1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Singapore
Region
Asia
Short description of the intervention
The redevelopment of the Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park (Singapore) saw the naturalisation of the previously channelised Kallang River, as well as the installation of wetland cells as water cleansing biotopes and creation of butterfly habitats (Ref. 1).

The Kallang River was previously confined to a concrete canal that ran to the southern edges of Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park (Ref. 1). The channel segregated the two residential areas situated on either side of the park, with the river's 2.7km continuous concrete channel being crossable at only certain defined points (Ref. 3). Following its naturalisation, culminating in 2012, the now 3.2km meandering river is considered the park's highlight, "merg[ing] seamlessly with the park's greenery" (Refs. 1 & 6), and creating a "blue-green recreational network which is well-integrated with nearby residential areas" (Ref. 2).
Address

1384 Ang Mo Kio Ave 1
Singapore
Singapore

Area boundary
POINT (103.850196 1.357394)
POINT (103.851916 1.360322)
POINT (103.843334 1.364016)
POINT (103.828655 1.367694)
POINT (103.828428 1.3671)
POINT (103.834129 1.365116)
POINT (103.833694 1.363752)
POINT (103.834998 1.363981)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Google maps, https://www.google.com/maps/place/Bishan-Ang+Mo+Kio+Park/@1.3638618,103.8398669,15.34z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x31da1720c0e3288f:0x7de130104fef81c5!8m2!3d1.3634088!4d103.8435614 [accessed 30/9/21].
Total area
620000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2006
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2009
End date of the intervention
2012
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The main aims of the intervention included: "address the dual need for water supply independence and flood protection while creating access to a thriving waterscape within a dense urban area" (Ref. 8); as well as: "transform the country’s network of utilitarian drains, canals, and reservoirs into vibrant and beautiful streams, rivers, and lakes, seamlessly integrated with their adjacent land developments" with the goal of creat[ing] new spaces close to the water for recreation and community bonding" and "turn[ing] Singapore into a vibrant city of gardens and water" (Ref. 3).

Other goals included (Ref. 8):
• Create natural and vegetated river banks, while freeing the Kallang River from a concrete channel and integrate it into the park;
• Increase aquatic and riparian biodiversity;
• Increase the number and types of microhabitats;
• Promote the resilience of the species and guarantee their long-term capacity to survive;
• Prevent soil erosion from reducing the green and recreational spaces within the park;
• Provide multiple and flexible water storage facilities;
• Ensure that the constructed infrastructure will resist floods and remain in good conditions;
• Maximise land, monetary, and human resources;
• Create a new space for different communities to encounter and for recreational purposes;
• Bring people closer to water;
• Create a positive perception and sense of stewardship towards the environment;
• Offer space in the heart of urbanity where people can observe, preserve and nurture wildlife;
• Contribute to the liveability of the city;
• Design friendly spaces for all kinds of visitors, especially for children, pet owners, and seniors.
Quantitative targets
Objectives defined for the project were largely qualitative.


Monitoring indicators defined
Whilst numerous impacts have been recorded as a result of the intervention, relatively little information exists on pre-determined monitoring indicators. Nonetheless, Ref. 9 considers how the planning of the park restoration required "extensive tests [to be] carried out to refine a selection of appropriate techniques and plants, as well as finding an effective construction method". Being "the first time that soil bioengineering techniques were applied in urbanised Singapore", a testbed was constructed to evaluate the suitability of various techniques and plants prior to full roll-out of the intervention (Ref. 11). Over ten different types of potential "systems and plants were evaluated along a 60-meter test" strip (Ref. 8).

Recognising that the Kallang river would undergo geomorphological changes over time, the need for "periodic site
walkthroughs, topography survey[s] and hydraulic/hydrodynamic modelling" was underlined as a means by which to monitor the evolving hydraulic capacity of the river (Ref. 11). Monitoring of the river's condition was also promoted to tourists and visitors to the park as an ecological education activity (Ref. 7).
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
The primary activity implemented to achieve the above-outlined objectives and targets centred around the ecological restoration of the Kallang River. Following the demolition of the concrete river channel, a new riverbed was excavated which incorporated features of a natural river design such as meanders, width variations, pools, riffles and rocky obstacles (Ref. 8). Such an approach was taken to create different flow patterns, promote varying water velocities and improve habitat diversity (Ref. 8).

Through the use of soil bioengineering techniques, vegetation at the site was increased and the risk of soil erosion minimised (Ref. 7). The creation of wetlands was undertaken to provide a nature-based cleansing biotope which would improve water quality within the river itself and therein the reservoir into which the river flows (Refs. 1, 7 and 11). In 2012, volunteers and residents were enlisted to specific plants which would create butterfly habitats within the park (Ref. 1).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
Green areas for water management
Rain gardens
Swales and filter strips
Sustainable urban drainage systems
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
What is the level of innovation / development of the NBS related to water management?
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The project was co-led by Singapore's national water agency (PUB) and the National Parks Board (NParks) (Ref. 9) Acting as a flagship initiative under PUB's ABC Waters programme, the park restoration and naturalisation of Kallang River illustrated "how government agencies with different disciplines (for example, parks and water) can work together to meet the challenges and opportunities ahead of them" (Ref. 3).
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Citizens or community group
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the national regulations/strategy/plan
The intervention was a flagship project for the 'Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters' initiative, a long-term programme launched by Singapore’s national water agency (PUB) which aims to "transform the country’s water bodies beyond their functions of drainage and water supply, into vibrant, new spaces for community bonding and recreation" (Ref. 5). See Ref. 11 for the fourth edition of the ABC programme's Design Guidelines.
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project has been featured in research articles. For example, it provides a case study of an ecological strategy employed in urban ecological parks (see Ref. 7). The intervention was the first case of soil bioengineering techniques being used in a river naturalisation in the tropics (Ref. 3), hence serves as a reference for the application of such techniques elsewhere in tropical climates (Ref. 8). It also provides a successful case study of water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) (Ref. 10).
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
€45 million
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Whilst maintenance costs are unclear, naturalisation of the river as opposed to repair of its concrete channel is considered to have resulted in cost savings: "the National University of Singapore carried out a cost-benefit analysis that reported that rebuilding the concrete canal would cost about US$94 million (133 million SGD, Singapore dollars). Naturalization, on the other hand, cost just under US$50 million (70 million SGD) and further contributed to expanding and reconnecting the park areas to the city" (Ref. 4).
Please specify total cost (EUR)
76 million SGD = 45 million EUR (1 SGD = 0.64 EUR) (Ref. 5).
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Please specify other type of fund used
The project was a joint initiative between Singapore’s Public Utilities Board (PUB) and the National Parks Board (NParks), hence was co-financed by these two public entities (Ref. 8). It is unclear whether the budget was earmarked for the project prior to its initiation.
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
The naturalisation of the Kallang river was supported through the implementation of soil bioengineering techniques and was the first case of such techniques being used in the tropics (Ref. 3. It also provides a successful case study of water-sensitive urban design (WSUD), a relatively novel approach in Asian cities (Ref. 10).
Please specify social innovation
The ABC Programme under which the Kallang River restoration was embarked upon as a flagship project was considered an exemplary case of "how government agencies with different disciplines (for example, parks and water) can work together to meet the challenges and opportunities ahead of them" (Ref. 3).
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
As summarised by the Singaporean National Parks Board (NParks, Ref. 3), "This is the first river naturalisation project in the tropics to incorporate soil bioengineering techniques to stabilise the riverbanks, protect them from erosion, and provide habitats for the flora and fauna, and it will serve to be a vital reference source for future projects in the region". Restoration of the park and river further "presented an opportunity for the installation of the
first cleansing biotope in Singapore, which offers effective water treatment while maintaining a natural and beautiful environment" (Ref. 3), hence was a novel innovation for the region. The novelty of the intervention is further exemplified by the requirement for testbeds to have been developed in which potential soil bioengineering techniques could be optimised and a wide variety of native plant species could be explored for their inclusion into the restoration (Ref. 3).
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Despite being recognised that the restoration project "will serve to be a vital reference source for future projects in the region" (Ref. 3), it is unclear whether such future projects have since been informed by this initiative.
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The capacity of the Kallang River was increased through its naturalisation. Through the use of bioengineering techniques, it was converted from a "2,700 meters long, 17-24 meters wide, straight concrete drainage channel...into a 3,200 meters long, 100 meters wide, sinuous natural river meandering through the park" (Ref. 7). The drainage capacity of the river has increased by 40%, and through the integration of the river into the park, as compared to the river's being confined to the concrete channel previously, the "instantaneous rainwater generated by heavy rainfall [is now] able to flow into the downstream of the river" (Ref. 7). In addition to the river now acting as a drainage system for the park, the park in turn acts as a floodplain for the river (Ref. 9).

The removal of the concrete infrastructure and planting of vegetation has also seen a reduction in the urban heat island effect (Ref. 9). Water quality has been improved through the use of substrates and plants which were specifically selected for use in the cleansing biotope due to their being able to filter pollutants out of, and absorb nutrients from, the water (Ref. 1).

Through the creation of "a huge variety of microhabitats", biodiversity has increased by 30% within the park, and "the resilience of the species within the park [has been supported], thus ensuring their long-term ability to survive"(Refs. 3 and 7). Visitors to the park are informed of the various trees and wildflowers which can be found on-site, in addition to over 90 bird species (including some migratory species and species not typically found in urban environments); over 30 dragonfly species; and over 30 butterfly species (Ref. 1). A family of smooth-coated otters have also been sighted in the park since 2015 (Ref. 1).
Description of economic benefits
Whilst unclear what the maintenance costs for the park are, the construction costs of the revitalised park and naturalised river are considered lower than the costs associated with the alternate option of repairing the existing concrete channel through which the river ran. A cost-benefit analysis conducted by the National University of Singapore recorded that "rebuilding the concrete canal would cost about US$94 million (133 million SGD, Singapore dollars)", whereas naturalisation of the river "cost just under US$50 million (70 million SGD)" (Ref. 4).
Description of social and cultural benefits
Positive physical and mental health impacts are considered to have been generated as a result of the project "bringing [people] closer to nature" (Ref. 4). Although introduced after the reopening of the park in 2012, the installation of an allotment garden (2018) and a therapeutic garden (2017) have further provided benefits through enhancing an individual's physical, mental and social wellbeing (Ref. 1).

An Ecolife Tour organised by NParks allows families to learn about the park and the biodiversity within it; a 'Friends of Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park' group of stakeholders and volunteers has been established, and a further volunteer programme has also been established (Ref. 1).

In its previous concretised state, the Kallang River acted as a physical barrier, leading to the separation of the two residential areas on either side of the park (Ref. 3), in addition to creating a "clear dividing line between the park and community" (Ref. 4). The newly restored river, on the other hand, "beckons the surrounding community to enter and engage it from all sides" (Ref. 3). Bridges and "people friendly river crossings" - such as stepping stones which become exposed when the water level is low - now "connect the once separate neighbourhoods" (Ref. 9).

In order to further strengthen community participation and ecological education, "school-age children [were invited] to design art patterns for playgrounds" within the park, and following its restoration, family fun tours and activities began to be hosted on weekend mornings (Ref. 7). Furthermore, "various ecological education activities were held in combination with the ecological design of the park, such as organizing tourists to observe the ecological transformation process of the park and the river, inviting them to monitor physical conditions of the river and introducing horticulture to the park" (Ref. 7).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Environmental:
- biodiversity increase by percentage;
- type and number of species present (trees, wildflowers, birds (including migratory and typically non-urban), dragonflies, butterflies and other species e.g. otters); and
- water capacity of the river

Economic:
- reduced construction costs required for naturalisation of the river as compared to repair of traditional grey infrastructure.

Social:
- Number of visitors annually (3 million (Ref. 9);
- Number of public events hosted annually (Ref. 1); and
- Amenities available (see Ref. 1).
Analysis of specific impact categories
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Visitors to the park were advised to remain in groups of two only (see NParks.gov.sg website- October of 2021). No other impacts as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic are known.
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Yes
Please specify
Citizens/tourists were invited to "monitor physical conditions of the river" (Ref. 7).
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. National Parks (2018). Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park Information Booklet. Singapore: Singapore Government. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/a_nparks_bishanamkparkbrochure_r18_fa_p(lowres).pdf?la=en&hash=5C671733088638D8FEBFF4DB1D407097BF42759F [accessed 29/09/21];
2. National Parks (n.d). Your Guide to Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park. Singapore: Singapore Government. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/~/media/nparks-real-content/gardens-parks-and-nature/diy-walk/diy-walk-pdf-files/bishan-amk-park.ashx [accessed 29/09/21];
3. Baur, T, Syariffudin, E and Yong, M. Kallang River @ Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park: Integrating River and Park
in an Urban World. Singapore: Singapore Government. CityGreen #5: A Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology Publication. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/cuge/ebook/citygreen/cg5/cg5_09.pdf [accessed 29/9/21];
4. Ghisleni, C and Duduch, T (2021). 6 Urban Design Projects with Nature-Based Solutions. Archdaily. https://www.archdaily.com/964460/6-urban-design-projects-with-nature-based-solutions [accessed 29/9/21];
5. Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl (n.d.). Bishan Park. Ljubljana: Landezine. http://landezine.com/index.php/2012/06/kallang-river-at-bishan-ang-mo-kio-park-by-atelier-dreiseitl/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_IK_rSVf4sMaGnYHrcf0swZzGxOyezD7eOieWUvJHRts-1632927121-0-gqNtZGzNAjujcnBszQN9 [accessed 29/9/21];
6. Ng Keok Poh, L (n.d.). Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park. Singapore: Ramboll. https://ramboll.com/projects/singapore/bishan-park [accessed 29/9/21];
7. Zhongfang, A, Qingchang, C and Jian, L (2020). Ecological Strategies of Urban Ecological Parks – A case of
Bishan Ang Mo Kio Park and Kallang River in Singapore. Shanghai: E3S Web of Conferences 194, ICAEER 2020. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/54/e3sconf_icaeer2020_05060.pdf [accessed 29/9/21];
8. Valladares Navea, V (n.d.). Revitalisation of Urban Streams: A holistic approach to the enhancement of an urban reach of the Pleichach River in the city of Würzburg, Germany. Hamburg: HafenCity Universität. https://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/bitstream/hcu/130/1/Valladares_Valeria.pdf [accessed 29/9/21];
9. Schofield, E (2015). How Bishan Park Became “The Central Park” of Singapore. Luxembourg: Land8. https://land8.com/how-bishan-park-became-the-central-park-of-singapore/ [accessed 29/9/21];
10. OECD, Asian Development Bank Institute and Mekong Institute (2020). The Development Dimension Innovation for Water Infrastructure Development in the Mekong Region. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://books.google.se/books?id=uDP6DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA83&lpg=PA83&dq=bishan-ang+mo+kio+park+and+kallang+river+restoration+%22climate+change%22&source=bl&ots=gV-gT5VGz0&sig=ACfU3U3OFCSZMSkO9GHKclGlB_ghC2ZQjg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi00JbZqZ_zAhVjxIsKHSFZDHgQ6AF6BAgqEAM#v=onepage&q=bishan-ang%20mo%20kio&f=false [accessed 29/9/21]; and
11. Singapore Government (n.d.). Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters: Design Guidelines. 4th Edition. Singapore: Singapore Government. https://www.pub.gov.sg/documents/ABC_waters_design_guidelines.pdf [accessed 29/9/21].
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Bishan Park and the Kallang River channel were both considered in need of an upgrade, with a particular emphasis on increasing the capacity of the Kallang (Ref. 6) in order to cope with increased surface runoff as a result of both climate change and increasing urbanisation (Ref. 11).
The park restoration, in particular the naturalisation of the Kallang River, became a flagship for the Active, Beautiful and Clean (ABC) Waters Programme launched by the Singaporean national water agency, Public Utilities Board (PUB) in 2006 (Ref. 3).
Specific targets were developed, covering the realms of ecology, economy and planning, and society, as discussed further below. A holistic approach was taken to the intervention, with "one of the main features of the redevelopment [being] the restoration of the concrete canal into a naturalised river with bioengineered riverbanks, using a variety of plants and natural materials" (Ref. 11).

Additional project goals:
• Meet the challenges and uncertainties posed by climate change and the expansion of urbanisation;
• Accommodate the Kallang River's natural processes without compromising the use of the park and its recreational spaces.
• Increase the capacity of the Kallang River along the BishanAng Mo Kio Park;
• Utilise the channel’s demolition material to build the new design and further amenities;
• Improve water quality to reduce the need for particle extraction in the Marina Reservoir;
• Increase conveyance capacity and reduce velocity to better protect the urban areas from flood events;
• Transform the vision of water bodies being only drainages and water supply facilities;
• Encourage citizens to slow down and enjoy nature;
Public Images
Image
Kallang River before and after naturalisation
Kallang River before and after naturalisation
https://www.archdaily.com/964460/6-urban-design-projects-with-nature-based-solutions
Image
Kallang River before and after naturalisation
Kallang River before and after naturalisation
https://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/bitstream/hcu/130/1/Valladares_Valeria.pdf
Image
Aerial view of Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park and Kallang River
Aerial view of Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park and Kallang River
https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/cuge/ebook/citygreen/cg5/cg5_09.pdf
Image
Cleansing Biotope
Cleansing Biotope
https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/a_nparks_bishanamkparkbrochure_r18_fa_p(lowres).pdf?la=en&hash=5C671733088638D8FEBFF4DB1D407097BF42759F
Image
Bridge connecting two previously segregated residential areas
Bridge connecting two previously segregated residential areas
https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/cuge/ebook/citygreen/cg5/cg5_09.pdf
Please specify other source of non-financial contribution
Community partners "organized activities to keep the general public constantly engaged" with the project's development (Ref. 8).