1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Mobile (FUA)
Region
Northern America
Short description of the intervention
Launched in 2022, the Murphy High School Farm-to-Table Program in Mobile is an initiative aimed at addressing urban food deserts and promoting community health through education and sustainable farming practices [Ref 1; Ref 4]. Funded by Spire as part of its “Connected Through Cooking” initiative, the program transforms 28 acres of school grounds into a teaching farm where students learn to grow and cook nutritious food [Ref 1; Ref 6].
The project integrates science, math, and culinary arts into hands-on learning, engaging students in planning, planting, and harvesting crops, as well as developing healthy recipes [Ref 1; Ref 4]. Activities include constructing greenhouses, building raised beds, and installing irrigation systems—33 raised beds and an 800 sq. ft. greenhouse were completed in the first year [Ref 1; Ref 2]. The program also supports nearby food-insecure neighbourhoods by distributing produce and recipe tips, helping address poor access to fresh food in Mobile [Ref 3; Ref 4]. Younger students from local schools are included through farm-based learning, broadening the program’s educational reach [Ref 1; Ref 5].
Key actors include Murphy educators, Spire staff, and community partners such as Jones Valley Teaching Farm and Auburn University [Ref 4]. Outcomes include improved STEM education, increased food literacy, and stronger community ties through urban agriculture [Ref 1; Ref 4].
Implementation area characterization
Address

100 S Carlen St, Mobile
Mobile, 36606
United States

Area boundary (map-based)
Area description
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
School
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2022
End date of the intervention
2022
Present stage of the intervention
Objectives of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
-Create a hands-on teaching farm for students of all grade levels (high school, middle school, and elementary) [Ref 4]
-Teach students about sustainability, healthy living, and cooking with local, sustainable foods through integrated lessons in science, math, and culinary arts. [Ref 4]
-Combat food deserts in Mobile by providing access to fresh, locally grown produce and healthy recipes to underserved communities. [Ref 3; Ref 4; Ref 6]
-Improve nutritional education and awareness among students and the broader community, particularly around growing and preparing healthy foods.[Ref 1; Ref 2; Ref 4]
-Foster cross-disciplinary learning that connects food production with STEM and culinary subjects, offering immersive, career-relevant educational experiences.[Ref 1; Ref 4]
-Provide students with the tools to grow food in limited spaces, supporting future self-sufficiency even in urban or apartment living environments.[Ref 6]
-Expand the program’s reach and impact through collaboration with local schools and educational partners. [Ref 1; Ref 5]
Implementation activities and NBS focus
Implementation activities
-Built raised garden beds for growing a variety of fruits and vegetables [Ref 2].
-Constructed an 800 sq. ft. greenhouse to support year-round planting [Ref 1].
-Planted 20 blueberry bushes, 2 blackberry bushes, and multiple fruit trees including persimmon, loquat, fig, orange, and grapefruit [Ref 1; Ref 2].
-Created an outdoor teaching area with benches for student instruction [Ref 1].
-Installed irrigation hoses to support plant growth across all beds [Ref 2].
-Built 10 seed-growing tables and 2 planting tables for indoor and greenhouse planting [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Designed and constructed a shared house to distribute extra produce to the community [Ref 2].
-Constructed a metal tool shed for equipment storage, built by students [Ref 1].
-Developed a “trap garden” to naturally attract pests away from crops [Ref 4].
-Integrated farm-based activities into math, science, and culinary classes, including recipe development and engineering garden layouts [Ref 1; Ref 5].
-Launched a new "Introduction to Plant Biotechnology" class aligned with the farm curriculum [Ref 4].
-Collaborated with external partners like Jones Valley Teaching Farm and Auburn University for best practices and educational support [Ref 4].
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Community gardens and allotments
Community gardens
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Medicinal resources
Cultural services
Recreation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Physical and experiential interactions with plants and animals
Scale
Spatial scale
Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Beneficiaries
Demographics in implementation area
-Racial Composition: The student body at Murphy High School is predominantly African American, comprising approximately 75% of the student population. White students make up about 18%, with Hispanic, Asian, and multiracial students accounting for the remaining percentages.
Niche
-Economic Indicators: Around 66% of Murphy High School students are considered economically disadvantaged, qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch programs. This suggests that the surrounding community faces economic challenges, with household incomes likely below the national median.
-Household Characteristics: In the broader Midtown Mobile area, the median household income is approximately $51,090. The area has a mix of homeowners and renters, with a significant portion of residents living in rental properties.
-Educational Attainment: About 36.3% of residents in the Midtown area have attained a college degree, indicating a community with a moderate level of higher education achievemen
Socio-economic profile of the area
Communities vulnerable to environmental hazards or climate change impacts
Unknown
Non-government actors
Private sector/Corporate/Business
Other
Please specify "other primary beneficiary"
Students
Specify primary beneficiaries
-Murphy High School students – All students at Murphy benefit directly through hands-on learning in science, math, and culinary arts, access to fresh produce, and participation in sustainability education [Ref 1; Ref 4; Ref 6].
-Students from nearby schools – Elementary students from Council Traditional School and middle schoolers from Phillips Preparatory School participate in field trips and hands-on farm activities [Ref 1; Ref 5].
-The surrounding community – Residents in nearby food desert communities benefit from access to fresh produce and healthy recipes provided through the farm's outreach efforts [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Families of participating students – Students take home produce and recipes to share with their families, extending nutritional benefits beyond the classroom [Ref 4].
-Educators and school staff – Teachers gain a cross-curricular platform for delivering STEM and health-focused content, enhancing their instructional tools and professional engagement [Ref 1; Ref 4].
Other beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Please specify other non-government actors involved
High school
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The initiative was initiated and primarily funded by Spire, a private energy company, through its Connected Through Cooking community initiative [Ref 1; Ref 4; Ref 6].
While the program is implemented at Murphy High School (a public institution under the Mobile County Public School System), the vision, funding, construction support, and curriculum development were significantly driven by Spire and its partners [Ref 1; Ref 4].
The program also involves collaborations with non-governmental educational and agricultural organizations, such as Jones Valley Teaching Farm, Auburn University’s Horticulture Department, and the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future [Ref 4].
Key actors - initiating organization
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Public sector institution
Non-government organisation/civil society
Other
Please specify other Key actors - Other stakeholders involved
High school
Uncommon actors ("Missing actors")
Land owners
Please specify other landowner
High school
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to a Regional Directive/Strategy
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
Unknown
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers & Barriers
Please provide details (e.g, name of the plan or strategy) for the selected policies or initiatives.
Capacity-building projects
The program integrates hands-on STEM and culinary education, directly enhancing students’ knowledge and skills in sustainability, agriculture, and nutrition [Ref 1; Ref 4].

- Governance innovations (such as public-private partnerships) - The initiative is a clear example of a public-private partnership between Spire (a private energy company) and Murphy High School (a public institution) [Ref 1; Ref 4; Ref 6].
- Change agents (individual with major role influence on launching) - The project was envisioned by Murphy educators, notably Rebecca Mullins, who played a key role in launching the initiative, and was made possible with major support from Spire representatives like Joe Hampton [Ref 1; Ref 6].
- Collaboration with other projects that implemented NBS - The program collaborated with the Jones Valley Teaching Farm in Birmingham, which provided educational resources and best practices from its own successful farm-based education model [Ref 4].
- Funds, subsidies or investment for GI/NBS in the city: The program was enabled by a $35,000 investment from Spire, which funded infrastructure and curriculum development [Ref 6].
Barriers
Unknwon
Financing
Please specify total cost (EUR)
€32,200 ($35,000)
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
€32,200
Source(s) of funding
Type of fund(s) used
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Co-finance for NBS
No
Entrepreneurship opportunities
No
Business models
Business models
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Impacts, benefits
Please specify other economic impact
- Skill-building for future employment,
Description of environmental benefits
-Expected reduced emissions: Reduction in food miles and associated emissions, by growing and distributing produce locally within Mobile’s food desert communities [Ref 4]. Use of solar-powered pumps for fertilizer distribution, demonstrating clean energy integration in farming practices [Ref 1].
-Expected improved soil quality: Soil health and ecological benefits through organic practices, such as using solar-powered pumps and creating a trap garden to control pests naturally without chemicals [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Achieved increased green space area & Achieved increased number of species present: Urban greening and biodiversity support, via planting of fruit trees, blueberries, and diverse garden crops [Ref 1]. Construction of 34 raised garden beds and planting of over 20 blueberry bushes, 6 fruit trees, and other crops, which has directly increased green space on the school grounds [Ref 1; Ref 2].
-Achieved improved prevention or control of invasive alien species: Creation of a trap garden for ecological pest control, avoiding the use of toxic chemicals [Ref 4].
Description of economic benefits
- Skill-building for future employment, especially in agriculture, culinary arts, and STEM fields, creating long-term economic opportunities for students [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Achieved generation of other type of work opportunities (e.g. voluntary, work for rehabilitation): Hands-on vocational training for students in farming, culinary arts, and plant biotechnology, providing pathways to employment or further education [Ref 1; Ref 4; Ref 5]. In-kind volunteer labor and community engagement contributed by Spire employees, reducing labor costs while fostering economic collaboration [Ref 1; Ref 2].
Description of social and cultural benefits
-Expected improved social cohesion: Enhanced community cohesion by engaging students, families, alumni, and neighbors in a shared space for learning, gardening, and healthy eating [Ref 4].
-Expected improved physical health: Improved health awareness and dietary habits through access to nutritional education and fresh, local produce [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Expected promotion of cultural diversity: -Revival of local food traditions and cultural identity, by teaching cooking skills rooted in the community's heritage and involving students in recipe development [Ref 1; Ref 4].
-Expected increased sustainability of agriculture practices &Expected increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces: Empowerment of underserved populations, particularly students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, by equipping them with life skills and food autonomy [Ref 4; Ref 6]. Engagement of community members and alumni in maintaining the garden, fostering a sense of ownership and pride in the shared space [Ref 4].
-Achieved increased access to healthy/affordable food: Improved local food production capacity through small-impact, sustainable farming methods, helping reduce dependency on external food supply chains [Ref 4]. Local produce shared with nearby food desert communities, contributing to sustainable urban food systems and reducing the carbon footprint of food transport [Ref 1].
-Achieved increased knowledge of locals about local nature: & Achieved increased support for education and scientific research: Increased environmental awareness and education, fostering sustainable habits and ecological literacy among students and the community [Ref 4]. Active participation from students across disciplines, including science, math, and culinary arts, creating a hands-on, inclusive learning environment [Ref 1; Ref 4]. Student-led building and farming activities, boosting confidence, teamwork, and leadership among participants [Ref 1; Ref 6].
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Type of indicators
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Cost-benefit analysis
Unknown
Justice
High-quality & Transformative NBS
Multiple impacts delivery (climate, biodiversity, just community)
Yes
Goal setting and impacts delivery
No, although benefits were delivered in all the 3 key areas, but in the planning phase, the project did not aim to address issues in all the 3 key priority areas.
Reaching original project goals
Long-term perspective
Yes
Cost-effective solutions
Yes
Application of lessons learned
Perception of Environmental Change
Unknown
References
1.
Spire (n.d.). Murphy High School Farm-to-Table program connects food, farming and the culinary arts. [Source link] [Archive];
2.
Spire (n.d.). Community gardens at Murphy High School cultivate teamwork, nutrition awareness and community impact. [Source link] [Archive];
3.
Facebook page (n.d.). Murphy Farm to Table. [Source link] [Archive];
4.
Spire (n.d.). Murphy High School Farm To Table. [Source link] [Archive];
5.
FOX News (2022). Murphy HS students to get hands-on farming lesson with Farm to Table program. [Source link] [Archive];
6.
NBC 15 News (2022). Murphy HS gifted $35,000 for Farm-to-Table program. [Source link] [Archive];
Comments and notes
Public Images
Image
Murphy Farm to Table
Murphy Farm to Table
Facebook page: Murphy Farm to Table
Image
Murphy Farm to Table
Murphy Farm to Table
Facebook page: Murphy Farm to Table
Image
Murphy Farm to Table
Murphy Farm to Table
Facebook page: Murphy Farm to Table
Image
Murphy Farm to Table
Murphy Farm to Table
Facebook page: Murphy Farm to Table