1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Tegucigalpa
Region
Latin America and the Caribbean
Short description of the intervention
The Central Forest Corridor surrounds the capital of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, and provides various ecosystem services to the population, with a particular emphasis on providing water for communities within both the corridor and Tegucigalpa (Ref. 3). However, limited access to water is common across Honduras, attributed to the degradation of watersheds as a result of deforestation and pollution of both ground and surface water (Ref. 1). Climate scenarios further "indicate that existing water scarcity will be exacerbated by climate change and increasing variability"... with "the main urban areas (Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula) and several agricultural areas (Patuca basin)...fac[ing] increased water scarcity in the near future" (Ref. 1).
Address

Tegucigalpa
Honduras

Total area
186525000.00m²
Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Please specify “other type of area” before implementation of the NBS
The intervention concerns the Central Forest Corridor, which comprises 14 municipalities, five protected areas, five sub-watersheds, 50 micro-watersheds, 66 areas for forest use, agricultural crops areas, and urbanised and industrialised areas (Ref. 2).
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
2017
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2019
End date of the intervention
2023
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
"The main objective of the project is to increase climate resilience of the most vulnerable communities in the Central Forest Corridor and the adaptation capacity of its municipalities with emphasis on securing livelihoods and the continued provision of ecosystem goods and services for Tegucigalpa and surroundings".
In order to safeguard the water supplies of Tegucigalpa City and surrounding areas, the project aims to "work to strengthen sustainable land-use practices piloted in the highland watersheds and green belt around Tegucigalpa and instituting financial mechanisms that assist in managing water supply and demand" (Ref. 1).
As highlighted by Ref. 4, the intervention is aligned with three of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
1. Build resilience of the poor to climate (SDG 1.5);
2. Integrate climate change into national policies, and planning (SDG 13.2); and
3. Improve learning and capacity on climate change measures (SDG 13.3).
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
The execution of the project is to be monitored annually and evaluated periodically, according to Ref. 3. The third component of the project, 'Strengthening knowledge, information management, and monitoring systems on climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity', specifically promotes monitoring of the CFC's vulnerability to, and resilience to, climate change as a whole (Refs. 1, 2 & 3). However, it is unclear whether monitoring activities/indicators were defined specifically in relation to the nature-based solution aspects of the project, i.e. those which sit under the second project component, pertaining to on-the-ground adaptation measures, prior to project inception.
Climate change adaptation: What were the goals of the NBS?
What types of restoration goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
What activities are implemented to realize the restoration goals and targets?
Implementation activities
To address the above sustainability challenges, the following implementation activities have been outlined for the project:
- Restoration of 1,000 ha of pine forest in the CBC, with the areas to be restored being defined by the municipalities within the CBC, and taking into consideration climate change and climate variability (Ref. 3) / "Pine and Mixed Forest areas damaged by drought-induced pest and fire hazards are reforested" (Ref. 2);
- Strategic restoration of forest areas by natural regeneration through effective mechanisms for protection against fires, pests and land-use change, in order to "reduce the incidence of fires, pests, diseases and illegal logging, thus avoiding land-use change", and further taking into account "management of the bark beetle pest...[and] the repercussions of prolonged periods of drought due to climate change and climate variability" (Ref. 3).
- "Drought management adaptation measures implemented to optimize the use of water resources for agriculture and domestic use" (Ref. 2).
- It is a largely "multi-disciplinary and integrated approach, [with] thousands of hectares of forest...being restored [and] agroecological water management practices for farming...being promoted" (Ref. 6). It additionally intends to "train...decision-makers and resource users to better understand the projected impacts of climate change and provid[e] them with the knowledge to identify effective options for reducing climatic risks and vulnerability" (Ref. 1).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Parks and urban forests
Green corridors and green belts
Vegetation Type
Amenities offered by the NBS
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Raw materials
Water (surface and ground water for drinking and non-drinking purposes)
Regulating services
Flood regulation
Water purification / filtration
Habitat and supporting services
Pest and disease control
Scale
Spatial scale
Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Non-government actors
Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
Researchers, university
Coalition with multiple of the above
Other
Please specify other non-government actors involved
The United Nations is considered an intergovernmental organisation.
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The United Nations Development Programme are considered the implementing entity of the project, and the Ministry of Energy, Natural Resources and Environment, is the executing entity (Ref. 1). As considered by Ref. 3, other stakeholders, and the roles they hold, comprise:
- 14 municipalities: presentation of the project, coordination of project activities such as workshops and forums, and provision of technical support during "Letters of Agreement" (LoA) process;
- Forest Conservation Institute (ICF): technical support during LoA process;
- National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH): Technical support during LoA process; and
- National Observatory of Climate Change for Sustainable Development(ONCCDS): Technical support during LoA process.

The Project Management Unit, Project Coordination Office (OCP-MiAmbiente+), the National Directorate
of Climate Change (DNCC-MiAmbiente+), and the General Directorate of Water Resources (DGRHMiAmbiente+) were further responsible for developing the annual operational plan (Ref. 3).
Key actors - initiating organization
Land owners
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
National government
Regional government
Local government/municipality
Citizens or community group
Researchers/university
Multilateral organisation
Land owners
Participatory methods/forms of community involvement used
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
Unknown
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Unknown
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Unknown
Co-finance for NBS
No
Co-financing governance arrangements
No
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
The project as a whole has received a total grant of 4,379,700 USD (4,206,920.84 EUR (1.04 USD = 1 EUR)) from the Adaptation Fund (Ref. 1). This figure is the sum of the following components (Ref. 1):
- Project Component 1: Strengthening of local and community governance for climate resilience: US$ 472,513;
- Project Component 2: On the ground adaptation measures for forest, land and water resources management: US$ 2,750,500;
- Project Component 3: Strengthening knowledge, information management, and monitoring systems on climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity: US$ 431,775;
- Project execution cost: US$ 381,802;
- Total project cost: US$ 4,036,590; and
- Implementing Entity Project Cycle Management Fee: US$ 343,110.
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Type of innovation
Please specify social innovation
This project can largely be classified as a governance innovation, as it intends to "increase resilience to climate change and water-related risks...through pilot activities and an overarching intervention to mainstream climate change considerations into water sector policies" (Ref. 1)
Novelty level of the innovation
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
No information has been provided on whether this innovation has been derived from a previous initiative.
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
No information has been provided on whether this innovation has been, or will be, transferred to a new initiative.
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
The following environmental impacts are expected to occur as a result of the project:
- increased planting of climate-resilient plant varieties (Ref. 2);
- improved water regulation and erosion control (with impacts on year-round supply of high quality water, management of flooding, reduced soil erosion), "It is expected that the reforested areas will reduce climate related risks and impacts, including protection against soil erosion and landslides (caused by intense precipitation), and regulation of water flows (enhanced retention of runoff) through enhanced land coverage, as well as reducing drought related vulnerabilities in water supply through the watershed regulation functions" (Ref. 2);
- improved local climate regulation (temperature, wind breaking, rainfall patterns) (Ref. 2);
- increased carbon sequestration (Ref. 2);
- disease regulation (of forest) through "using more resilient agricultural crop varieties and applying water adaptation measures, along with biological agro-pesticides...[to] enhance the plant's resilience to diseases" (Ref. 2); and
- increased provision of supporting ecosystem services, as the project will "support soil formation, nutrient cycling and primary biomass production principally through the forest restoration and conservation measures, as well as through the adaptive agriculture practices that will enhance soil and water conservation" (Ref. 2).
Description of economic benefits
The following economic impacts are expected to occur as a result of the project:
- specific activities which support adaptive agroforestry and silvopastoral measures "will enhance forest coverage and diversity as a means to help adapting food production to extreme drought and precipitation conditions" (Ref. 2), thereby protecting livelihoods; and
- provision of fuelwood and potential for extraction of other prime materials (Ref. 2);
- increased recreation, ecotourism, and aesthetic appeal (Ref. 2).
Description of social and cultural benefits
The following social and cultural impacts are expected to occur as a result of the project:
- specific activities which support adaptive agroforestry and silvopastoral measures "will enhance forest coverage and diversity as a means to help adapting food production to extreme drought and precipitation conditions" (Ref. 2);
- provision of fuelwood and potential for extraction of other prime materials (Ref. 2);
- disease regulation of the forest through "using more resilient agricultural crop varieties and applying water adaptation measures, along with biological agro-pesticides...[to] enhance the plant's resilience to diseases" (Ref. 2), thus supporting livelihoods;
- increased recreation, ecotourism, and aesthetic appeal (Ref. 2);
- increased spiritual and religious opportunities (Ref. 2);
- increased inspirational opportunities e.g. for artwork (painters, woodcarvers, artisans, photographers) (Ref. 2); and
- increased educational opportunities for school children and the general public (Ref. 2).
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Unknown.
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
It appears that the covid-19 pandemic did not affect the project very significantly, as reported by Ref. 6:
"But even in the face of the pandemic, the AF-funded project, “Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa,” sustains climate resilience activities.
“Covid-19 put us on mobility restraints but forest and water management cannot be stopped – water [availability]and access are even more important when human health is at risk,” said Evelyn Rodriguez, climate change adaptation specialist in the project’s unit for UNDP.

“It was wonderful to see how the technical staff, implementing partners, researchers and beneficiaries adapted to continue working to ensure water provision and supply of ecosystems’ goods and services in the Central Forest Corridor communities.”"
Methods of impact monitoring
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
Yes
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown.
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
Yes
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. Adaptation Fund (n.d.). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa. Washington DC: Adaptation Fund. https://www.adaptation-fund.org/project/ecosystem-based-adaptation-communities-central-forest-corridor-tegucigalpa/;
2. Adaptation Fund (n.d.). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa: PROJECT/PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND. Washington DC: Adaptation Fund. https://www.adaptation-fund.org/projects-document-view/?URL=en/916271538084323449/4137-5839-AF-Honduras-Project-Proposal-Resubmission-03Feb2017-clean.pdf;
3. Adaptation Fund (n.d.). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa: Project Inception Report. Washington DC: Adaptation Fund. https://www.adaptation-fund.org/projects-document-view/?URL=en/381321576255858507/4137-5839-AF-Honduras-Inception-Report-Dec-2019.pdf;
4. United Nations Development Programme Open Planet (n.d.). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa. New York: United Nations Development Programme Open Planet, Nature, Climate and Energy (NCE) Team. https://www.undpopenplanet.org/projects/Ecosystem-Based_Adaptation_at_Communities_of_the_Central_Forest_Corridor_in_Tegucigalpa/;
5. United Nations Development Programme (n.d.). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation at Communities of the Central Forest Corridor in Tegucigalpa. New York: United Nations Development Programme. http://d-portal.org/q.html?aid=XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00094142;
6. Derler, Z., and Adaptation Fund (2020). Climate Change Adaptation Projects Continue Amid Coronavirus Pandemic. London: Climate Change News. https://www.globalsupportprogramme.org/climate-change-adaptation-projects-continue-amid-coronavirus-pandemic; and
7. The Program on Forests (Profor) (n.d.). In the Face of Climate Change, Investing in Forests Promises to Strengthen Water Supply Resilience in Tegucigalpa. Washington DC: World Bank. https://www.profor.info/content/face-climate-change-investing-forests-promises-strengthen-water-supply-resilience.
Comments and notes
Additional insights
This intervention, therefore, seeks to "increase resilience to climate change and water-related risks...through pilot activities and an overarching intervention to mainstream climate change considerations into water sector policies", and as summarised by Ref. 1, has three main components:
1. Strengthening of local and community governance for climate resilience;
2. On the ground adaptation measures for forest, land and water resources management; and
3. Strengthening knowledge, information management, and monitoring systems on climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity.

It is the second of these components, that concerning pursuit on the ground ecosystem-based adaptation measures, on which this case study will largely focus, and particularly so in light of the benefits which have potential to be offered to the urban population of Tegucigalpa City.

Regarding the urban area of Tegucigalpa City in particular, "almost half the CFC territory belongs to sub-basins that provide more than two thirds of the total water in the capital [Tegucigalpa]", hence the need to work on Ecosystem-Based Adaptation through integrated water resource management has become evident, "recognizing the watersheds, forests and vegetation roles in regulating water flows and providing water to build resilience to climate change" (Ref. 2).

Specifically in relation to Component 2 of the project, 'On the ground adaptation measures for forest, land and water resources management' (Ref. 1), the following quantitative targets have been identified:
- Restoration of 1,000 ha of pine forest in the CBC (Ref. 2);
- Strategic restoration of forest areas by natural regeneration through effective mechanisms for protection against fires, pests and land use change, in order to "reduce the incidence of fires, pests, diseases and illegal logging, thus avoiding
land use change", and further taking into account "management of the bark beetle pest...[and] the repercussions of prolonged periods of drought due to climate change and climate variability" (Ref. 3) / "Protection measures are introduced against fires, pests, land use change, and unsustainable forest use, assisting natural regeneration of forests" (Ref. 2); and
- "Drought management adaptation measures implemented to optimize the use of water resources for agriculture and domestic use" (Ref. 2).
In addition to promoting sustainable management of water resources, the project further seeks to secure provision of further ecosystem goods and services, recognising that "the CFC is under threat of the impacts of climate change as rising temperatures, changes in rainfall patterns, and in the frequency and intensity of extreme events. These have led to drought, water stress, flooding (especially in Central District [Tegucigulpa City]), loss of biodiversity, fire and aggravation of the current plague of the bark beetle", all of which "directly affect the livelihoods of the population, and also the provision of ecosystem services and goods generated in the CFC" (Ref. 2).
The project will additionally "promote the design and implementation of measures and technologies that will reduce the pressure on water consumption and the forests, considering the climatic risks associated to future scenarios of precipitation and temperature change", for example, through promoting development and implementation of Micro Watershed Action Plans (Ref. 3).
Public Images
Image
Location of Central Forest Corridor (CFC) / Corredor Boscosos Central (CBC)
Location of Central Forest Corridor (CFC) / Corredor Boscosos Central (CBC)
https://www.adaptation-fund.org/projects-document-view/?URL=en/916271538084323449/4137-5839-AF-Honduras-Project-Proposal-Resubmission-03Feb2017-clean.pdf