1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Zagreb
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Zagreb za mene
Short description of the intervention
“Zagreb for Me” was an ambitious and comprehensive project launched in 2015 by the Zagreb Society of
Architects in cooperation with the Faculty of Architecture at the University of Zagreb and the City of Zagreb.
The goal of the project was to start a revitalization of public spaces through the realization of 17 urban
interventions in the whole city area at the same time. This distributed approach aimed to improve the general
“image of the city” and raise the quality of urban life in segments of housing, recreation, leisure and social
cohesion and revitalization of Zagreb's public spaces using public participation as a tool. This project aims to decentralize designed public spaces and draw attention to some forgotten city spots. At the same time, the project, created from a “bottom-up” initiative, establishes a new model of public participation as well as new forms of collaboration (Ref 1, 2, 3). The project "Zagreb for me" was created on the basis of Acupuncture of the city - an interdisciplinary approach and public participation, but it covers a wider urban space, ie it deals with public spaces throughout Zagreb. After the conducted urban-architectural tenders for the selected solutions, the realization is planned. Only one urban-architectural tender was conducted and the implementation of the project stopped there, but the project "Zagreb for me" was recognized as an example of good practice with the possibility of application in other cities. (Ref 5)
Address

multiple locations
10000 Zagreb
Croatia

Total area
641000000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2015
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2016
End date of the intervention
2018
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The goals of the project were;
- to start a revitalization of public spaces through the realization of 17 urban interventions in the whole city area at the same time.
- to improve the general “image of the city” and raise the quality of urban life in segments of housing, recreation, leisure and social cohesion. Although Zagreb has some significant historical parks and squares in its centre, as well as a few recreational zones, the rest of the city has plenty of neglected open spaces that have no specific function.
- to develop pedestrian areas on derelict train tracks, bike paths, connecting existent green areas and adaption as areas for socialization and recreation (Ref 3)
- to insert small green areas in the city fabric was planned to decrease the urban heat island effects (Ref 1).
Quantitative targets
Revitalizing 17 location selected across the city of Zagreb
Monitoring indicators defined
unknown
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
Climate change adaptation: What activities are implemented to realize the conservation goals and targets?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Please specify "other Type of NBS project"
Restructuring of the city to promote public engagement and relation to the common spaces. The project has not been implemented and was only in the planning stage.
Implementation activities
After the official project announcement, neighbourhood councils, civil society groups and experts were invited to state their opinions about the city's spatial problems and solutions. Zagreb for Me team conducted field surveys at several locations asking citizens what they think which locations they would like to have revitalized. A web platform has been established to share information about the project and to allow citizens to suggest locations online. In total 211 locations were identified, of which 51 were mentioned by numerous people. A scientific team created by the Faculty of Architecture, examined potential locations in terms of the locations importance for the city and its reference in urban planning documents. Both surveys were overlapped and 33 locations were presented and proposed for further selection by citizens. Two pilot subprojects, Think Space and Trnje are part of the project and project for both have already been developed. Only one urban-architectural tender was conducted and the implementation of the project stopped there, but the project "Zagreb for me" was recognized as an example of good practice with the possibility of application in other cities. (Ref 1, 2, 5).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Alley or street trees and other street vegetation
Railroad bank and track greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Green playgrounds and school grounds
Parks and urban forests
Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above selected options are only planned ones.
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above selected options are only planned ones.
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Carbon storage/sequestration
Cultural services
Tourism
Aesthetic appreciation
Inspiration for culture, art and design
Recreation
Mental and physical health and wellbeing
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Please specify "other primary beneficiary"
Tourists. The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected options are only planned ones.
Governance
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Researchers, university
Citizens or community groups
Coalition with multiple of the above
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The project Zagreb for Me was launched by the Zagreb Society of Architects and the Faculty of Architecture at the University of Zagreb. It was planned to be implemented in collaboration with the City Office responsible for spatial planning and construction and was planned in coordination with the citizens and civic initiative Akupunktura grada. ( Ref 1)
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Regional government
Public sector institution
Non-government organisation/civil society
Researchers/university
Citizens or community group
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
No
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
It was conceptualized to apply the principles of successful bottom-up city revitalisation used in Accupuncture of the city project.
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
Included a network of NGOs, citizens, researchers and city administration in charge of spatial planning. The project also relied on expertise of the youth section of the architects' Association of Croatia which initiated the City Acupuncture project (a separate project).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
87,435 euro (Ref 4)
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
bottom-up approach to revitalisation of the public spaces and citizens engagement in monitoring of the process.
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The project, “Zagreb for Me”, arose from the “bottom-up” project called City Acupuncture. Five years ago, the
Youth Section of the Zagreb Society of Architects began to organise interdisciplinary workshops with the aim to
improve the quality of urban life by making small and precise spatial interventions in some neighbourhoods. In City
Acupuncture, project members initially spent time in the chosen neighbourhood conducting spatial analysis along
with interviewing inhabitants about their opinions. Afterwards, project members developed concepts and picked
precise locations for project implementation. In the end, they held public presentations to discuss all the findings
and proposals. As the work of this group very quickly became well accepted and widely recognized, they managed
to build an international network together with similar initiatives and received funding from the European Union.
The original participatory approach, has served as an inspiration for this project also.
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected impacts are only expected ones, as a result of the originally planned activities. The followings are the detailed description of the expected impacts.
- The quality of open spaces aimed to encourage people to walk or use bicycles. This in turn would have helped to reduce the number of vehicles within the city. Inserting small green areas in the city fabric was expected to improve biodiversity, capture carbon, improve the air quality and decrease the urban heat island (Ref 1).
Description of economic benefits
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected impacts are only expected ones, as a result of the originally planned activities. The followings are the detailed description of the expected impacts.
- If completed, the "City of Zagreb and its citizens would get contemporary public spaces similar to those we recognize and admire in all European and world metropolises". The project was expected to promote the city and make it more attractive for living, studying and work, visiting and doing business. Positive economic impacts were also expected to be seen at the level of small and medium enterprises (Ref 1).
Please specify other environmental justice issue
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected options are only planned and expected ones.
Description of social and cultural benefits
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected impacts are only expected ones, as a result of the originally planned activities. The followings are the detailed description of the expected impacts.
- Social development was expected to achieve through participation in decision-making, cohesion, innovation and a professional approach. The acceptance of the city as “home” and improving citizens’ relation to public spaces as their personal ones was also an expected output of the project. the implementation of this project was expected to bring a positive atmosphere back to the city and to promote spending time on public spaces, which might have resulted in an increase of social interactions and health benefits (e.g. walking, recreation) (Ref 1, 3).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
unknown
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Please specify other method used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
The project was planned but cancelled. All the above-selected impacts are the expected ones. No actual results were to be reported.
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of July 2020.
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
The project was planned but cancelled. Citizens were initially involved in the process of planning only.
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
No
Please specify
The project was planned but cancelled. Citizens were initially involved in the process of planning only.
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. JOANNEUM RESEARCH – LIFE: Centre for Climate, Energy & Society (2016) Pocacito. Available at: http://pocacito.eu/sites/default/files/Zagrebforme_Zagreb.pdf. Accessed on 16th July, 2020.
2. Pogledaj to (2016) Natjecaj za uređenje ulice Ljerke Šram. Available at: http://pogledaj.to/arhitektura/natjecaj-za-uredenje-ulice-ljerke-sram/. Accessed on 16th July, 2020.
3. DAZ (2016) Zagreb za mene. Available at: http://zagrebzamene.d-a-z.hr/daz/. Accessed on 16th July, 2020.
4. Urbact (2017) Revitalization of public spaces. Available at: https://urbact.eu/revitalisation-public-spaces. Accessed on 24th July, 2020.
5. Pogledaj. (2018) Public space planning in Croatia- Can it be otherwise. Available at: http://pogledaj.to/prostor/planiranje-javnih-prostora-u-hrvatskoj-moze-li-drukcije/. Accessed on 24th July, 2020.
Comments and notes
Comments
Two pilot subprojects are part of the process. One is the Think Space program, which in 2015 organised a competition to seek out solutions for present-day public spaces on conceptual and theoretical levels. The other subproject, Savica, will be the first competition to be held and realized in order to test the whole “Zagreb for Me” methodology. The Zagreb for Me project is not finished yet, but so far it has received a lot of praise. It definitely shows that citizens are very much interested in participating in city planning. In addition, it is an example of how much a small ”bottom-up” initiative, City Acupuncture, can grow and instigate a serious city project (Ref 1).