of investment (Reference 2)
The Cass Foundation is a charity that works with individuals, organisations and communities to research, collaborate on, promote and deliver projects that focus on health and the environment which is offering (Reference 4)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Total funding of £1.5 million(1.71M Euros). £970k(1.1M Euros) funding came from Department of Food and Rural Affairs, through the Environment Agency’s Catchment Restoration Fund. (reference 1)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
A section of heavily engineered river, to be de-culverted for realigning the River Alt between East Lancashire Road and Parkstile Lane, into a new meandering, naturalistic, open river channel with newly vegetated river banks. (ref 1)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
-Improved biodiversity – the creation of a mosaic of new habitats to create an attractive, biodiverse landscape are beneficial to protected species found locally within the river catchment e.g. water vole and kingfisher (Reference 1). Wildlife along the river valley has continued to diversify, with increasing amounts and species of bird and insect life. Kingfishers and visiting Little Egret are regularly seen, and waterfowl have bred successfully on the site (Reference 3).
-Improved water quality brought about by aeration and increased light penetration of the river within the new channel
-The regeneration of 8.2ha of brownfield land creates new habitats, public greenspace and an open, more naturalistic, river corridor.
-Removal and management of invasive vegetation (ex: Japanese Knotweed, Himalayan Balsam)
- Increased flood storage capacity within the river corridor and reduced flood risk.
- River Alt riverbank has been converted into a new 900-metre long linear park. (reference 3).
Description of economic benefits
Major regeneration project within the Alt Valley corridor has the potential to catalyze economic investment. (Reference 1) The design provides a high quality setting for existing and future developments. (Reference 3).
Description of social and cultural benefits
-Compliance of the built path network to the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) provides fair access to the green space.
-Improved quality of local people’s lives, creation educational and recreational opportunities, delivery of health and wellbeing benefits through encouraging outdoor exercise and connecting people to nature. Improved sense of community, cohesion and responsibility.
- Community involvement has been integral to the project and over 2,000 trees, 4,000 shrubs and 2,100 wetland plants have been planted by volunteers and the contractor (reference 3).
- 1400 people have attended events and activities and 300+ volunteers have supported the project
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Lenght of the linear park (900-metre long);
Number of people who have attended events and activities (1400 people);
Number of volunteers have supported the project (300+) (reference 3).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
No information was found regarding Covid-19 impact on the project area.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
List of references
1. The Cass Foundation. (2013). CRF project Briefing Note River Alt. Available at: https://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/crf034_project_briefing_note_-_river_alt_draft.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2020.
2. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2015). Catchment Restoration Fund: Environment Agency Final Annual Report 2014-2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/catchment-restoration-fund-environment-agency-summary-report-2014-to-2015. Accessed 16 July 2020.
3. The Cass Foundation. (no date). Alt Meadows. Available at: Available at: http://www.cassfoundation.org.uk/alt-meadows/4565276800. Accessed 16 July 2020.
4. The Cass Foundation (no date). About us. Available at: http://www.cassfoundation.org.uk/about-us/4564796823. Accessed 16 July 2020.
Attachments
Attachment Size
River Alt Restoration Project Details by The Cass Foundation (509.04 KB) 509.04 KB
Information on CRF Funding (780.54 KB) 780.54 KB
Additional comments
Staff and students from the University of Liverpool, led by Professor Janet Hooke, were involved in monitoring and studying the success of the project but no formal reporting could found for reference.
Comments and notes
Comments
A well documented case due to multiple partners present in the project.

No information was found on monitoring and evaluation reports.