1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Mobile (FUA)
Region
Northern America
Short description of the intervention
The Three Mile Creek Watershed project is part of the City Council watershed management plans (Ref 2) to stabilize the banks and the stream along the Twelve Mile Creek and Langan Park Lake, both of which drain into Three Mile Creek and Mobile Bay (Ref 1). The project aims to address the issues of degradation of the banks and destabilization of the creek, undercutting of sanitary sewer crossings and sedimentation in the creek and Langan Park Lake because of the increased water flow speed due to stormwater conveyance (Ref 2). Besides, major pollutants from run-off and sewage water contribute to the degradation of Three Mile Creek (Ref 5). Key initiatives include stabilizing the banks and streambed of the Twelve Mile Creek, dredging and restoring Langan Park Lake, and implementing instream structures to reduce erosion and protect infrastructure (Ref 2). The project also emphasizes reducing pollutants from stormwater runoff, improving water quality, and helping to protect the area’s estuarine and marine water resources (Ref 1). The project will increase natural habitat and contribute to regulating biodiversity by aiding in the abatement of invasive species such as the apple snail (Ref 2). It is expected to contribute to enhancing recreational access through the development of trails, educational programs, and water sports facilities. The overall goal is to restore ecological health, support flood control, improve the quality of life in the Mobile and Prichard communities and make the Three Mile Creek a recreational destination (Ref 6).
Implementation area characterization
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2014
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2023
End date of the intervention
2025
Present stage of the intervention
Objectives of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The project included the following goals:
1) Supporting flood control (Ref 2)
2) To improve water quality and reduce pollutants, that were producing algal blooms (Ref 5, 3)
3) Restore ecological health (creation of habitat, reducing invasive species, protection of marine water resources) (Ref 1)
4) Improve the quality of life and enhance recreational access (Ref 1)
5) Restore the heritage and cultural connection between the watershed and the community (Ref 5)
6) Plan and prepare for climate resiliency (heavy rains and sea level rise) (Ref 5)
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities and NBS focus
Implementation activities
1) Stabilizing the banks and streambed of Twelve Mile Creek by restoring riparian buffers and natural connections to flood plains (Ref 3) 2) Dredging and restoring Langan Park Lake (Ref 2)
3) Implementing instream structures (new trunk sewer and new tanks to increase sewer system capacity (Ref 6 video)) to reduce stream velocity/energy, reduce erosion, protect existing sanitary sewer crossings, and increase natural habitat (Ref 1)
4) Eliminate all know illicit connections/sanitary inputs (Ref 3)
5) Creating three access points, five portage enhancements for recreational access in the creek (Ref 3)
6) Install environmental education signage in six existing or proposed parks (Ref 3)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Lakes/ponds
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Green areas for water management
Sustainable urban drainage systems
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Demographics in implementation area
Demographics of the city of Mobile (Ref 7):
- Total population: 187,041
- Median age: 37.3
- Median household income: $50,051
- Average family size: 3.16
- Ethnicity: Black or African American (Non-Hispanic): 52.9%, White (Non-Hispanic): 39.7%, Two+ (Non-Hispanic): 2.18%, Asian (Non-Hispanic): 1.85%, and Two+ (Hispanic): 1.25%
Socio-economic profile of the area
Communities vulnerable to environmental hazards or climate change impacts
Yes
Specification of climate or environmentally vulnerable communities
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Researchers, university
Citizens or community groups
Primary Beneficiaries
Specify primary beneficiaries
- Citizens of Mobile (Ref 3)
- those with commercial interests in the watershed (Ref 3)
Measures for inclusion of marginalised groups
"Communities are vulnerable to saltwater intrusion and inundation", "restoring the Three Mile Creek's hydrology and water quality [...] to ensure watershed and community resilience" (Ref 4)
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
Project Lead: City of Mobile
Partners: University of South Alabama, Mobile Bay National Estuary Program (NGO), MAWSS (Mobile Area Water & Sewer System), The Village of Spring Hill (a group of citizens)
Funding: Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, RESTORE Council
Publicly-owned utility: Mobile Area Water & Sewer System (MAWSS)
Consultants:
Phase 1 and 2: McCrory and Williams
Phase 1 Construction: James H. Adams & Son Construction
Phase 3: Geosyntec Consultants
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Public sector institution
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Researchers/university
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Level of citizen and community engagement
Community empowerment or capacity-building initiatives
Participatory methods/forms of stakeholder involvement (all stakeholders)
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to a Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
The Three Mile Creek Watershed project is part of the City Council watershed management plans (Ref 2)
Relevant strategy or plan
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers & Barriers
Please provide details (e.g, name of the plan or strategy) for the selected policies or initiatives.
The governance involves multiple actors - public and private - including local government, publicly-owned utility, consultancy company, citizens group, university and NGO.
Arrangements for governance cooperation
Barriers
The following potential barriers were identified at the designing stage in 2014 (Ref 5):-
- Lack of awareness about the Creek, making it difficult to generate public support
- changing the littering culture in this area.
The potential for increased crime is a fear expressed in some neighborhoods.
- Physical obstructions in Three Mile Creek will limit paddlers' use.
- Different perceptions in populations east vs. west of I-65.
- Industrial sites were singled out as potentially problematic.
Financing
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The costs of correcting the significant problems affecting the Three Mile Creek Watershed are anticipated to range between $43 million and $145 million, which includes addressing lack of recreational access and mitigating impacts associated with sea level rise (Ref 3)
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Funding through 2021: 12 280 940 USD = 11 062 817,69 Euros (exchange rate on 20/08/2024: 1 USD = 0,901060 EUR) (Ref 2)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Entrepreneurship opportunities
Unknown
Business models
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
-Storm / wave induced erosion and flooding: "Increased stream velocity due to stormwater systems have contributed to the degradation of the banks" "Instream structures will be constructed to reduce stream velocity/energy" (Ref 1)
-Improved water quality: "The project will improve water quality" (Ref 1)
-Increased protection against flooding: "support flood control" (Ref 1)
-Improved stormwater management: "Increased velocities due to storm water conveyance systems have contributed to the degradation of the banks" "Instream structures will be constructed to reduce stream velocity/energy" (Ref 2)
-Enhanced protection and restoration of coastal and marine ecosystems: "help to protect the area’s estuarine and marine water resources." (Ref 1)
-Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems: "The Three Mile Creek watershed [...] supporting a broad diversity of both marine and freshwater species" (Ref 5)
-Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems: help to protect the area’s estuarine and marine water resources." (Ref 1), "The Three Mile Creek watershed [...] supporting a broad diversity of both marine and freshwater species" (Ref 5)
Environmental impact indicators
Total area of habitat restored (in ha)
unknown
Water retention capacity (m³ or %)
unknown
Volume of stormwater treated (m³)
unknown
Description of economic benefits
More sustainable tourism: there is an expectation that the project will "make the Three Mile Creek a recreational destination" (Ref 6)
Economic impact indicators
Number of jobs created (e.g. park maintenance, landscaping, ecotourism)
unknown
Social and cultural impact indicators
Surface area of accessible green spaces (in ha)
unknown
Total area of recreational green space created or restored (in ha)
unknown
Number of environmental education programs, workshops, outreach activities (eg. in schools, community centers, public spaces)
unknown
Description of social and cultural benefits
-Improved social cohesion: the project is expected to "also reconnect the communities to Three Mile Creek by providing them access to extraordinary green space in the middle of an existing urban community" (Ref 5)
-Gain in activities for recreation and exercise: "make the Three Mile Creek a recreational destination" (Ref 6)
-Increased awareness of flora and fauna as culturally and historically meaningful: "reconnect Three Mile Creek to its surrounding communities." (Ref 5)
-Increased knowledge of locals about local nature: "Install environmental education signage in six existing or proposed parks" (Ref 3)
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Actors involved in the assessment, monitoring or evaluation of NBS impacts
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
- This five-year CIP [Capital Improvement Plan] proposes an annual cycle of monitoring and updating in alignment with the City’s budgeting process and regular assessments of Map for Mobile. The steps in that cycle, depicted graphically below, are: 1. Identify (Nov-Dec) ; 2. Score (Jan) ; 3. Prioritize (Feb-Mar) ; 4. Refine (Apr-Jun) ; 5. Adopt (Jul-Aug) (Ref 2)
- Water quality and biological monitoring : “Report Assessment of Water Quality, Benthic Invertebrates, and Periphyton in the Three Mile Creek Basin, Mobile, Alabama, 1999-2003." (Ref 5)
- Establish a Stormwater and Tidal Monitoring System (Ref 5)
- Monitoring performance/outcomes (Ref 5)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Justice
Community satisfaction
Trade-offs & Negative impacts
Measures to prevent gentrification or displacement
High-quality & Transformative NBS
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
Yes
Goal setting and impacts delivery
Yes, from the planning phase the project aimed to address issues in these three key priority areas and it also delivered benefits across these three areas.
Long-term perspective
Yes
Cost-effective solutions
Unknown
Equitable impacts
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
References
1.
Map for Mobile (n.d.). Three Mile Creek Watershed Restoration - Official Website. Mobile, Al: Map for Mobile, p. 5 Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
2.
City of Mobile (n.d.). Capital Improvement Plan. Mobile, Al: City of Mobile, p. 17. 88. Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
3.
City of Mobile (n.d.). Restoring Three Mile Creek One Neighborhood at a Time - Summary. Mobile, Al: City of Mobile, p. 12 Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Reynier, W. (2017). estoring Three Mile Creek via a Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan. Mobile, AL: Cakex.org, p. 5 Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
5.
Dewberry Consultant (2014). Three Miles Creek Watershed Management Plan. Mobile, Al: Dewberry Consultant, p. 1-13 Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
6.
Mobile Bay National Estuary Program (n.d.). Mobile Bay National Estuary Program - Three Mile Creek + video. Mobile, Al: Mobile Bay National Estuary Program, p. 1 Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
7.
Data-census.gov (2022). Demographics Mobile - Data-census.gov. Mobile, Al: Data-census.gov, Accessed on August 19, 2024, [Source link] [Archive];
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Three Mile Creek Watershed Restoration in Mobile (US), stabilize the bank and stream along Twelve Mile Creek and dredging and restoration of Langan Park Lake
Three Mile Creek Watershed Restoration in Mobile (US)
Official website of tje project (accessed 19/08/2024) https://mapformobile.org/3mcwatershed/