1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Beira
Region
Africa
Short description of the intervention
The Green Urban Infrastructure in the municipality of Beira project aims to increase Beira’s resilience to climate change and flooding (Ref. 2). It is a two-part project that consists of rehabilitating the Chiveve River and constructing a public park along the river (Ref. 1). The river rehabilitation was completed at the end of 2016 and restored the natural flow of the river, enabling better flood control (Ref. 5,6). The public park was completed at the end of 2020 and serves as a recreation, catchment and overflow area through three basins of the river (Ref. 1,2).
Address

Beira
Mozambique

Area boundary
POINT (34.835468 -19.82599)
POINT (34.834395 -19.826515)
POINT (34.837271 -19.834387)
POINT (34.846026 -19.841209)
POINT (34.848429 -19.839715)
POINT (34.847699 -19.83584)
POINT (34.84285 -19.835679)
NBS area image
Source of NBS area image
Ref. 6, Ref. 8
Total area
45000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2012
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2015
End date of the intervention
2020
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
The Green Urban Infrastructure project in the municipality of Beira project aims to:
- Improve natural drainage and retention (Ref. 2,6)
- Increase Beira’s resilience to climate change (Ref. 2)
- Protect the city centre from flooding caused by heavy rain and tidal waves (Ref. 1,2)
- Restore the riverine and wetland ecosystem (Ref. 6)
- Improve living conditions for the inhabitants of Beira, especially within the poor informal community of Goto, which is vulnerable to the effects of climate change (Ref. 1)
Quantitative targets
Phase I:
- Preservation of at least 1 line of mangrove trees along the margin of the river (Ref. 6)
- Plant 2,200 mangrove trees and guarantee their survival for the first two vegetation periods (Ref. 6)
Monitoring indicators defined
Recording of precipitation and Chiveve Water Levels (Ref. 6)
# of plants planted (Ref. 6)
# of plants survived (Ref. 6)
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
Phase I: River Rehabilitation
- Opening the river & connecting it to the estuary (Ref. 6)
- Dredging of Chiveve riverbed at fishing port (Ref. 1,11)
- Clearing of waste and sediments in shoreline vegetation (Ref. 1,5,6)
- Restoration of riverine and wetland ecosystem (Ref. 5,6,11)
- Mangrove reforestation (Ref. 1,6,11)

Phase II: Public Park
- Construction of a public park that extends through three basins of the river (Ref. 1,2)
- Establishment of new urban park administration (Ref. 1)
- Planting of native species (Ref. 1)
- Planting of over 7000 trees (Ref. 4)
- Establishment of the botanical garden (Ref. 1,4,5)
- Installation of panels along park pathways that provide information about the park’s ecosystem and how to protect it (Ref. 1)
- Wetland restoration (Ref. 1,4,11)
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Grey infrastructure featuring greens
Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Parks and urban forests
Large urban parks or forests
Blue infrastructure
Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Coastal wetland, mangroves and salt marshes
Green areas for water management
Sustainable urban drainage systems
What is the level of innovation / development of the NBS related to water management?
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
7000 (Ref. 4)
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Regulating services
Local climate regulation (temperature reduction)
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Cultural services
Aesthetic appreciation
Recreation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Social and community interactions
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Citizens or community groups
Financial institution (e.g. bank, insurer, pension fund)
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
AIAS (National Administration of Water and Sanitation Infrastructure): implementing agency (Ref. 6)
Beira Municipality: project operator (Ref. 6)
KfW: co-finance for Phase I & II of the project (Ref. 5,6)
World Bank: co-finance for Phase II of the project (Ref. 1,2,5,6)
CES/ Inros Lackner; TPF Consultores; CHICO Construction: Private Sector Consultants (Ref. 6)
ADEL: local NGO for reforestation measures (Ref. 5,6)
Citizens: involvement in decisions affecting the park, including deciding park logo (Ref. 1)
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Multilateral organisation
National government
Local government/municipality
Non-government organisation/civil society
Private sector/corporate actor/company
Financial institution
Citizens or community group
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Yes
Please specify the "local regulation/strategy/plan"
Beira’s Masterplan 2015-2035 (for river rehabilitation) (Ref. 11)
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
World Bank IDA through its Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (Ref. 1), under the Strategic Climate Fund (Ref. 6)
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Yes
Co-governance arrangement
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
30 000 000 euros (Ref. 6)
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Total: 30 000 000 euros (Ref. 6)
Phase I: ~13 million euros (Ref. 11)
Phase II: ~17 million euros (Ref. 2, 6, 10)
Non-financial contribution
No
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify technological innovation
‘When looking at flood and erosion protection infrastructure the use of nature-based solutions is still a new concept’ (Ref. 6)
‘The first green infrastructure development of its kind, in the city of Beira’ (Ref. 9)
Please specify social innovation
Governance: ‘One of the first nature-based urban flood management projects supported by the World Bank’ (Ref. 11); The project is ‘in their approach and scale so far unique in the Mozambican context of infrastructure investments for flood protection’ (Ref. 6); Establishment of independent municipal park administration with funding from KfW and World Bank to ensure sustainability and long-term management of project (Ref. 1)
Cultural: Creation of recreation areas for local citizens (Ref. 1,2,5,8,11)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
Unknown
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
There is potential to replicate/ transfer the initiative (at the very least, lessons learned from the initiative) to other cities in Mozambique, including Nacala and Quelimane (Ref. 5).
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
Achieved Impacts:
- Restoration of the river to natural function as a tidal river (Ref. 1)
- Improved river flow to protect the city from flooding (Ref. 1)
- Less flooding (Ref. 4,6) – during a ‘one-in-ten-year’ rainfall event in 2017 and a ‘one-in-50-year flood’ in 2019, the project area did not have any major flooding; when Cyclone Idai struck in 2019, the project area received less flooding than other parts of the country (Ref. 11)
- Improved drainage (Ref. 6)
- Ecosystem restoration via mangrove reforestation in Phase II (unsuccessful in Phase I) (Ref. 6)
- Increased ecological connectivity by connecting river and estuary (Ref. 6)
- Increased biodiversity – establishment of shrubs, one of which is an edible plant species (Ref. 6); planting of over 7000 trees (Ref. 4)

Expected Impacts:
- Lowering temperatures (Ref. 6)
- Filtering air and rainwater (Ref. 6)
Description of economic benefits
Achieved Impacts:
- Creation of new jobs (Ref. 1,6)
- Creation of additional income for the city (Ref. 1)

Expected Impacts:
- Improved mobility of fishing vessels (Ref. 1, 6)
Description of social and cultural benefits
Achieved Impacts:
- Improved participation in public life, via involvement through cultural, social and sporting events (Ref. 1,6)
- Improved cleanliness (Ref. 6)
- Decline of robberies, rape and thefts in the area (Ref. 6)
- Improved security in the area (Ref. 6)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Environmental: water levels (Ref. 6,11)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
Yes
Please specify the negative impacts
There were some negative feedback registered from merchants previously selling in informal market & car wash businesses next to the river, since they had to be moved during construction works (Ref. 6)
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown (as of Sept. 2021)
Methods of impact monitoring
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
- Climate Change Assessment (Ref. 6)
- Hydrological Analysis (Ref. 6)
- Run-off and Flood Modeling (Ref. 6)
- Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (Ref. 6)
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
Yes
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
Documents relevant to the intervention
Attachment Size
Ref. 1 (218.26 KB) 218.26 KB
Ref. 2 (340.74 KB) 340.74 KB
Ref. 5 (7.11 MB) 7.11 MB
Ref. 6 (7.51 MB) 7.51 MB
Ref. 11 (1.85 MB) 1.85 MB
List of references
1. KfW Development Bank. (2021). Project information: Urban development – Mozambique. KfW Development Bank. Retrieved from: https://www.kfw-entwicklungsbank.de/PDF/Entwicklungsfinanzierung/Projektinformationen/Subsahara-Afrika/2021_Projektinformation_Mosambik_Stadtentwicklung_EN.pdf [Document provided].
2. TPF Consultores. (n.d.). Green Infrastructure Park in Beira City. TPF Consultores. Retrieved from: https://www.tpf.pt/en/green-infrastructure-park-in-beira-city-c-2071-5-206-45-110-6.html [Document provided].
3. World Bank Group (WBG). (n.d.). Cities and Climate Change. WBG. Available at: https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P123201 [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
4. World Bank Group (WBG). (2018). Helping Mozambique Cities Build Resilience to Climate Change. WBG. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/06/05/helping-mozambique-cities-build-resilience-to-climate-change [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
5. CES Consulting Engineers Salzgitter GmbH and Inros Lackner SE (CES). (2020a). Task 5 – Knowledge Note: Upscaling Nature-Based Flood Protection in Mozambique’s Cities. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Upscaling-Nature-Based-Flood-Protection-in-Mozambique-s-Cities-Knowledge-Note.pdf [Document provided].
6. CES Consulting Engineers Salzgitter GmbH and Inros Lackner SE (CES). (2020b). Task 1 – Lessons Learnt from Beira: Upscaling Nature-Based Flood Protection in Mozambique’s Cities. Retrieved from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/969931585303089862/pdf/Lessons-Learnt-from-Beira.pdf [Document provided].
7. KfW Development Bank. (2016). Mozambique: Rehabilitation of the Chiveve River is improving the quality of life of Beira’s residents. URBANET. Available at: https://www.urbanet.info/river-rehabilitation-mozambique/ [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
8. Earthworks Landscape Architects. (2017). Chiveve River Beira Mozambique. Earthworks Landscape Architects. Available at: https://www.elastudio.co.za/project/chiveve-river-beira-mozambique/ [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
9. Carvalho, R. (2020). Mozambique inaugurates largest urban park in Africa. Further Africa. Available at: https://furtherafrica.com/2020/12/20/mozambique-inaugurates-largest-urban-park-in-africa/ [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
10. Club of Mozambique. (2020). Mozambique: Nyusi inaugurates Beira Green Park – Watch. Club of Mozambique. Available at: https://clubofmozambique.com/news/mozambique-nyusi-inaugurates-beira-green-park-watch-180545/ [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
11. Dicker, S, Unsworth, S, Byrnes, R. & Ward, B. (2021). Saving lives and livelihoods: The benefits of investments in climate change adaptation and resilience. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. [Document provided].
12. Infraestruturas Verdes Urbanas – Beira. (2021). Facebook page. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/Infraestruturas-Verdes-Urbanas-Beira-104123950929813/ [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
13. Empresa Municipal Do Rio Chiveve. (2021). Facebook page. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/emrichbeira/?hc_ref=ARRcSJLg6IIjV56qISWcb_NoatEJfdsYfMA1G8TpIevjrS0nKFddIY7PQVOVHlmB-oU&ref=nf_target&__tn__=kC-R [Accessed: 9 September 2021].
14. ADEL Sofala. (2020). Facebook post. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=4007694459302548&id=1619278224810862&comment_id=4019717874766873&reply_comment_id=4073391462732847 [Accessed: 11 September 2021].
Comments and notes
Additional insights
The project was not initially a GI project, especially in the early planning stages for Phase I. The need for incorporating NBS/ GI came later on in the process. Overall, the project is a mixed green-grey infrastructure project. (Ref. 6)
Public Images
Image
Beira Urban Park 1
Beira Urban Park 1
Source: Ref. 9
Image
Beira Urban Park 2
Beira Urban Park 2
Source: Ref. 10
Image
Beira Urban Park 3
Source: Ref. 10
Image
ADEL Chiveve River Planting 1
Source: Ref. 14
Image
ADEL Chiveve River Planting 2
Source: Ref. 14
Image
ADEL Chiveve River Planting 3
Source: Ref. 14