1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Samtredia
Region
Asia
Short description of the intervention
The Rioni River basin is the second largest in Georgia, originating in the Greater Caucasus range and flowing into the Black Sea, traversing the town of Samtredia. Samtredia has been affected directly on many occasions by floods that have become a current occurrence in the Rioni River basin as of late. The underlying causes of vulnerability to climate change in the Rioni basin can be categorised into 1) physical factors –direct manifestations of climate change, 2) factors caused by anthropogenic intervention – those related to the harmful ways in which humans have and continue to interact with the environment which has exacerbated vulnerability and 3) Institutional factors – related to the legislative/regulatory barriers placed by government and other institutions, as well as limited capacity (human and resources) to manage climate change vulnerability. Flooding has been harmful not only to the local population but also to the biodiversity of the area, which suffered losses and an ecological imbalance and a disruption in the habitat patterns of local fauna. Many of these issues became the focal point of an activity developed by the Adaptation Fund alongside the Georgian government as early as 2012. The intervention stretched for 4 years and involved several localities in the Rioni River Basin, including Samtredia municipality, consisting of creating bank terracing, vegetative buffers, and tree revetments in order to address floods related to the Rioni River basin and the localities it traverses. (1,2)
Address

0119 Samtredia
Georgia

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
River basin
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2011
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2012
End date of the intervention
2017
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
In Samtredia municipality floods have threatened the population in the last 10 years constantly and the intensity and duration of precipitation events combined with early and more accelerated snowmelt are likely to increase due to climate change. The intervention aims to establish long-term flood management practices, enabling the Georgian government to manage flood risk more sustainably.
The identified goals of the intervention are:
1. To mobilize local communities to implement flood risk adaptation measures such as trenching, terracing, re-plantation, deep root bush and shrub zones, nut trees or tea plantations (traditional of the region).
2. To provide direct adaptation measures to reduce flood levels experienced and provide flood warnings to improve the ability of the affected population to respond and move out of danger during a flood (including early warning systems).
3. To provide maintenance/restoration of biodiversity by strengthening the functionality of the ecosystems.
4. Habitat creation through the restoration of the natural floodplain by zoning development away from the functional floodplain and creating floodways.
5. Control runoff and soil erosion through agroforestry, thereby reducing losses of water, soil material, organic matter and nutrients.
6. To contribute to developing a green economy by providing jobs and business opportunities to local people. (1,2)
Quantitative targets
Targeting six municipalities – Lentekhi, Oni, Ambrolauri, Tskaltubo, Samtredia and Tsageri
Building resilience for 200,000 people of which approx. 25,000 live in Samtredia
Selecting 8 plots with an area of 10 ha to implement agro-forestry activities (Samtredia and Tskaltubo)
Planting different tree species: walnut, hazelnut, acacia
Establishing a fully integrated flood early warning system (Deltares-FEWS) which links forecasting models to telemetered data as input and forecasting reporting and warning systems as output. (1,2,3)
Monitoring indicators defined
Number of municipalities targeted
Number of people benefit from the action
Number of plots considered for the implementation
Type of trees planned for planting
Type of EWS (1,2,3)
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
The intervention is part of the project “Developing Climate Resilient Flood and Flash Flood Management Practices to Protect Vulnerable Communities of Georgia” (2011–2016) led by UNDP and the Adaptation Fund. As part of the actions, a research and analysis study has been conducted and it revealed about 300 active landslide points with a total area of 11,470 ha. Ninety-eight mudflow rivers were identified, and cadastres for all detected points were drawn up. Meteorological and hydrological data from 26 hydrological stations/posts were digitized and uploaded to the project’s server. Socio-economic data were collected by the project from six pilot municipalities and additionally from 12 municipalities of the Rioni River basin. All collected digital data were used for landslide hazard assessment. Local communities were involved throughout the entire intervention, including through consultations and implementation. Local emergency response staff were also trained to ensure better local emergency preparedness planning and response coordination. In Samtredia and Tskaltubo in 2015 a tree planting massive campaign around the Rioni river basin was conducted and 20,900 trees were planted on more than 9 hectares. A comprehensive list of activities can be found in Reference 4. (1,3,4) These activities address hazards like landslides, flash floods, mudflow in the steep and mountainous upstream areas, as well as flooding, and erosion of river beds in the floodplain downstream areas.
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Community gardens and allotments
Horticulture
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Please specify "other Climate change adaptation activity"
Implement flooding early detection mechanisms.
Please specify the number of plots or allotment gardens
Unknown
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
24,000 (4)
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Citizens or community groups
Coalition with multiple of the above
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
UNDP and Adaptation Fund in cooperation with the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resource Protection of Georgia took charge of the intervention. The Adaptation Fund finances this climate adaptation and resilience project with the help of the local communities as well. (1,2)
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Local government/municipality
Citizens or community group
Multilateral organisation
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Yes
Please specify the "Regional Directive/Strategy"
This intervention was not implemented as a response to an EU Directive however, it is part of the project “Developing Climate Resilient Flood and Flash Flood Management Practices to Protect Vulnerable Communities of Georgia” (2011–2016) that was designed and submitted to the Adaptation Fund, an organization established under the Kyoto Protocol and funded by governments as well as private funders (Adaptation Fund 2015). (1)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
The project aligns with and contributes to the implementation of the law on Protection of Population and Territories against Natural and Manmade Emergency Situations; Water law and soil protection law. Moreover, the Georgian legislation currently lacks any legal standards or regulations on zoning in the floodplain areas or high hazard-prone regions. (2) The project implements the Georgian Government’s priorities for effective and long-term flood prevention and management measures by direct involvement of local municipalities and populations residing in the highly-exposed locations. (4)
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
Not exactly a local strategy, but the intervention aimed to take an integrated and comprehensive approach by addressing critical gaps in land use policy and the regulatory framework fundamental to climate-resilient flood management within the addressed municipalities. (4)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project specifically targeted the six municipalities of Ambrolauri, Oni, Lentekhi, Tsageri, Tskaltubo and Samtredia. (2)
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The intervention is part of the project “Developing Climate Resilient Flood and Flash Flood Management Practices to Protect Vulnerable Communities of Georgia” (2011–2016) led by UNDP and the Adaptation Fund. The project produces several papers addressing floods: 1. Study of Dam Safety Practices; 2. Best International Practices in Dam Safety Programs (please see attached documents)
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Unknown
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
As the intervention is part of a larger project, costs for Samtredia were hard to divide. The overall cost (including all the municipalities, towns, and villages) was 5,316,500 USD - 4,752, 303 EUR (as per convergency rate of 15.04.2022 available at https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=5136500&From=USD&To=EUR) (5)
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Please specify technological innovation
An innovative flood insurance model has been developed, which calculates losses to be insured within each flood insurance zone (based risk model and flood zoning) and the associated payouts that should be made in each event to each flood receptor. (4)
Please specify social innovation
The hard and soft skills used in the project and the comprehensive project approach targeted different stakeholder levels inclusively: institutions such as the Ministry of Environment, NEA as the main implementing partner, working both at the national and local level, technical and political stakeholders in the six target municipalities, and working directly with affected communities on the ground, contributed to a shared understanding and developed a working method that was both innovative for the country and highly conducive to obtaining results. The project is an innovative and pioneer design that provides a good approach for climate change adaptation management of the river basins in Georgia. It has been designed with a holistic and comprehensive focus that makes it particularly suited for the needs of the country. (4)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
The project has the potential to be replicated and scaled up to cover the entire country, ensuring coverage of the entire river basins (upper and lower parts). Successful practices and models tested in the Rioni River Basin can be expanded to the other regions of Georgia. (4)
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The environmental benefits of the intervention translated through tangible impacts such as an increase in the green area through the almost 24,000 trees, deep-root bushes and shrubbery that were planted, incorporating 10 ha, as per a report from UNDP, dating 2018. Moreover, the trees planted were of different varieties, therefore, increasing the number of tree species present, such as Acacia, hazelnuts, wild plum, ash tree, nut, oak and walnuts. These varieties have land reclamation properties and high economic value. For example, Acacia plantations can grow rapidly in humid climates (such as the target region), delivering in as little as seven years, even on degraded and infertile soils where other tree species cannot be successfully established. These local tree varieties are expected to control runoff and soil erosion, thereby reducing losses of water, soil material, organic matter and nutrients. Additionally, these species have critical soil fixation properties, especially in sloppy terrains that dominate the project site and were expected to contribute to the protection of the slopes and shores of the rivers. (2, 4, 6)
Please specify other socio-cultural impact
Policy creation: UNDP and the Adaptation Fund continued to assist the Government of Georgia to introduce a combination of structural and non-structural measures in managing floods and flash floods, developing new national policies, legislation and tools such as a flood zoning policy, a Weather Index Insurance Scheme, flood resilient building codes and a Flood Forecasting and Early Warning System which currently covers Rioni basin but can be extended to the other parts of the country under similar threats. (5)
Description of economic benefits
Local people were employed in the implementation of climate of Agroforestry schemes (about 160 local people were employed - at least 50% were women) that indeed generated more ownership and enabled generating income. The project has partnered with ELKANA, a Georgian NGO who led these works. (4)
Description of social and cultural benefits
According to the project's evaluation report for 2017, social benefits consisted in improving the community's safety to climate hazards by issuing maps for hazards. For example, flood maps have been prepared for the whole Rioni and Tskhenistskali rivers with 2, 5, 20, 50, 100, 500, 1000 years flood return periods.
The intervention also helped with increasing the level of knowledge of locals regarding solutions based on nature as in the vicinity of Samtredia the inhabitants took the challenge to ensure the proper nurturing of the intervention (trees, bushes, grass) even beyond the life of the project.
Another important aspect regarding social benefits was that the project was successful in engaging communities and building ownership through an intensive communication and awareness-raising campaign. This was seen through the fact that locals continued to support the trees that were planted as part of the intervention. (4)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Number of trees planted
Number of people employed
Type of species planted
Types of maps created (2,4)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
a) Documentary review of project outputs and reports submitted by the project
b) 22 Key Informant Interviews (KII) with: 6 Government of Georgia officials and PEB members (NEA, MoENRP, MIA MRDI), 6 UNDP (project staff, experts, CTA and RTA), 2 implementing partners (including 3 contractors), 2 other partners, 6 officials from the target municipalities;
c) Field work in six municipalities including:
• One focus group discussion in 11 men from Ianeti village (Samtredia)
• One individual interview with the representative of Bugeuli village
• Joint group interview in Oni with municipality and village representatives
• On-site observation of an actual sample of project interventions (4)
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
The project ended in 2017 therefore the pandemic had no effect on its implementation.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
Yes
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
Activities have been prioritised through consultation with local communities including heads of municipalities, NEA (National Environment Agency at the Ministry of Environment Protection) local staff responsible for management of the hydrometric network and national NEA and Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure (MRDI) staff responsible for the assessment of need (NEA) and implementation of flood protection measures in the catchment (MRDI). (2)
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
Best International Practices in Dam Safety Programs (1.12 MB) 1.12 MB
Study of Dam Safety Practices (922.42 KB) 922.42 KB
List of references
1. Shatberashvili, N.; Rucevska, I.; Jørstad, H.; Artsivadze, K.; Mehdiyev, B.; Aliyev, M.; Fayvush, G.; Dzneladze, M.; Jurek, M.; Kirkfeldt, T. & Semernya, L. (2015). Outlook on climate change adaptation in the South Caucasus mountains. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal and Sustainable Caucasus. Nairobi, Arendal and Tbilisi, available at https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/21/original/Caucasus_screen.pdf?1483646272 (accessed 15-04-2022)
2. Adaptation Fund (no date), Program Information (documentatioj regarding the intervention), available at https://www.adaptation-fund.org/projects-document-view/?URL=en/337661538084498567/52-RESUBMISSION-4583-AF-Georgia-Flood-Management-ProjDoc-revision-10-10-2011.pdf (accessed 15-04-2022)
3. ReliefWeb (2015), Forests: Slowing the Flow, available at https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/forests-slowing-flow (accessed 15-04-2022)
4. Adaptation Fund (2019), Evaluation Report, available at https://www.adaptation-fund.org/projects-document-view/?URL=en/417801538084506791/pdf/52-4583-terminal-evaluation-report-Georgia-final.pdf (accessed 15-04-2022)
5. UNDP (2016), Flood Management in the Rioni River Basin, available at https://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/successstories/flood-management-in-the-rioni-river-basin/ (accessed 15-04-2022)
6. UNDP (2016), Climate Change Adaptation in Europe and Central Asia: Adapting to a changing climate for resilient development, available at https://www.adaptation-undp.org/resources/reports-and-publications-country-teams/climate-change-adaptation-europe-and-central-asia (accessed 20-04-2022)
Comments and notes
Additional insights
original short description:
The Rioni River basin is the second largest in Georgia and the largest in Western Georgia originating in the Greater Caucasus range and flowing into the Black Sea near the city of Poti. The river also traverses the town of Samtredia, a municipality located 27 km from Georgia's second-largest city, Kutaisi. Georgia’s most important roads and railways converge there, making Samtredia the country’s vital transport hub. Though Samtredia is not a large city, it is an important one and has been affected directly on many occasions by floods that have become a current occurrence in the Rioni River basin as of late. The underlying causes of vulnerability to climate change in the Rioni basin can be categorised into 1) physical factors –direct manifestations of climate change, 2) factors caused by anthropogenic intervention – those related to the harmful ways in which humans have and continue to interact with the environment which has exacerbated vulnerability and 3) Institutional factors – related to the legislative/regulatory barriers placed by government and other institutions, as well as limited capacity (human and resources) to manage climate change vulnerability. Flooding has been harmful not only to the local population, whose safety decreased over the years but also to the biodiversity of the area, which suffered losses and an ecological imbalance as well as a disruption in the habitat patterns of local fauna. Many of these issues became the focal point of an activity developed by the Adaptation Fund alongside the Georgian government as early as 2012. The intervention stretched for a 4 year period and involved several localities in the Rioni River Basin, including Samtredia municipality. (1,2)

Original goals question:
The majority of the territory of Samtredia Municipality is located on the Kolkheti Lowland and very small part of the Sajavakho plateau. Total area of the district is 341.1 km2, population size – 60,300 and density – about 166 persons per km2 which is a very high population density. There are 50 settlements in the municipality, including 1 city – Samtredia, 1 town – Kulashi and the rest – communities. In Samtredia municipality floods have threatened the population in the last 10 years constantly and Intensity and duration of precipitation events combined with early and more accelerated snow melt, as a result of temperature alleviations, are likely to increase due to climate change. The intervention aims to establish long-term flood management practices enabling the Georgian government to manage flood risk in a more sustainable manner.
The identified goals of the intervention are:
1. To mobilize local communities to implement flood risk adaptation measures such as trenching, terracing, re-plantation, deep root bush and shrub zones, nut tree or tea plantations (traditional of the region).
2. To provide direct adaptation measures to reduce flood levels experienced, and provide flood warning to improve the ability of the affected population to respond and move out of danger during a flood (including early warning systems)
3. To provide maintenance/restoration of biodiversity by strengthening the functionality of the ecosystems.
4. Habitat creation through the restoration of the natural floodplain by zoning development away from the functional floodplain and creating floodways.
5. Control runoff and soil erosion through agro-forestry, thereby reducing losses of water, soil material, organic matter and nutrients.
6. To contribute to the development of a green economy by providing jobs and business opportunities to local people. (1,2)

Text taken from the economic impatcs:
While considerable focus was placed upon the capacity and resources required to build key national institutions like the National Environment Agency (NEA), the project also paid particular attention to the practical implementation component and addressed the direct interests of local communities ‘on-the-ground’ through their active participation and employment in the community-based adaptation measures, such as bank terracing, river bank protection works, and vegetative buffers and other agroforestry activities. (2)

environmental impacts:
The environmental benefits of the intervention translated through tangible impacts such as an increase in the green area through the almost 24,000 trees, deep-root bushes and shrubbery that were planted, incorporating 10 ha, as per a report from UNDP, dating 2018. Moreover, the trees planted were of different varieties, therefore, increasing the number of tree species present, such as Acacia, hazelnuts, wild plum, ash tree, nut, oak and walnuts. These varieties have land reclamation properties and high economic value. For example, Acacia plantations can grow rapidly in humid climates (such as the target region), delivering in as little as seven years, even on degraded and infertile soils where other tree species cannot be successfully established. These local tree varieties are already popular in the target region, with high demand and saturation in the local market. They were expected to control runoff and soil erosion, thereby reducing losses of water, soil material, organic matter and nutrients. Additionally, these species have critical soil fixation properties, especially in sloppy terrains that dominate in the project site and were expected to contribute to the protection of the slopes and shores of the rivers. (2, 4, 6)
Public Images
Image
Rioni River
Rioni River
https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/21/original/Caucasus_screen.pdf?1483646272
Image
Photo 2
Aforestation
https://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2015/03/21/forests-slowing-the-flow.html