1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Ljubljana
Region
Europe
Short description of the intervention
The intervention involves the transformation of a long-time fenced construction site, which was underdeveloped since 2011. The municipality, which owns the site, first agreed to support the cultural association KUD Obrat and their project idea with a lease for a month-long use, but later it prolonged its support based on local community’s response to the intervention. The place became a community space while the project enhances and promotes the possibilities for urban gardening as well as a more active inclusion of the inhabitants in decision-making regarding planning, development and management of the city (1).
Address

Resljeva cesta 32-34
1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia

Total area
650.00m²
NBS area
650.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
Fenced construction site (1)
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2010
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2010
End date of the intervention
2011
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
Use of a long time closed construction site in the city centre for the development of communal gardens, education and recreation. (1)
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
Unknown
Implementation activities
With the permission of the Municipality of Ljubljana, the site opened for temporary use for the duration of Bunker’s Garden By the Way programme (the second half of August 2010). A gate was installed to allow access to the land, the site was cleaned, learning about and preserving the trees and wild plants that had taken root there and carting in the first cubic meters of soil were done. The spring of 2011 brought new energy to the project when local residents responded to our invitation to “Make Your Own Garden”. The invitation anticipated the desire for small-plot gardening based on the rich local tradition of that practice. More than twenty people came to the meeting and that very day began enthusiastically setting up their vegetable beds. Thus the project got started and the gardening is still continuing. (1, 2 and 3)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Community gardens and allotments
Allotments
Community gardens
Please specify the number of plots or allotment gardens
40
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
A place for social gathering and agricultural education (1 and 3)
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Inspiration for culture, art and design
Recreation
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Citizens or community groups
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
KUD Obrat (an association of citizens) started the initiatie and gained permission of the city to continue it as it is on the community owned land (1)
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Land owners
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Please specify
unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
It did not incur costs
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify social innovation
The project led to communal decission making and joint work of various social groups including disadvantaged groups such as immigrants. (Poljak Istenič, 2016) (3)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
It's a first such communal gardening attempt in Ljubljana and boasts inclusion of disadvantaged groups, making it innovative, although the documents do not mention if it borrows from existing examples in other countries (1, 2 and 3)
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
In 2013, Botanical Garden started forming communal gardens next to the railway tracks, as part of an activitiy of weeding out invasive species from their land. (1)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
1. The site has increased the total number of green spaces within the city.
2. With the existing plants and the newly planted vegetable and other gardening plants it hosts a variety of species in a very small area.
3. The project has converted a previous waste site into a green space and helped in protecting and restoring nature in the area. (1 and 3)
Description of economic benefits
1. Local residents can get plots and produce food. (1)
Description of social and cultural benefits
1. The project provides education about urban gardening and ecology, also about sharing the management of a space and its processual and participatory organization.
2. Kud Obrat is also publishing texts and organizing lectures and discussions on topics related to the initiative.
3. The project encourages local residents to get involved in urban gardening.
4. It has allowed the gardeners to produce healthy and cheaper food for consumption and is promoting sustainable agricultural practices. 5. In addition to the above-said benefits, the site provides a place for community interaction and relaxation. (1, 2 and 3)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Number of members and new gardeners, number of events (both educational and cultural) organized and amount of food produced. (1)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of November, 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
Citizens who are the member of the place or the gardeners or food producers are involved in all the decision making processes. They organize meetings and discuss any issues. (1 and 2)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Yes
Please specify
Based on the meetings the members take decisions about any kind of improvements or change. (1 and 2)
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
poljak_istenic_et_2016.pdf (216.5 KB) 216.5 KB
List of references
1. KUD Obrat (2020). Beyond a Construction Site: A Community-Based Garden Intervention in a Degraded Urban Space in Ljubljana. available at http://www.obrat.org/onkraj-gradbisca-beyond-construction-site. Accessed on 5th November, 2020.
2. KUD Obrat (2020). Onkraj gradbišča. available at https://onkrajgradbisca.wordpress.com/. accessed on 5th November, 2020
3. Poljak Istenič Saša. (2016) Reviving Public Spaces through Cycling and Gardening. Etnološka Tribina 39, vol. 46., str. 157-175.
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Urban Gardening in Ljubljana
Urban Gardening in Ljubljana
Photographer Suzana Kajba (2011), retrieved 07/23/2018 from Polonca Lovsin
Image
Urban Gardening in Ljubljana
Urban Gardening in Ljubljana
Photographer: Gregor Gobec (2011), retrieved 07/23/2018 from Polonca Lovsin
Please specify other source of non-financial contribution
Community groups Kud Obrat