1. General information
Location and description of the intervention
City or FUA
Leipzig
Region
Europe
Native title of the NBS intervention
Annalinde Stadtgarten und Gärtnerei
Short description of the intervention
The ANNALINDE gGmbH operates multifunctional urban agriculture and demonstration projects in the Western part of Leipzig: a community garden, a nursery and a fruit garden on a former train station where the emphasis is on community development and mutual learning processes in addition to food production. This is safeguarded by an events portfolio consisting of garden working days, workshops and collaborations with schools, kindergartens and like-minded organizations. In addition to that, open urban labs are operated for a number of initiatives and projects covering subject areas like urban agriculture, recycling, composting, urban bees, urban resilience and sustainable urban development (1).
Address

Zschochersche Str. 12
04229 Leipzig
Germany

Type of area before implementation of the NBS
Timeline of intervention
Start date of the intervention (planning process)
unknown
Start date of intervention (implementation process)
2011
End date of the intervention
2016
Present stage of the intervention
Goals of the intervention
1. Creating a space for exchange and learning about the local production of food, biological diversity, sustainable consumption, sustainable resources use to foster concepts for the future-oriented neighbourhood and urban development (Ref. 1)
2. Nature, environmental and landscape conservation and protection (Ref. 1 and 9)
3. Increase of citizen engagement for communal and charitable purposes (Ref. 1)
4. Create a place of support for youth and elderly people (Ref. 1)
5. Fostering biodiversity in urban areas (9)
6. Promote local stewardship among citizens (1)
Quantitative targets
Unknown
Monitoring indicators defined
Unknown
Habitats and biodiversity conservation: What types of conservation goals are / were defined for the NBS intervention?
Implementation activities
Since 2011 neighbours and volunteers have turned a brownfield of 2,000 sqm into 50 high beds and greenhouses with vegetables and herbs. Everybody can join the activities like sowing, planting, harvesting, processing and conserving of the vegetables, bee-keeping, poultry raising and the development of new cultivation methods (Ref. 8).
The old nursery Toepel was revived in 2013. On 3 fields over 100 different vegetables, seedlings and fruits are grown in 3 greenhouses, in addition to a herbs garden, eatable hedges, a place for experimentation and 14 bee colonies. 35 consumers and restaurant owners are supplied with the product which is also sold on a weekly market. The nursery is also a training enterprise (Ref. 7).
In 2015 an additional orchard area was added to the project. On a former station, an urban orchard on 3,400 sqm (regional and indigenous fruits) was implemented, complemented by location-adapted wild meadows, grasslands and herbs providing important habitats (Ref. 9).
NBS domain and interventions
Ecological domain(s) where the NBS intervention(s) is/are implemented
Community gardens and allotments
Community gardens
Other
Please specify "other allotments and community gardens"
nursery for urban agriculture (7)
urban orchard meadow (9)
Please specify the number of plots or allotment gardens
50 raised beds
Vegetation Type
Please specify how many trees were planted
Unknown
Please specify other amenities offered by the NBS
car café in the community garden (4)
glass greenhouse (7)
Services
Expected ecosystem services delivered
Provisioning services
Food for human consumption (crops, vegetables)
Regulating services
Pollination
Habitat and supporting services
Habitats for species
Maintenance of genetic diversity
Cultural services
Recreation
Intellectual interactions (scientific and / or educational)
Scale
Spatial scale
Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Beneficiaries
Governance
Governance arrangements
Non-government actors
Non-governmental organisation (NGO) / Civil society / Churches
Please specify the roles of the specific government and non-government actor groups involved in the initiative
The charitable organization ANNALINDE gGmbH has acquired the spaces on which the interventions are implemented. Everything is done in close exchange with residents, neighbours and interested citizens who are not only co-managers of all initiatives, but also participants in workshops or labs and therefore active learners from experiences provided. In addition to that, other institutions are indirectly involved through funding (local government) or cooperation (i.e. schools, kindergardens, civic society movements) (1, 2, 3, 4,6)
Key actors - Other stakeholders involved (besides initiating actors)
Non-government organisation/civil society
Citizens or community group
Policy drivers
NBS intervention implemented in response to an Regional Directive/Strategy
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a national regulations/strategy/plan
No
NBS intervention implemented in response to a local regulation/strategy/plan
No
Mandatory or voluntary intervention
Voluntary (spontaneous)
Enablers
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS vision/strategy/plan - mentioned in connection to the project
No
Presence of specific city-level GI/NBS section/part in a more general plan - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify the general plan with GI/NBS section
The Integrated Urban Development concept for Leipzig ("integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept") also contains the focus area vacant space and environment and provides guidelines for the development of the latter (14).
If there is a relevant strategy or plan, please specify the theme / type of the plan.
Presence of city network or regional partnerships focused on NBS - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
"Leipzig im Wandel" is a city-wide platform for information exchange and making connections with other active, interested citizens that want to transform the city of Leipzig. It actively seeks to connect different actors, such as initiatives, associations or companies. The platform is a project of the Leipzig Agenda 21 and Leipzig Transition Town. It entertains a so-called "garden network" which meets four times a year to drive forward urban greening projects, the Annalinde garden was the last venue for this meeting and its volunteers actively participated (3,12).
The Annalinde GmbH has committed to the standards of Transparency International which is a global network including more than 100 established national chapters and a global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption. It brings people together in a powerful worldwide coalition to end the devastating impact of corruption on men, women and children around the world (5).
Presence of GI / NBS research project - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The last project part, fruit garden is closely connected to the initiative citizen train station Plagwitz. The 13 ha of the former commercial train station are being used for citizen greening initiatives "Gleis-Grün-Zug". Green spaces are reconnected with bicycle and pedestrian lane and citizen-based projects are implemented under the umbrella of a foundation called "Ecken wecken" (Ref. 9).
The former train station is also the focus of a research project on urban vacant space: qualification, recovery and securing open, urban green spaces, commissioned by the Ministry for research on construction and urban space as well as the Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection, Construction and Nuclear power security. In 20 case studies best practices and strategies for (re)developing and recovering open space with a focus on citizen engagement are elaborated (13).
Subsidies/investment for GI / NBS in the city - mentioned in connection to the project
Yes
Please specify
The project received by several awards (donations), like Leipzig's Agenda (21) Award 2014, the UN Decade for Biological Diversity 2014 Award, the "1,000 thanks" award by the one of Leipzig's bank and a regional competition for the protection of the soil issued by the "Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt" and the "Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung" (8, 10, 11). A recent project of the organization which focuses on developing economic opportunities out of urban gardening is funded by the national government under its national strategy for biological diversity (6).
Since 2015 also a tree sponsorship system for the fruit trees was introduced (9).
Co-finance for NBS
Yes
Co-financing governance arrangements
Unknown
Was this co-governance arrangement already in place, or was it set up specifically for this NBS?
Financing
Total cost
What is/was the Cost/Budget (EUR) of the NBS or green infrastructure elements?
Unknown
What are the total amount of expected annual maintenance costs?
Unknown
What is the expected annual maintenance costs of the NBS or GI elements?
Unknown
Please specify cost savings
Unknown
Please specify total cost (EUR)
Unknown
Non-financial contribution
Yes
Type of non-financial contribution
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
Which of the involved actors was motivated by this model?
Please specify social innovation
Based on its manifold ways of involving citizens, both as carriers and supporters of the initiatives, as customers (via the purchase of the weekly fresh vegetable basket or on the weekly markets), as co-creators for innovation in field labs as well as as students who are recipients of knowledge about sustainable development and can learn from professional gardeners, I would consider the initiative as a governance innovation (Ref. 1, 4 and 10).
In addition, the intervention could be a cultural innovation due to the development of an experimental lab which explores which vegetables crops are especially suited for growth in urban environments, how to redevelop deserted open space or the development of energy and resource-saving systems (Ref. 3).
Please specify novelty level of the innovation
The initiative differs from other community garden initiatives through its continuous development and expansion into new areas of the city, adding new project components, such as the orchard in 2015. One of these components is for example the development of an experimental lab which explores which vegetables crops are especially suited for growth in urban environments, how to redevelop deserted open space or the development of energy and resource-saving systems (Ref. 3).
Replicability/Transferability
Please specify Replicability/Transferability
Unknown
Impacts, benefits
Description of environmental benefits
- In the nursery, a nine-part crop rotation is applied in order to protect the fertility of the soil and avoid its exhaustion (7)
- Out of the interventions both the community garden and the orchard meadow was implemented on a derelict area that had industrial use in the past. With the intervention, these areas have been transformed into open green spaces, thus increasing the green coverage of the urban area of Leipzig (8, 9)
- All together with the three interventions, the green area of the city increased with more than 5,400 square meters (Community garden: 2,000 sqr meters, Orchard: 3,400 sqr meters, Nursery: unknown) (7, 8, 9)
- In the nursery, the biological diversity has been increased with the installation of two herb beds and an area for experimenting with special crops, strips of shrubs and flowers as well as edible hedges on the fences (7)
- Through the irregular spread of the fruit trees, interspersed with deadwood and small hedges, rich habitats for flora and fauna as well as microbiotpoes are created with varying water and light conditions. Since the grass is only cut once a year, in most of the periods the high grass and herbs provide additional habitats for insects, birds, reptiles that enhance the resilience of the local ecosystem (9)
- In the nursery, since 2014, more than 14 colonies of the KirschenGarten apiary have found their home (7)
Description of economic benefits
- Over 35 consumers and restaurant owners are supplied with the produce of the nursery weekly via a seasonable vegetable and fruit box. In addition to that, produce is sold on a weekly market during summer (7).
- Raised beds are made of recycled bakery boxes, palettes, rice bags or treta paks, no artificial fertilizer is used for cultivation that supports sustainable agriculture practices(4)
- The nursery is a training company in vegetable growing, a place of work for four federal volunteers, who above all also carry out offers in the field of education, such as guided tours or workshops with school classes on site (7)
Description of social and cultural benefits
- The nursery supplies 80 consumers of a weekly vegetable crate, befriended restaurateurs and our own events with the grown vegetables. In addition to that, produce is sold on a weekly market during summer (7)
- Through community gardening and consumption of local and seasonal food, citizens' awareness of local fruits and vegetables and their cultivation increases (1)
- In the nursery, guided tours and workshops and offered for interested citizens to learn more about urban farming and gardening (1)
Type of reported impacts
Indicators
Number of planted trees
Size of new green areas (7, 8, 9)
Analysis of specific impact categories
Job creation: The NBS created ...
Environmental justice: The implementation of the NBS project resulted in ...
Negative impacts: Did the project cause any problems or concerns?
No information was found regarding negative impacts of the project
COVID-19 pandemic
Unknown as of October of 2020
Methods of impact monitoring
Process of recording NBS impacts
Methods used to evaluate the impacts of NBS
Evidence for use of assessment
Presence of an assessment, evaluation and/or monitoring process
No
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No
Presence of monitoring/evaluation reports
No
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No
Impact assessment mechanism
Name of any specific impact assessment tools
Unknown
Use of GIS in mapping impacts
No evidence in public records
Citizen involvement
Citizens involvement in assessment/evaluation
Yes
Mode(s) of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Please specify other modes of citizen involvement in evaluation/assessment
Citizens have been involved in all stages of the planning until implementation, so there is continuous direct feedback to be drawn from their constant involvement (5, 6).
Citizens involvement in the analysis of the assessment/evaluation
Unknown
Follow-up to the evaluation / assessment
Unknown
References
List of references
1. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2016). Annalinde. Über uns. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/ueber/
2. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2017). Annalinde. Projekte. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/projects/
3. CivixX Werkstatt für and Zivilgesellschaft. (n/a). ANNALINDE Gärtnerei. Accessed on October 12, 2020, https://www.nachhaltiges-leipzig.de/aktivitaet/110-annalinde-gaertnerei/
4. Leipzig Leben. (2016). Stadtgarten Annalinde Leipzig | Urban Gardening. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://www.leipzig-leben.de/stadtgarten-annalinde-leipzig/
5. Transparency International Deutschland e.V. (2017). Initiative Transparente Zivilgesellschaft. Accessed on October 12, 2020, https://www.transparency.de/Initiative-Transparente-Zivilg.1612.0.html
6. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2016). ‘ANNALINDE_Urbane Agrikultur im Leipziger Westen’. Leipzig. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/wordpress_relaunch/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ANNALINDE_Urbane_Agrikultur.pdf
7. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2016). Gärtnerei. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/projects/gaertnerei/
8. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2016). Gemeinschaftsgarten. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/projects/gemeinschaftsgarten/
9. ANNALINDE gGmbH. (2016). Obstgarten. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://annalinde-leipzig.de/projects/obstgarten/
10. CivixX Werkstatt für Zivilgesellschaft. (2017). Leipziger Agenda-Preis 2014 - Die Preisträger. Website not available
11. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. (n/a). ANNALINDE Gärtnerei – Erhaltung des Kulturgutes Stadtgärtnerei durch ökologischen Gartenbau und partizipative Bildungsprojekte. Website not available
12. Gemeinsam Wandeln and Kühn, R. (n/a). Gartennetzwerk. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://www.transitiontown-leipzig.de/arbeitsgruppen/gartennetzwerk
13. Bürgerbahnhof Plagwitz. (n/a). Stiftung ‘Ecken wecken’. URBANE FREIRÄUME - Fallstudie über den Bürgerbahnhof Plagwitz. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://www.buergerbahnhof-plagwitz.de/
14. Stadt Leipzig. (2009) Dezernat Stadtentwicklung und -bau: Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept Leipzig 2020 (SEKo). Leipzig. Accessed on October 12, 2020, http://www.leipzig.de/fileadmin/mediendatenbank/leipzig-de/Stadt/02.6_Dez6_Stadtentwicklung_Bau/61_Stadtplanungsamt/Stadtentwicklung/Stadtentwicklungskonzept/SEKo_Pdfs/SEKo_Integriertes_Stadtentwicklungskonzept_Langfassung_Stand_Mai_2015_reduziert.pdf
Comments and notes
Additional insights
Apart from direct feedback of consumers and customers and the number of vegetables/fruits sold, no particular impact assessment tools are used (Ref. 6, 7, and 8)
Public Images
Image
City and Community Garden Annalinde
City and Community Garden Annalinde
ANNALINDE gGmbH, retrieved 08/13/2018 from Dominik Renner
Image
City and Community Garden Annalinde (2017)
City and Community Garden Annalinde (2017)
ANNALINDE gGmbH, retrieved 08/13/2018 from Dominik Renner